DWQA Questions › Tag: Ten Divine Principles for LivingFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote: “… a man who belongs to a given nation is obviously neither guilty nor meritorious by that fact alone. His guilt would begin when, for example, he did not cultivate in himself the special talents of the nation, or took no part in national cultural values; while he would be acting meritoriously if he overcame in himself certain characterological weaknesses of the nation by a conscious process of self-examination.” Frankl’s perspective is quite thought provoking when it is understood that some of the most common oaths sworn today are to the nations that people live in. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma256 views0 answers0 votesNorman Douglas said: “Never take a solemn oath. People might think you mean it.” This would be especially true if it was a “witnessed” event. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma264 views0 answers0 votesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote: “Every one of us knows somehow that the content of his life is somehow preserved and saved.” If the taking of an oath is an affirmative deed that becomes recorded for all of time in the akashic records, one can never get away from it completely, and at the very least, the event will always be in the recorded history of the soul. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma316 views0 answers0 votesThe most pernicious form of oath is the loyalty oath accompanied by a requirement to carry out a nefarious deed, such as killing another human being. Some people consider this urban myth and don’t want to believe that this actually happens. However, a recent local story about a random shooting was published in Grand Rapids, Michigan. For the story, the reporter consulted with a former Chicago gang member for his analysis. The consultant says to join the gang the shooter was suspected of trying to join, a person must kill a rival gang member or someone random. But the rules are they can’t get caught. What can Creator tell us? Is this an urban myth? And if not, how widespread a problem is it?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma266 views0 answers0 votesIt would seem that the power of an oath depends on how successfully it alters and/or cements belief. Is it correct to say it’s not the oath itself that binds, but the effect it has on the beliefs of oath takers, oath administrators, and oath witnesses?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma241 views0 answers0 votesGeorge Washington said: “Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation deserts the oaths.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma262 views0 answers0 votesWhat is Creator’s perspective on the American “Pledge of Allegiance?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma287 views0 answers0 votesSamuel Coleridge Taylor said: “The present system of taking oaths is horrible. It is awfully absurd to make a man invoke God’s wrath upon himself, if he speaks false; it is, in my judgment, a sin to do so.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma271 views0 answers0 votesThe Lightworker Healing Protocol expressly lists “oaths” as a spiritual reality requiring healing intervention. Can Creator summarize why this is so, and how Empowered Prayer and The Lightworker Healing Protocol are the most effective means to reverse the damage to the soul they can do?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma248 views0 answers0 votesCreator has shared with us that the Milky Way Galaxy is the only location in the current universe where there is “unconditional” free will. It is easier to understand the word “free” than it is to understand the word “will.” If we consider that every person is unique, the principal quality of their uniqueness is their “will.” No two people even want precisely the same things, at the same time, in the same amounts, with the same intensity, etc. So people will strive to express, or attempt to express, their uniqueness in a way that optimizes their satisfaction. To have free will appears to mean that there is no traffic cop acting as a brake on behavior chosen by will. Yet, we inevitably compete with and are restrained by one another, and ultimately, by laws that limit choices. So free will is the freedom to express one’s uniqueness, but not freedom from the consequences. The phrase, “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes,” comes to mind. But you can’t play stupid games if you don’t have the freedom to play stupid games! What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma277 views0 answers0 votesCreator has shared with us that in the rest of the universe, karma is a much more immediate feedback mechanism. Some people are born empaths and can feel the emotions of the people around them, and this gives them feedback to truly feel the pain they may have caused others and serves as a brake on bad behavior. So in the rest of the universe, is everyone essentially an empath, and is that what keeps the peace more than any other influence?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma283 views0 answers0 votesPeople seem to love a good comeuppance, except when it happens to them. Bad behavior meeting instant justice is like gawking at a train wreck—you know it’s terrible, but you can’t help looking at it. Of course, part of the reason it’s compelling to look at is that there is no direct sharing in the pain of the experience. In the military, the practice of punishing an entire platoon for the aberrant behavior of a single recruit or draftee has been discovered to work well in reducing such behavior across the entire group. Forcing them to share the pain would not be “fun” at all. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma269 views0 answers0 votesThere is a saying (by Robert A. Heinlein) that “An armed society is a polite society.” As problematic as they are, firearms are a great equalizer, as the small and frail can be just as deadly as the biggest and strongest. In the rest of the universe, are painful emotions like carrying a firearm—dangerous to everyone, and so everyone is on their best behavior?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma256 views0 answers0 votesWe know the immediate karmic system is an effective one but, as Creator has shared before, it can account for a kind of staleness. Apparently, this is a kind of nagging staleness that begs for a solution, or there would be no incentive for creating the Free Will Project. How truly widespread is this “staleness?” Does everyone feel it to one degree or another? Was it our own dissatisfaction that encouraged, perhaps even drove, some of us to volunteer for the Free Will Project?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma256 views0 answers0 votes“No pain, no gain,” is a common expression whose truth seems apparent. In the rest of the universe, it appears that an emphasis on the avoidance of pain means there is little genuine risk-taking as compared to the recklessness we see amongst humans here on Earth. Sometimes a greater good emerges from a painful and risky undertaking. Is this recognition part of the incentive for creating the Free Will Project?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma288 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola