DWQA Questions › Tag: soul characteristics
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is a saying, “When you label me, you negate me,” but it’s hard to grasp the notion of soul attributes without introducing the notion of categories. And categories by necessity utilize labels to denote elements or members. At some point, we do ourselves a disservice by insisting that no one should ever have expectations about another person. This gets to a point of absurdity when we refuse to acknowledge that a petite 100-pound female cannot play on the offensive line of an NFL team. What does Creator say about the tools and usage of categories and labels?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
Both the Lightworker Healing Protocol and the Deep Subconscious Memory Reset Protocol contain healing instructions for soul attribute expressions. This implies that there is nothing inherently wrong or flawed with any soul attribute, but rather with how they are EXPRESSED, which is a function of free will. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that Creator will not lead, and so with that understanding, it is wise to first survey existing literature and bodies of information for ideas of what soul attributes really may encompass. When one starts to research this topic of attributes, one unavoidably encounters the notion of archetypes. The Google dictionary has two relevant definitions for the word: 1. “A very typical example of a certain person or thing,” and 2. “A recurrent symbol or motif in literature, art, or mythology.” So archetypes denote “typical examples” and they are denoted and recognized by recurrent symbols or labels. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
76 views0 answers0 votes
After surveying the literature of available information on this topic, including channeled material, some of which is certainly not entirely reliable, we end up with a short list or “best guess” of what seven basic archetypical types of human expressions or roles might be. There is the helper type, which expressed as an occupation would be a nurse. The next would be the artistic type. Typical occupations would involve any and all types of experiential manipulation from fashion designer to architect to interior decorator to musician. The next type would be the athletic type. These are your professional soldiers and professional athletes and even school teachers. They gravitate to competition of all kinds and small-group leadership roles. One body of literature denoted these three types as common. These three—helper, artistic, and athletic—are asserted to constitute nearly two-thirds of all humanity. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
105 views0 answers0 votes
The remaining roles would be researcher, typical occupations being anything scholarly. One source said something to the effect, that only the “researcher” type of person could spend an entire lifetime studying the mating habits of an African beetle. A helper type would never be able to do that without going crazy. The remaining three types are the orator type, with journalist being a principal occupation, the spiritual type, with anything involving religious and/or inspirational leadership and devout following being center stage, and finally the “chief” type. The “chiefs” are souls that are always focused on the BIG picture and gravitate to roles and occupations that impact large numbers of people. It is assumed that chiefs make up the smallest percentage, as low as 2% of all humanity. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
140 views0 answers0 votes
So if we were to assume that each human is typically and primarily one of those roles, that would narrow the expected behavior of such a person substantially. So while it would certainly not be impossible for a helper type to become President of the United States, you wouldn’t expect it. Nor would you expect an orator type to pursue mechanical engineering as an occupation. If they did, you would likely find them becoming the editor of an engineering periodical, rather than burying themselves all day in blueprints. So while these primary attributes don’t create HARD boundaries that prevent individuals from doing anything they want, they do, in fact, help mold and define those very WANTS to begin with. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
83 views0 answers0 votes
This is a mere introduction to the topic of soul attributes, and we will explore soul attribute expressions in a future episode. Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, and Deep Subconscious Memory Reset Protocol along with Divine Life Support are the means by which Soul Attribute problems and negative issues of all kinds are best resolved?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
84 views0 answers0 votes
Can you give us for our January, 2024, webinar an example of an individual, or group, or location, that was benefitted by being on a wish list for Divine Life Support?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
165 views0 answers0 votes
Arriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
We know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
The Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
93 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
121 views0 answers0 votes
We know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
128 views0 answers0 votes
We know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
90 views0 answers0 votes
There is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…56789…31Next »