Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “From my understanding of Karl’s channeling from Creator, illnesses such as cancer take many sessions to heal, and when asking for healing we must specifically state what we want healed. Since the LHP covers healing of all aspects of a person’s life, I have just been listing my family members’ names when doing an LHP and asking that all mental and/or physical problems be healed for them. I also include these same family members every time I do an LHP. In the protocol, each person’s higher self and God determines what needs to be healed. Have I been doing the LHPs wrong by not listing specific items for each family member that I think needs healing?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
153 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I am mystified as to why humans are in a position to solve evil and save the universe. Humans do not have the capabilities that the ETs have—shape-shifting, psychic abilities, as well as the advanced technical and scientific know-how with access beyond the Earth. We are in a compromised position. And yet, Source Creator has His hopes on the human to save His creation and, despite our fragility, we seem to be succeeding. What is it about the human that makes us capable of achieving the saving of humanity, other ET species, and the universe, despite our lack of any physical or technical “superpowers?” Are there any other races, elsewhere in our galaxy, currently doing the same thing as us?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
119 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “If we succeed in making the Extraterrestrial Alliance withdraw, would this be done with or without the knowledge of their hybrid minions in the global power structure?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will the Extraterrestrial Alliance’s hybrid minions be charged with keeping an eye on their farm, whilst away, maybe with the Mercenary Army Program recruits acting as overall watchdogs to ensure compliance?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Why do the concepts of reincarnation, cyclical existence, and cosmic (akashic) memory and karmic consequences not appear in Christian Biblical teachings, which focus more on a linear timeline from creation to final judgment? Although there are perhaps oblique references to these ideas such as The Book of Life referred to in the Old and New Testaments, they are not elaborated or their implications explained. Is this due to manipulation of written records to limit human understanding by “the usual suspects,” the cultural emphases of the time, or other reasons?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
131 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Please can you enquire with Creator whether my working with energy healer [name withheld] is for my highest and best, please? I have previously found benefit and am strongly attracted to his channeling course. I ALWAYS protect my space and call in God when working with anyone.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
133 views0 answers0 votes
A former intelligence agent started a business coaching people in spy techniques and insights that he believed could be applied to everyday life to help people be more effective in accomplishing whatever it is they set out to do. Like most things in life, these techniques and understandings can be used for good or evil. A match can light a birthday candle or start a forest fire. To the extent that others might use these teachings for harm, how much karmic liability attaches to the teacher? Is this a reason why dangerous knowledge was historically reserved for initiates? And even that would seem to have karmic polarity in that it safeguards the innocent and immature on the one hand, but can also be a means to hoard and deny access to resources that one can argue should be more widely shared. What is Creator’s perspective on the “safe handling” and/or dissemination and sharing of material that is potentially helpful but equally dangerous?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
213 views0 answers0 votes
Intelligence agencies are in the business of gathering intelligence—information that is difficult to attain through ordinary means; information that people are hesitant and resistant to give up or share. The successful intelligence agent will employ the tools of motivation and manipulation to get this information. These tools are matched to particular means with which to motivate and/or manipulate people to get them to do what you want them to do. These approaches are referred to with the acronym “R.I.C.E.” Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. Of these four, appealing to ideology is seen as the most effective, and coercion the least. If you successfully appeal to ideology, the “target” will trust you and share almost anything. Coercion is the weakest as, contrary to Hollywood, it may work the first time you use it, but then you destroy trust and will have fewer opportunities for future success with the target. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
133 views0 answers0 votes
While being trained as an intelligence officer, this individual learned he was an ideal candidate because he was special (clearly an appeal to ego), or at least that is what he thought. But, in fact, he learned he was special because he had been algorithmically identified as psychologically damaged and traumatized in particular ways that were useful for intelligence gathering. These are people one would rarely label “well adjusted” by society’s standards. The agency was ruthlessly honest in telling him they intended to leverage that dysfunction, give him a vocabulary for understanding the nuances of human motivation and manipulation, and techniques for achieving goals and agendas with targets. In this undertaking, the overall wellbeing of the target is not a top consideration and moral flexibility was a prized capacity for successful agents. What is Creator’s perspective on the moral flexibility so highly prized by intelligence agencies?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
129 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer shared that if you need a target’s cooperation, and there is no means by which to positively and transparently motivate them, then that gives you the green light to manipulate them. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
134 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer warned that the typical person has no idea just how much and on what scale advanced motivation and manipulation techniques are being deployed against them. It’s not a conspiracy theory. Creator has affirmed this as well on multiple occasions. When confronted with this reality, two questions come to mind. Can I avoid it? And if I can’t avoid it, can I successfully resist it? Is there even an answer outside of divine partnership? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
145 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer shared that he was taught about the difference between perception and perspective. Perception is what you sense with your five senses (and maybe your sixth). But its range is narrow and its reliability poor. It operates on instinct and emotion, so you twitch when someone you don’t expect touches you, or you see a dark shadow and jump thinking it’s a rat when it’s really dirty laundry on the floor. Perspective is your knowing that you’ve never encountered a rat in your room and that the odds of it being a rat are tiny. He claims he was taught to favor perspective over perception. We know that past life trauma resonates and could be why you reacted as you did, and that in a past life that dark shape on the floor WAS a rat. But even if that is true, it is not true in the current place and timeframe. “Don’t trust your gut” was his message and to always question, if not doubt outright, your first emotional reaction to anything. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
132 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer shared that it is accepted as an operating fact that 90% of people are trapped in their own perception. In other words, 90% of people think and respond emotionally, not rationally. In fact, those 90% do not even know there is a difference. This is the fundamental difference between trained and untrained people according to this former intelligence officer. And that it’s the most important skill an intelligence officer needs to learn and master, to think from perspective. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
125 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer said the human condition is extremely predictable. People want to feel heard, they want to feel listened to, and they want to feel validated. He says feeding these desires can be automated, and the result will be people willingly selling out themselves, often without any awareness that they are doing so. Everything we’ve learned so far about influencing people seems to be fundamental tradecraft in how to motivate (by positive reinforcement) or manipulate (by negative reinforcement). For someone who wants to safeguard themselves from falling victim to this kind of influence, how helpful is it to learn and understand how one’s own emotions and human needs can be leveraged against them? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
119 views0 answers0 votes
When someone confronts the fact that there is manipulation all around, is there any way to protect themselves from it? Are people trapped in their perception and their emotions more vulnerable to manipulation than people who exercise more perspective? Or are both hopelessly vulnerable and there is no genuine protection outside of divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…5051525354…649Next »
Ask Question