DWQA Questions › Tag: self-belief
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Please clarify the channeled answer you gave us about the overall healing achieved by the group of channelers attempting to emulate their leader who has an uncommon ability to launch LHP sessions with a code word. We asked, “How effective, on average, are members of this group in getting healing equivalent to live sessions?” And you told us: “We would say that the effectiveness, on average, is about 50% of what would be achieved were all those sessions done live…” Did this really mean to indicate that their code word sessions are still half as effective as live sessions, so that given they can launch hundreds of code words they accomplish far more than doing live sessions only? Or was the answer meant to convey that their total effort, the total healing output for the time expended, even though they might launch hundreds of code word sessions, ended up getting only 50% of what they could have accomplished just doing what live sessions they could for the same amount of time spent?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
136 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Would it be prudent for there to be a version of the LHP that only a few select people among the practitioner community are privy to, based on leadership role and dedication to the cause? I am asking this for two reasons: 1) security and 2) the recent blackout forecasting experience has demonstrated that some practitioners are of questionable faith and understanding, and might not be steadfast to the project long-term. Would keeping more exotic maneuverers away from all eyes be prudent and more effective for the greater good? Could this “limited” version be merged with the rest of the practitioner prayer pool by divine realm, so that other practitioners fuel the exotic maneuvers but without directly knowing about them? I’m thinking it would be sort of like when we harness all future protocol updates in the present, and send current updates into the past. Or does every part of the LHP have to be requested by all practitioners with full understanding of all tactics, in order for all requests to be effective and the protocol itself to work properly?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
Arriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
We know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
The Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
92 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
120 views0 answers0 votes
We know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
We know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
89 views0 answers0 votes
There is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
66 views0 answers0 votes
Creator is concerned with the spiritual growth of the individual (and even species) but karma looks geared to not be at all concerned with that agenda. Rather, it simply responds to energy perturbations in a literal tit-for-tat fashion. Karma is not concerned either, about a mission life underway; and if there is an opportunity to introduce a karmic response, it will simply do so in a kind of mechanical, automatic way. Does any cancellation or attenuation necessitate a divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
83 views0 answers0 votes
There is the karmic problem of returning a response to a perpetrator with a dramatically different makeup from the initial victim triggering the karmic debt. For instance, the same shove delivered to one individual is an annoyance but breaks the bones of someone frail. How would this debt be handled? Does karma wait for the perpetrator to be born frail? But even if frail, a psychopathic personality might absorb such a shove very differently than the initial victim, even if the broken bones are the same or similar. Then there is the dilemma of the first victim having a karmic recurrence of the shove themselves. So do we have both the perpetrator and victim getting the SAME karmic response? OR does the perpetrator simply return as another perpetrator and the victim as well, to again be a victim? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
75 views0 answers0 votes
Regardless of the workings of karma itself, we have learned that divine intervention is the means to heal, avoid, and/or reduce and attenuate karmic debts and dilemmas. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Memory Reset, and Divine Life Support bring about the desired divine intervention to heal karmic difficulties?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
82 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I am unsure if ALL my messages are or were from the Divine. How do I decipher? I’m not confident with my muscle testing.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
89 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner made this recommendation: “Instead of fighting to squeeze in 90 minute chunks 1 to 3 times a week, completing 1 to 3 LHP/DSMRs, I now almost every morning carve out 30 minutes at least to start an LHP/DSMR session. Sometimes I’m able to finish, sometimes I wait until night, and sometimes I just have to resume next morning. I am able to get 3 to 6 sessions done this way a week versus fighting to find full time for 1 to 3 sessions. The way I do it is when I’m feeling I need to stop or am pressed for time, I’ll make note of my stop time, ask Creator to hold and link my next session, stop and ground with white light, and when I resume I again say the protection prayer, requesting, “Creator, link this session to my previous one,” and then begin where I left off. What is Creator’s perspective? Will this be just as effective? Are there any precautions you would recommend or reservations to note?”
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
267 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “One person persists in attacking our DSTR work, citing your supposed reluctance to share details you get from Creator about clients, which is clearly not always the case. We go to some lengths to assure the safety of our sessions, including in our pre-session prayers a request for Creator to select the past lives still causing struggles in the current life that are the most important and appropriate to share, that are safe and helpful for the client to hear and that will do no harm, that can help them understand their current dilemmas and life path and uplift them moving forward. We feel our depth of connection and amount of time devoted to this healing adds to the benefit we offer, and people have been reporting great relief after receiving our healings. Would you be willing to ask Creator on our behalf whether there is healing benefit in the version of DSTR we have developed, where we channel Creator directly and transmit divine words to the client, including two challenging lifetimes and one positive one, and one or more inspiring and encouraging messages (along with all the other issues and lifetimes determined by Creator but not narrated)?” What is Creator’s perspective about this critic’s actions, and the overall value of the work being done?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
149 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…34567…32Next »