You are prudent in being cautious here, as you are skirting the boundary in taking chances to generate a backlash of some kind that could spread and harm your reputation. But we see the planned channeling as serving more than detracting from the aim of GetWisdom to enlighten, to teach, and to expand greater awareness of the grand deception underway to commandeer the lightworkers and distract and disinform them. It is too huge a problem to sweep under the rug because it is unseemly or perhaps would draw the ire of many devoted fans. While this can create too great a firestorm for certain groups and topics, this is one where enough time has elapsed that it would be safer to engage and begin to do a process of revelation with her direct involvement after all, and this is something quite different than your criticism coming personally from your own negative views of her contributions. You are simply asking her to correct the record should that need to be done and of benefit. So this has our blessing and we wish you full speed ahead.
This is not to say there will be no repercussions. Whenever you step on toes there will be hurt feelings and potential recriminations. It will induce soul-searching and will create an emotional reaction in many individuals who hold her near and dear, but keep in mind those who will reject such an assessment automatically, have themselves been blinded, most likely, to the truth and are likely unreachable at this time anyway. So while they can be an influence in opposition to some extent through their disparagement and word-of-mouth etc., you are not losing them as followers because they would not be available to you in any case. Someone who is open to truth would look at a potential serious criticism done in earnest and for a lofty purpose, and take it seriously enough to weigh its merits, simply to be thorough and careful to not overlook a hidden flaw that might not have been apparent. That is not being disloyal, it is simply being open to information and that is always a good thing. If one comes away with their belief in something still unwavering, it may well be the stronger for having examined a criticism.
So in the end, these tests of reason and accuracy will add armor plating if the tests are passed with flying colors. This of course is a gray area. By virtue of the nature of the material at hand, it cannot be vetted unequivocally by today’s standards because it is esoteric knowledge gained from sources sight unseen, and that always has the level of uncertainty attendant to that reality. But there are two factors involved here. One is whether your story holds together logically and has explanatory power, and also the fact it will be supported by the divine realm. So anyone engaging in a serious way with the mind at all open to the truth will get a blessing from Creator for considering your words, and that will also be, in a sense, a powerful vetting of the value because people are used to using their own radar and are often correct in their assumptions about whether they like and trust something, or are suspicious for some reason.
It is difficult when people have grown accustomed to believing in a source of information and then it is called into question. This becomes a very personal matter for many and we understand it can be painful. But in the end, it is better to know truth than to live a lie, no matter how comfortable it might become in not requiring a major change in thinking. It is always the case that people will receive help with a search for truth that is sincere, heartfelt, and particularly if they are in divine alignment through their intentions to be so.
For the most part, this is the intransigence of fixed ideas, hardened beliefs within the mind of the skeptics themselves among the scientific community, and many who pursue scientific subjects as writers to help transfer the knowledge to the laymen, so to speak. Because they are programmed to disbelieve such things, they feel duty-bound by their own beliefs to find fault with any reports of the paranormal and will seek avidly to find a way to dismiss such observations as artifactual, mistaken, or, in isolated instances, fabricated for the occasion. So their outlook at the outset is the expectation of disproving rather than proving the phenomena are real, and going from there, as an open-minded, uncorrupted scientist would do, seeking deeper truth and probing ever deeper to unearth it. This leads to all kinds of misconceptions, missed opportunities, and faulty science, because even when observations occur that are clearly outside the norm and far from trivial, because the chance of them occurring through a random event of some kind is remote in the extreme, it will not register, they will simply assume there is a technical problem and will ignore the observations.
So what you are seeing is selective data, and picked-over observations, and their associated conclusions that fit prior conception as much as the data themselves and, of course, what one expects to find predetermines to a large extent how one goes about it. So, often the dice are loaded against finding the unusual because it seems like a waste of time to be too open-ended with respect to the possibilities. So work of this kind tends to be very narrow, very finely focused on the minutia, because it is readily observable and may be reproducible and lend itself to mathematical analysis, and so on. But that biases things from the outset and precludes making genuine breakthroughs in many settings, so it is a foregone conclusion, in the very planning stage, what the outcome will be. This is most unfortunate because there is a wide universe of fascinating phenomena in the arena of consciousness, awaiting science to awaken from its slumber under a heavy fog of mind control manipulation to stifle curiosity and limit thinking about the possibilities. Both the outside influences and the inner corruption conspire together to thwart true progress from happening most of the time.
Although you are second-guessing yourself in hindsight, now that you are sitting down to do the channeling, you had this idea because you were able to see intuitively, the truth of things here. The uneven performance of world leaders is entirely due to manipulation. After all, they are simply called upon to act the part in demonstrating calm, strength, statesmanship, and a grasp of the issues, and an ability to give a good speech that sets the right tone, gives reassurance to those who need it, and signals strength and resolve to adversaries to give them pause about making things worse or doing something rash. That will be more likely to happen if they sense weakness. In actuality, world affairs are micromanaged from behind the scenes all the time by the Extraterrestrial Alliance. So in this way they get nations to dance with one another in a kind of tug-of-war many times, jockeying for position in a kind of daredevil contest like a game of chicken. This creates fun and excitement for the interlopers because they risk nothing. It is humans who will suffer the consequences of what they set in motion, causing leaders to stumble or exceed reason and logic with a rash move of aggression that leads to a catastrophe, hurting them as much is their victim. So all of the factors and influences you cite are true and accurate, and this provides a window into how the balance of power can be shifted and cause the most powerful country to hesitate in a crucial way to allow an encroachment or a military misadventure to keep going. In this case, it serves the Extraterrestrial Alliance and their plans to gin up World War III. So time will tell how much they can get away with and how much humans can be made to be complacent and unwittingly collaborate in bringing that about.
