DWQA Questions › Tag: time loopsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA practitioner asks: “I went back to a Helena Blavatsky channeling to try and better understand TIME. For the following paragraphs, my thoughts are in brackets, the rest is Helena Blavatsky. Helena Blavatsky states: “Everything you do is interacting energetically with ALL of TIME – past, present, future, and extensions of the future that are a re-echoing of potentials being created in the moment … The energy [of time, called time] can be channeled … Has many possibilities of expression, some of which is in the many life forms throughout the universe,” and “the energy of time – and time is a conveyance of consciousness – it has a continual motion…” [Wait, does this imply TIME is conscious? These two comments seem to contradict each other unless I’m not understanding both of these statements.]” What is the true divine perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics307 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner writes: “Helena Blavatsky states: “The projection of TIME carries with it the energy of creation emanating from ALL of the beings participating in the life process,” and “they all have an energetic signature and influence one another. This is a vast interplay of energy.” Can you give us the divine perspective of this information and the truth of what it’s about?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics296 views0 answers0 votesDoes including Time itself as a client in the Lightworker Healing Protocol have practical value for healing? Would this be subsumed by a request to include not only all that is within the free will galaxy, including the ether, but also what is without?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol341 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Do time travel technologies depend on etheric fine-matter emissions of operator consciousness and induction/coupling relations between the etheric and time fundamental force fields?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness291 views0 answers0 votesA student asks, “One form of contemplated time travel is my 56-year-old self goes back to 1963 (when he was an infant) to witness the Kennedy assassination first-hand. Maybe as a non-descript 56 year-old man who stands in the sidewalk crowd. If someone snapped a picture of the crowd he was in back then, and stuck it in their scrapbook; and if I returned to today and got ahold of that scrapbook, would I see myself in the photo?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics369 views0 answers0 votesA common fantasy is, “If I only knew then what I know now, my life could be so much better.” Could we make such fantasies come true via time travel, to literally go back in time intuitively and tell our younger self at a critical juncture how to choose the right fork in the road instead of the wrong one, and change our destiny accordingly?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics425 views0 answers0 votesIn lieu of having advanced alien technology to time travel, is it possible to go back in time using our intuitive ability, for example, to channel our younger self at a certain point in time and have a conversation where we provide guidance and insight about the future that will be coming so we can take measures to avoid making a terrible mistake?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics404 views0 answers0 votesWhen we asked about the impact in terms of karma from someone killing themselves as an infant to avoid the troubled childhood they went through originally, you answered: “It would be too late to have undone those things influencing the person from the future, because their impact would have played out already and that karma would have had the intervening time to cause changes in the individual.” But then you said, and seemingly contradictory, “There would be a missing segment of trauma events no longer able to carry forward through a looping of time to influence the person adversely, so this would represent a potential benefit.” Can you explain which is true, or the contradictory answer more fully?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics368 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Can we expand all our previous sessions on individuals or groups by including new members to them in a similar fashion as we do with each Lightworker Healing Protocol version by doing a session on all our previous clients?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol305 views0 answers0 votesWe understand that all lifetimes, past, present, and future, are taking place in parallel. Do they have quite differing starting points in time relative to our perspectives of the current life? In other words, did many of our past lives start prior to the birth date of our current life, while future lives start some time beyond where we are in our current life? Are there no such consistencies, or does it perhaps not matter because there can be crosstalk with the current life regardless of starting and stopping points?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics403 views0 answers0 votesIs it useful to consider the starting points of future extensions of the past, current, and future lifetimes relative to the current life being experienced, when we think about the karmic interplay through crosstalk?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics355 views0 answers0 votesYou commented previously that a problem healed effectively by a previous Lightworker Healing Protocol session could be reawakened by similar trauma occurring during an ongoing past life future extension, and through crosstalk with the present life, might undo the prior healing done. Will that type of problem now be prevented because of the latest Protocol provision to do repeat sessions in perpetuity? Will that catch new, emerging problems going forward?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics351 views0 answers0 votesI think I’m starting to understand the issues about going into the past and changing something and how it may not impact the future already created. Is it correct to say that if events have taken place involving me and then I go back in time and do something to cause the death of my younger self, perhaps at a very young age so that nothing in that timeline would seem to have happened from my perspective in pondering the consequences, that would clearly not be the reality? What you’ve been teaching is that by virtue of the fact I reached that child self’s future and then was able to come back, all of the consequences of my earlier days were, therefore, already created. So, in effect, if I were to go back in time and kill myself as an infant, for example, that would seem to leave a hole in that infant’s potential future. But, in actuality, there was a future already in existence from that infant growing up to become myself in that future time when I commenced to travel back and cause harm to my infant self. Am I on the right track here to understand why things will not unravel when changes to events in the past are done through time travel?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics348 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “So I take it, that I “can” go back and kill my grandfather and will continue to breathe and leave pollution, etc. But didn’t the act of killing my grandfather create a “new” timeline—one absent my now deceased grandfather? Or did it alter the “same” timeline and I effectively altered the future I came from?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics327 views0 answers0 votesNow that the future is “altered” after the disappearance of my grandfather, if I return to it, won’t I at least be a “stranger” there? With no history, no record of my existence, except the one I carry in my own personal memory? Or are there TWO futures I could travel to? One where I killed my grandfather, and one where I did not?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics435 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola