Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
In the Philadelphia Experiment lore, it was said that some of those who disappeared while on a ship, as part of an attempt at time travel, then reappeared with the ship minutes later but were “hopelessly insane.” That even though they had been “gone” for but a few minutes, they reportedly experienced being in limbo for an interminable time that felt like a million years. Did this happen? And if so, how can consciousness experience a million years of time, in just a few minutes on Earth?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
507 views0 answers1 votes
Is this being in limbo the time travelers experienced exactly the same as the limbo experienced by one-third of humanity at death, who become earthbound spirits? Is boredom the most excruciatingly painful experience of being in limbo?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
374 views0 answers0 votes
Some healers and exorcists have had a practice of confining a demon in an “energetic box.” If kept in there indefinitely, they would eventually run out of life force energy and the demon’s consciousness would dissolve into oblivion or the great ocean of Creator’s consciousness, and their individuality would be lost for all time. Is boredom a symptom of consciousness degradation, or a cause of degradation, or both? How long can the average demon remain in that box before complete dissolution? What are the karmic ramifications for the practitioners doing this to a demon?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
402 views0 answers0 votes
How big of a problem is boredom for the extraterrestrial interlopers? Especially for the Anunnaki who can live up to a million years? How much is boredom a cause of evil, and how does it contribute to the development of depravity?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
390 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help to heal those excessively plagued by boredom?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
435 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Why were the stone circles at Avebury and Stonehenge built? And how did they move them into place? There are many different theories on why they were built, it’s confusing. Only one can be right.”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
627 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Regarding SARS-CoV-2 deaths in India, there is now overwhelming scientific evidence, that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. At no time there was a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. Therefore if this is true, the PCR test does not test for the SARS-CoV-2 and all positive tests are then “false positives.” Also, there is growing evidence that the so called “vaccines,” are doing more harm than good, so we have been lied to by World Governments. Can you please advise us if this is really the truth?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
498 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Then all of these people that are dying in India, (and from other parts of the world), what are they are dying of? If the SARS-CoV-2 is not the culprit, is this infection caused by a bioweapon? Can you please help us understand what it is going on (culling of the population?) so that we can filter all the lies and confusion we all have at this point in time? This way we can focus our prayers on the “proper cause” and direct divine healing to the same, for all humanity at large.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
445 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, in the Alternative Spiritual Movement there is much emphasis on the Universal Law of Attraction. What is the truth about this law?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
494 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “With so much conflicting information about COVID and vaccinations, I’ve become so unsure how to recognize what is truth and what is misinformation. Is it beneficial to my health to take the vaccine or will it create greater health or societal problems in the future? Is the risk of not receiving the COVID vaccination greater or more problematic than the risks of getting it?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
506 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer writes: “Dr. Richard Fleming is a Physicist and Nuclear Cardiologist. He first presented in 1994 a theory to the American Heart Association why people with the SARS-CoV-2 virus could manifest an inflammo-thrombotic disease – we now know as COVID-19. This theory of inflammation and heart disease accounts for why people with comorbidities were dying of COVID-19 – because they weren’t being treated for these known effects.” Is this the case, or only part of the story?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
344 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “He said this is not a naturally occurring virus (we know) and he followed the trails leading to the Gain-of-Function work, where the money came from, who funded it, etc. The spike protein contains human genome sequences inserted into the spike protein, and that this spike protein is doing EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO, which is to increase infection and create inflammation and blood clots.” Is this all true?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
411 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “He said the vaccines actually have components in them to DISSOLVE blood clots, indicating that this was a known effect.” Is this true?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
384 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “When the coronavirus was simply being transmitted person to person, it was only people with increased vulnerability due to comorbidities, such as diabetes and heart disease, that were having issues with inflammation and blood clots, which they were NOT being treated for. Now with the vaccine, the body is being turned into a spike protein-producing factory, and so people with otherwise healthy immune systems are now having inflammo-thrombotic issues. This is why we’re seeing the deaths he says.” Is this true? Are the vaccines causing deaths through this mechanism? If so, what is the incidence?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
413 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “He studied the FDA’s own EUA documents, and using THEIR data submitted to them by the vaccine-making pharmaceutical companies, he concluded that THERE WAS NO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE that any of the vaccines slow the spread of COVID-19. This was not HIS data, but EUA data provided by the vaccine manufacturers to the FDA. NO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE that these vaccines slowed the spread of infection. The media is saying there is 96% “efficacy.” But really what they’re saying, he says, is that 96% won’t have immediate side effects from the vaccines!!! That’s what the mainstream media is pushing as efficacy!” Is this correct?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
367 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…318319320321322…653Next »
Ask Question