DWQA Questions › Tag: soul makeupFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesIt would seem helper types are not good at being alone for long stretches. As cruel as solitary confinement is, it might be the most cruel to do that to a helper. Helpers have a need to be around people and even animals. Yet, are also often aware of their shortcomings as not being as gabby as orators, or as entertaining and interesting as artists, athletes, researchers, etc. This would fuel their desire to be “useful” and be the ones walking around with the coffee pot asking if anyone wants a refill (when all their cups were already full!). What advice can Creator give to others on how to best understand, value, and reward the helper types in their lives without compromising their own needs and wants, and not coming up short in the process?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential89 views0 answers0 votesThe helper is here to help. But it is also true that the helpers need divine help as much as anyone. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support can heal the helpers among us and ensure that they continue to be the bedrock that humanity needs and can count on through thick and thin?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential81 views0 answers0 votesThe Lightworker Healing Protocol introduces the term “soul attributes.” We have been given as examples, by Creator, descriptions of some personal character traits. Yet, we have also been told the soul is vast in what it contains. If we look at Google’s definition of the word “attribute,” we see this: “A quality or feature regarded as a characteristic or inherent part of someone or something.” The word “inherent” stands out, and if we look at that definition, we get: “Existing in something as a permanent, essential, or characteristic attribute.” So now the two words that stand out are “permanent” and “essential.” Can Creator define what soul attribute means in divine terms, and does it imply the inherent qualities of “permanent” and “essential?”ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential170 views0 answers0 votesIt is assumed that the precise makeup of soul attributes possessed by any soul, and by extension any incarnated individual, are UNIQUE in that no one else in the history of creation has ever possessed, and no one else ever will again possess, the precise template of attributes possessed by any individual. Is that a true assumption?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential123 views0 answers0 votesWhen we say something is unique, that does not communicate anything about SIMILARITY. Can it be said that we are all different, but not that different, that humans are, in fact, more similar than dissimilar? For instance, we know that even identical twins are not truly identical, but they are quite similar. Can Creator comment on both the uniqueness and simultaneous similarity of humans?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential124 views0 answers0 votesThere is a saying, “When you label me, you negate me,” but it’s hard to grasp the notion of soul attributes without introducing the notion of categories. And categories by necessity utilize labels to denote elements or members. At some point, we do ourselves a disservice by insisting that no one should ever have expectations about another person. This gets to a point of absurdity when we refuse to acknowledge that a petite 100-pound female cannot play on the offensive line of an NFL team. What does Creator say about the tools and usage of categories and labels?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential137 views0 answers0 votesBoth the Lightworker Healing Protocol and the Deep Subconscious Memory Reset Protocol contain healing instructions for soul attribute expressions. This implies that there is nothing inherently wrong or flawed with any soul attribute, but rather with how they are EXPRESSED, which is a function of free will. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential120 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that Creator will not lead, and so with that understanding, it is wise to first survey existing literature and bodies of information for ideas of what soul attributes really may encompass. When one starts to research this topic of attributes, one unavoidably encounters the notion of archetypes. The Google dictionary has two relevant definitions for the word: 1. “A very typical example of a certain person or thing,” and 2. “A recurrent symbol or motif in literature, art, or mythology.” So archetypes denote “typical examples” and they are denoted and recognized by recurrent symbols or labels. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential86 views0 answers0 votesAfter surveying the literature of available information on this topic, including channeled material, some of which is certainly not entirely reliable, we end up with a short list or “best guess” of what seven basic archetypical types of human expressions or roles might be. There is the helper type, which expressed as an occupation would be a nurse. The next would be the artistic type. Typical occupations would involve any and all types of experiential manipulation from fashion designer to architect to interior decorator to musician. The next type would be the athletic type. These are your professional soldiers and professional athletes and even school teachers. They gravitate to competition of all kinds and small-group leadership roles. One body of literature denoted these three types as common. These three—helper, artistic, and athletic—are asserted to constitute nearly two-thirds of all humanity. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential126 views0 answers0 votesThe remaining roles would be researcher, typical occupations being anything scholarly. One source said something to the effect, that only the “researcher” type of person could spend an entire lifetime studying the mating habits of an African beetle. A helper type would never be able to do that without going crazy. The remaining three types are the orator type, with journalist being a principal occupation, the spiritual type, with anything involving religious and/or inspirational leadership and devout following being center stage, and finally the “chief” type. The “chiefs” are souls that are always focused on the BIG picture and gravitate to roles and occupations that impact large numbers of people. It is assumed that chiefs make up the smallest percentage, as low as 2% of all humanity. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential146 views0 answers0 votesSo if we were to assume that each human is typically and primarily one of those roles, that would narrow the expected behavior of such a person substantially. So while it would certainly not be impossible for a helper type to become President of the United States, you wouldn’t expect it. Nor would you expect an orator type to pursue mechanical engineering as an occupation. If they did, you would likely find them becoming the editor of an engineering periodical, rather than burying themselves all day in blueprints. So while these primary attributes don’t create HARD boundaries that prevent individuals from doing anything they want, they do, in fact, help mold and define those very WANTS to begin with. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential92 views0 answers0 votesThis is a mere introduction to the topic of soul attributes, and we will explore soul attribute expressions in a future episode. Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, and Deep Subconscious Memory Reset Protocol along with Divine Life Support are the means by which Soul Attribute problems and negative issues of all kinds are best resolved?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Human Potential93 views0 answers0 votesArriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Karma139 views0 answers0 votesWe know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Karma119 views0 answers0 votesThe Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Karma104 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola