DWQA Questions › Tag: ruling elite
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is growing criticism of the California politicians in the wake of the massive wildfires underway, from what are seen as poor decisions: Reducing the LA Fire Department budget by $17,000,000 and sending city firefighting equipment to Ukraine; ending forestry management practices to remove underbrush and do controlled burns to lower the proven hazard of dry spells; destruction of four dams in major rivers out of deference to fish populations which lets the water flow into the sea instead of being captured in reservoirs; failure to build new reservoirs that were budgeted for a decade ago; failure to keep existing reservoirs filled so firefighters have run out of water while current wildfires are raging uncontrolled; putting a cap on fire insurance policy costs, causing insurers to pull out leaving many homeowners with total losses; etc. Are these overly harsh criticisms, do they reflect incompetence of leadership, or is everyone being manipulated to make errors in judgment by leadership and others to ignore being vulnerable?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
The Pacific Palisades wildfire, driven by high Santa Ana winds, caused an evacuation order for 30,000 Los Angeles area residents on Jan. 7th, 2025, the second major fire in a month. Then, the Eaton Fire, which started about 6:30 p.m. Tuesday north of Pasadena in the Altadena area, exploded in size to 16.6 square miles by late Wednesday morning, according to fire officials with an evacuation order for 50,000 residents. The Hurst Fire started about 10:30 p.m. Tuesday and prompted evacuations in Sylmar, a San Fernando Valley community in the northernmost neighborhood in Los Angeles. That fire had grown to nearly a square mile by early Wednesday. By Thursday, at least five fires were burning covering more than 45 square miles, sparked by dry conditions and powerful winds, causing unprecedented scenes in areas not known for fires, with 179,000 people forced to flee, and thousands of structures lost. Each fire has had wind gusts from 85-100 miles per hour. What is causing these fires?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “The database classifies fear as the opposite of love. Can you please revisit this question? I postulate that perhaps the opposite of Love is Judgment at the root cause. There can be no fear without a judgment first. If it is possible to have fear before judgment, for example, a subconscious energetic imprint, can Creator clarify and verify this for us? Are both fear and judgment correct depending on the circumstances?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
82 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about a European company feeding dairy cows a chemical to reduce methane production in their digestive systems: “Could Creator comment on the safety of milk in relation the Bovaer supplementation? Is it safe to drink or not? What do we need to know? Or is this deliberate misinformation to affect the dairy industry?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
77 views0 answers0 votes
Tropical Storm Trami recently struck the Philippines, on Oct. 26, 2024, dumping 1 2 month’s rain in 24 hours and causing massive flooding and landslides. There are more than 140 dead officially, with likely a rising death toll as the search for missing citizens continues. Was this a natural weather event, a consequence of climate change, or something else at work?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
120 views0 answers0 votes
A published economic survey of 501 tropical cyclones from 1930 to 2015 reported that mortality for people in an area where major storms came ashore, increased for up to 20 years later. The average individual storm showed an increase of 7,000 to 11,000 deaths after each hurricane, over the next two decades. What is Creator’s perspective about the accuracy and significance of this analysis?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are wireless earbuds that I use for my iPhone adversely affecting my health?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
128 views0 answers0 votes
Years ago when Brian was doing some research through old newspapers of the 1960s, he was struck by how many businesses were celebrating “their 100th year” in business. It seemed like you couldn’t pick up a paper or magazine without some local establishment making this boast. Family businesses were truly FAMILY businesses. Children took over from their parents, grandchildren from their parents, and on and on. Businesses grew slowly, if at all, but what business they had was stable, predictable, and reliable. Their suppliers were often in business as long or longer than they were. Things changed slowly, if at all. And when they did change, it was considered progress with an expectation for improvement, otherwise WHY CHANGE? Store layouts often never changed for a century or more. For a place like a hardware store, this was important so things could be located quickly. But now frequent change is the norm. Was this movement away from this kind of stability inevitable with progress? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
93 views0 answers0 votes
Continuing on this line of questioning, today “reinventing your image” is all the rage. Businesses, organizations, and even schools change their logos often—their mascots, color schemes, building designs, interior layouts, you name it, ALL of it undergoes FREQUENT transformation. It seems like the paint barely gets a chance to dry before the “pardon our dust” signs are out in force again. It always seemed wasteful to me, not to mention inconvenient and bothersome. If these businesses really wanted to please me, moving the mayonnaise from aisle 2 to aisle 5 is not a way to do that. I’m sure every college-level marketing course teaches that “studies say” this is all necessary and beneficial to the bottom line. But is it REALLY? I hate feeling like a stranger in my own town. Am I alone in that sentiment? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
104 views0 answers0 votes
Then there’s the “model year.” MODEL YEAR? When did that become a “thing?” You hardly get a chance to become familiar with the current inventory before it’s all swept away and replaced by the “new models.” Wouldn’t a MODEL DECADE make more sense, especially when you consider how much things like tooling costs? Again, it seems incredibly wasteful to spend so much time and energy changing EVERYTHING. It’s exhausting and even disorienting. Not to mention trying to keep any of these items working beyond the warranty. Parts are in limited supply, and many items are now being made to be “non-repairable” and disposable, cell phones being a prime example. Do I really need a new phone EVERY YEAR? And nowadays the new stuff is noticeably inferior to the stuff it’s replacing. But people just assume all this is natural and inevitable. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
110 views0 answers0 votes
When someone thinks of culture and tradition, the things that come to mind are consistency, predictability, longevity, and expectation of continuance. Christmas decorations were something you bought ONCE and reused year after year. Only the tree changed every year, but it was always the same kind of tree, the same size, and was always in the same corner. But traditions of any kind seem to be an endangered species in the Modern Era, to the point where many are even derided. Thanksgiving is more about football than being thankful. Memorial Day is for barbeque and beer, not visiting the gravesides of the fallen. It’s “Happy Holidays!” not “Merry Christmas!” The home-cooked meal is now in a microwave package. There are young adults who have never boiled an egg or even made toast. And again, many just assume and will even argue that all this is normal and inevitable. Really? All of human history seems to suggest otherwise. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
Political loyalty draws a great deal from both culture and tradition. People like to think they can count on their political parties, and have confidence in the future as a result. But we enter an election season where absolutely no one, either supporters or detractors, can say with certainty whether a year from now Trump will be in the White House or the “Big House,” in prison, in other words. Republicans used to be considered “the war hawks” and the Democrats “the party of love and tolerance.” But it feels like roles have reversed. Nevertheless, people are still desperate to believe and have confidence in their party, no matter what, it seems. But such confidence has become fragile, and doubts and alarm in people growing with the breakdown and erosion of expectations. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
118 views0 answers0 votes
The one thing that is noticeable about the wars going on these days is that none of them have seemingly gone as expected. When a certain outcome is expected, somehow, it comes up short. Violence appears when it’s least expected, and just as mysteriously doesn’t materialize when it IS expected. The use of cell phones and pagers as bombs was something almost no one anticipated. People dread the thought of a nuclear exchange, but maybe they should be more worried about the phone in their pocket. Are these wars being conducted in such a way as to maximize everyone’s CONFUSION and paranoia? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
118 views0 answers0 votes
Google provides this as a definition of gaslighting: “Gaslighting is a type of psychological abuse that involves manipulating someone into questioning their own reality, memories, or sanity. The goal of gaslighting is to gain power and control over the victim, and it can be very effective.” Gaslighting is often done over a long period of time, so the victim may not realize they are being manipulated. Gaslighters may lie about everything, not just big things that could be covered up. Gaslighters may deny things that happened or promises they made. Gaslighters may question the victim’s memory of events, even if the victim remembers them accurately. It seems as if there is a unified strategy on the part of the interlopers, the Extraterrestrial Alliance. Is that what’s REALLY going on, the absolute historic GASLIGHTING of humanity? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
104 views0 answers0 votes
Predicting the future has always been VERY problematic, especially in an environment of rapid flux and even chaos. Is it “controlled” chaos? We know the interlopers are time travelers, and if their agenda was truly the gaslighting of humanity, then the ability to predict the future is what is, in fact, in the “crosshairs.” It’s the very attack vector the interlopers go to pains to maximize. Could this be a possible explanation as to why even divine predictions of the near future have been so uncharacteristically inaccurate? If the interlopers are, in fact, making a Herculean effort to create the most unpredictable reality for humanity imaginable, then abrupt change of plans would not be the exception but the RULE. Creator has attributed this to the “fickleness” of the interlopers, but fickleness seems pretty benign in contrast to an intentional campaign to be as unpredictable as possible. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
125 views0 answers0 votes
123…8Next »
Ask Question