DWQA Questions › Tag: specificityFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesWe have a clearer understanding now about extraterrestrial anchor chips, and the ubiquitous microchips people ingest with food and beverages. Can you help us understand what our original request for removal of “alien implants” was taking care of, if it did not address anchor chips and microchips?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol476 views0 answers0 votesIn the Soul Matrix Healing request, is it of value to have after the mention of microchips the added list, “including remote Stealth technologies: radiation weapons, microwave and laser weapons, sonic weapons, scalar weapons, anchor nanochips and other nanotechnology weapons, neurotechnology weapons, cloaking and disguise technologies, radio frequency tracking technologies, radio hypnosis technologies, synthetic telepathy and microwave hearing, CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery,” or will those be addressed by the subsequent inclusion of “all other outside harmful energies?”ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol494 views0 answers0 votesA student asks: “Will asking to have effects of “toxins” removed during the Soul Matrix Healing include heavy metal removal, or would it be better to specify that in addition?” Is there a better, general, all-encompassing, term we could use, like “all toxic substances?”ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol436 views0 answers0 votesMy student [name withheld] writes: “I think we need to define the different types of “alien portals.” I think many types of beings use different types of portals. In the session we did muscle testing on which beings use what portals, and that was helpful. But it also feels like there is a type of portal still remaining in me? Perhaps only because we haven’t defined it well enough.” Are there additional types of portals we need to learn about to specify their removal? What does he see that he feels is a novel portal?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol447 views0 answers0 votesA student asks: “At the end of Lightworker Healing Protocol it says to erase the energetic trail to myself, and we thought it was a good idea to add the client to that statement as some of the healing may come from the client.” Is that good idea or not necessary for most users of the Protocol?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol421 views0 answers0 votesA student asks: “Where the Lightworker Healing Protocol requests you to “remove negativity from outside attacks” could that statement also include removal of self-created negativity?”ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol429 views0 answers0 votesIf a practitioner is doing a Lightworker Healing Protocol session for a list of clients and wants to be sure they are given a high priority, does the practitioner need to do a session just for them, and not just do a general session to be applied to all of humanity? Will doing the latter delay getting the quickest healing help for the known clients in need?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol549 views0 answers0 votesIf doing a Lightworker Healing Protocol session for a group of known clients while also specifying all of humanity to be included results in a compromise, can the high priority client group be requested to be worked on first, followed by a request to have the rest of humanity worked on in like fashion, in order to ensure their clients get high priority, but still do both groups with a single Protocol session? Will that preserve a potential advantage for clients a practitioner has obligations to, but still put the session work to broader use for the human population?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol542 views0 answers0 votesIf the broad requests for healing traumas and limiting beliefs are used in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, is the current step requesting subconscious channeling with our Protocol questions redundant and unnecessary?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol381 views0 answers0 votesIn thinking about the interconnectedness of people, when making a request for inclusion of one’s family in a Lightworker Healing Protocol session, where do the dividing lines stop in terms of first-degree, second-degree, third-degree relatives, etc?ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol417 views0 answers0 votesCan one person make a request for all of humanity be included in a Lightworker Healing Protocol session by having the divine realm parcel out the work in segments executed in perpetuity, every other day, addressing only the number of clients in each session proportional to the energetic reach of the practitioner as applied to each segment of the group?ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol433 views0 answers0 votesCan any of the above proposed group healing requests specify the inclusion of all companion animals belonging to the people involved? Will the animals receive comparable benefits compared to being part of an all-animal session with that specific Lightworker Healing Protocol session?ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol398 views0 answers0 votesCan a Lightworker Healing Protocol request to have a large group of people worked on in manageable subgroups in perpetuity, every other day, include also their residences, schools, and workplaces, with suitable incorporation of the additional unique steps for locations? Can wording be added to have the target of the work change as appropriate with a change in school, place of residence, or employment?ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol444 views0 answers0 votesCan the Lightworker Healing Protocol benefits be enhanced by the determination on the part of the practitioner to bring healing to his/her target, can that prompt the divine realm to further extend his healing efforts?ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol402 views0 answers0 votesThis practitioner’s situation, having done 300 Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions for a target group of interest, brings up the issue of whether it’s possible to simply request that the new, extended, Protocol be applied to those prior clients. Can that simply be asked to happen, to apply the previous intention to the new Protocol, including the extended provisions, or must at least one new session be done with the enhanced Protocol, with a request to apply it to the prior client group, to be worked on as subgroups of a manageable size?ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol443 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola