Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Is the “Order of Spirits,” as defined in The Spirits’ Book, still a valid way to understand them—where the first order are the pure spirits, the second those willing and wanting to do good with trials still facing them, and then the third order which are characterized as ignorant and/or mischievous or even evil?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
465 views0 answers0 votes
What has made the major Spiritists’ organization intractable and perhaps unable to accept the fact that Karl Mollison was once Allan Kardec?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
527 views0 answers0 votes
Was there a form of spirit communication that made it into Kardec’s work that did not come from spirits in the light or spirits that had not successfully transitioned? Is there a third category overlooked?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
492 views0 answers0 votes
How much of the material in Kardec’s The Spirits’ Book was sourced from Anunnaki psychics? Can you give us an example?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
504 views0 answers0 votes
What did the ET cohort do about Allan Kardec’s work? He was evidently doing something they would not consider in their best interests. Where was he hindered and how was he protected?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
433 views0 answers0 votes
In the Lightworker Healing Protocol, we request dream state repair of cellular consciousness karmic issues in saying “Source Creator, work with the cellular consciousness of the body and mind directly, during the dream state, and give reminders as needed, to engage with the parts of the body and mind struggling with the most pressing client issues involving cellular memory, guiding it to call on the higher self and Creator directly by name for help to identify, heal, or replace in its own memory, beliefs, and emotional consequences, as well as the akashic records, what is highest and best to accomplish.” Instead of using the word “replace” would it be better to use the word “transmute” as that might give guidance and precision in carrying out the healing?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
337 views0 answers0 votes
Can you confirm what we channeled, that free-floating memories are not created and stored by cellular consciousness, and does that apply to thought forms as well?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
325 views0 answers0 votes
Does Eye Motion Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) address and correct cellular memory issues? If so, how effectively compared to our current protocol with deep subconscious channeling?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
321 views0 answers0 votes
The Farsight Institute recently did a large remote viewing project on Lucifer. The Farsight Institute is an organization doing publicly accessible remote viewing based on military-developed protocols. An interesting point of distinction is their emphasis on recruiting young and diverse remote viewers. Knowing the influx of Indigo Children, it appears that most if not all of these young viewers (20-somethings at most) are indeed profoundly intuitive. What is Creator’s perspective on The Farsight Institute and its young, talented slate of remote viewers?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
413 views0 answers0 votes
We know that more than 90% of channelers are not channeling who they intend to channel. We also know that any intuitive outreach is potentially risky, both in terms of the veracity of the information received, as well as to the physical and spiritual well-being of the channeler. The Farsight Institute uses a military protocol and therefore does not reveal the target of the viewing prior to the remote viewing session. Does this ignorance on the part of the remote viewer provide any protection at all against interloper intrusion? Does it provide the intended protection against preconceived notions on the part of the remote viewer? If they are not getting adequate divine protection for their work, can that protection be provided, at least to some degree, by GetWisdom Lightworker Healing Protocol practitioners for these remote viewers as they do their work?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
361 views0 answers0 votes
One of the viewers saw Lucifer as a “created being” whose job was chaos to counter or offset ordered creation that was intended to create a balanced physical universe, but that he had rejected divine oversight and began to create chaos on his own. Can Creator comment on this observation? Would an analogy be the difference between a controlled demolition contractor and a terrorist bomber?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
365 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator comment further on what Lucifer’s job was, and presumably still would be, if he had not fallen and remained in divine alignment?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
388 views0 answers0 votes
Creator recently commented that the interlopers, led by the Anunnaki, had been responsible for the destruction of thousands of worlds within the Milky Way Galaxy. One of the remote viewers saw this destruction and pinned most if not all of the blame squarely on Lucifer. Lucifer has widely been regarded as the leader of the fallen angelics, and it was the fallen angelics who corrupted the members of the Extraterrestrial Alliance. So is this characterization of Lucifer accurate? Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
392 views0 answers0 votes
Was Lucifer truly the first angel to fall, or was he simply the most powerful one to do so? And, as a result, became the recognized leader of the fallen angelics for that reason?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
343 views0 answers0 votes
Nearly all the remote viewers saw a great deal of physicality with Lucifer. He wasn’t purely physical, but had a physical persona, and luxurious physical surroundings. We know angels, and the archangels in particular, can “materialize” in the physical when needed. Does Lucifer, even in his fallen state, still retain that ability to materialize in the physical? Does he abuse this capability and has he developed a habit and even desire or obsession or addiction to do this on a regular basis, to the extent that a remote viewer would intuit this, versus visualizing Lucifer’s counterpart (not mentioned but presumed to be Archangel Michael) as being predominately spiritual in makeup?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
398 views0 answers1 votes
« Previous1…285286287288289…669Next »
Ask Question