DWQA Questions › Tag: subatomic particlesFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “When I look at the akashic records, as far as I can tell, whatever I look at feels like it’s something that happened to me. Even if it was someone else. I can’t tell the difference. It’s the only way I seem to be able to read the accounting of things that have occurred. And so far, never on purpose. It just happens. Is this the only way the akashic records can be read; looked at; understood? Are “reading” and “experiencing” the same thing at the akashic records?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness220 views0 answers0 votesA channeler asks: “Is there something I can read about Creator’s translator and the mechanism of that? I’ve never understood it nor ever encountered the concept prior to meeting you.” Can you explain for future reference what Creator’s translator is and how it works, in contrast to telepathic communications?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls254 views0 answers1 votesA channeler asks: “What is considered channeling? Does it have to be higher-level, as through Creator’s translator, and the capability pre-planned in the light prior to incarnating? Or is contacting the Deep Subconscious without Creator also considered channeling?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls210 views0 answers0 votesA channeler asks: “Is the reason the more than 90% of “channelers” who are corrupted are not considered as doing true channeling because they were just hijacked by interlopers telepathically, and did not need a pre-birth arrangement to achieve that capability? Is that why so many (relatively speaking) can do that now?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls225 views0 answers0 votesA channeler asks: “What is the difference between channeling and telepathy?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls235 views0 answers0 votesA channeler asks: “If channeling and telepathic communication are often confused, then how would I describe what I do courtesy of using Creator’s translator (vs. the other >90% of “channelers”). Would the term ‘divinely assisted’ or ‘divinely supported’ channeling be better, or even divinely supported telepathic communication (what we have been calling ‘authentic channeling’).” What is the best term for us to use?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls229 views0 answers0 votesA channeler asks: “Will people lacking Creator’s translator but who are able to channel the deep subconscious, or dark spirits, be safe in doing so, and have their conversation protected from outside listening and interference if safety is requested from Creator?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls207 views0 answers0 votesA channeler asks: “Those of us with a pre-arrangement and gateway for Creator’s translator can also get corrupted if waylaid by an ET psychic, can’t we? Isn’t that the whole point of protection and using the Prayer of Connection? Well, if that’s so, who’s to say none of the >90% are also in that category? It seems logical to assume that SOME of those corrupted “channelers” are more like me if I’d gone astray? Is this correct?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls201 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Here’s a million-dollar question. Does my healing of what I picked up from my mother (with regards to specific woundings I am aware of intuitively) somehow heal or affect her? Even if it doesn’t, just being aware of it makes it possible for me to request healing for her with a better and stronger mindset. But are her Interdimensional DNA and morphogenetic field still connected in any way to me after I was born? I feel like they are and maybe you covered that in the webinar. I will have to revisit.” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness172 views0 answers0 votesYou have told us that we each have a unique morphogenetic field that governs much of our individual makeup, our personality as well as physical form and appearance. Yet, there are many traits that seem clearly to be from the family lineage, and seem genetic in the conventional scientific sense, giving rise to offspring with a strong physical resemblance to one parent in particular, or having some characteristics of both. Do morphogenetic field influences from both parents somehow combine with the morphogenetic field of the incoming soul to impinge on the developing embryo? Is that combining done in the light?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness192 views0 answers0 votesAre the changes to the morphogenetic field permanent, so they could affect subsequent incarnations as well?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness197 views0 answers0 votesYou have explained to us that the energy coming to us from the soul is both life force energy to animate the body, and a morphogenetic field that provides the blueprint determining the way things are organized to create both form and function of all levels of the body. Is the morphogenetic field conveyed as a part of, or does it comprise all of, the interdimensional DNA that you have said provides a kind of foundational energy for human beings?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness181 views0 answers0 votesIs the makeup of the physical body and its component parts, down to the cellular and molecular levels, all derived from the life force energy arising from the soul? Or is the physical-seeming part of us created through the actions of consciousness from a morphogenetic field impinging on the zero-point field of fundamental energy, and turning it into matter?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness195 views0 answers0 votesIn what circumstances does human consciousness utilize the zero-point field to make things happen?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness196 views0 answers0 votesThe zero-point field is a gigantic repository of energy. What is its purpose? How is its energy used creatively?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness202 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola