DWQA Questions › Tag: resilienceFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesWould CoreAshwa-Q Plus be superior to Advanced Mitochondrial Formula or Metaphenol 27 for inclusion in our Antiviral Regimen as well as maintaining general health to counteract effects of aging? Are the latter two supplements enough when used together? What is most important for us to know?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Healing Modalities54 views0 answers0 votesWhile the nutraceutical Metaphenol 27 is promoted as anti-aging, it is said to have a number of health-restoring benefits. Are both Advanced Mitochondrial Formula and Metaphenol 27 of general value for chronic disease management in addition to countering the pathologic effects of chronic virus infections?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Healing Modalities49 views0 answers0 votesYou told us it would be good to include the Metaphenol 27 supplement from Solaire Nutraceuticals in our Antiviral Regimen. I just went to order some and found out they are charging $199 for a one-month supply. I was able to find a workaround for the $100 a month cost of Advanced Mitochondrial Formula using bulk ingredients, but the amounts of most constituents in Metaphenol 27 are not specified. To me, the ideal would be for everyone to take the Antiviral Regimen for prophylactic protection, but I doubt few would spend so much “just in case” if Metaphenol 27 is included. Will most benefit from taking it just twice a week along with the daily prayer for divine augmentation, in order to economize? Can you help us put this in perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Healing Modalities34 views0 answers0 votesWhere should Metaphenol 27 be ranked when added to the list of supplements in our Antiviral Regimen? Being similar to Advanced Mitochondrial Formula (number 3 in the rankings), should it be ranked just below it, or is it better to still have the Kiva Black Seed Oil as number 4, and make the Metaphenol 27 as number 5?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Healing Modalities56 views0 answers0 votesIf Metaphenol 27 is added to our Antiviral Regimen as number 5 on the list, should we classify all five of these as Foundational?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Healing Modalities55 views0 answers0 votesDr. Richard Gerhauser is promoting a supplement through Solaire Nutraceuticals called Metaphenol 27 that, indeed, is said to contain 27 ingredients for reversing aging. These are plant extracts focused largely on increasing numbers and functional health of mitochondria along with having antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. Is this safe and effective?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Healing Modalities40 views0 answers0 votesWould Metaphenol 27 be superior to the Advanced Mitochondrial Formula from Advanced Bionutritionals in terms of prevention or reversal of aging-related changes in the body? Would it be advantageous to use both together?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Healing Modalities40 views0 answers0 votesWould it be advantageous to replace Advanced Mitochondrial Formula in our Antiviral Regimen with Metaphenol 27, or use both together for protection against the disease causing effects of chronic viruses, or other impairments of mitochondrial function underlying many chronic illnesses?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Healing Modalities56 views0 answers0 votesOne of the most publicized and stark juxtapositions of “standing strong” versus “not standing strong” ever recorded in history is the World War II incidents where General George Patton, Jr. slapped two soldiers during the invasion of Sicily. This is the summary from Wikipedia: “In early August 1943, Lieutenant General George S. Patton slapped two United States Army soldiers under his command … Patton’s hard-driving personality and lack of belief in the medical condition of combat stress reaction, then known as “battle fatigue” or “shell shock,” led to the soldiers’ becoming the subject of his ire in incidents on August 3 and 10, when Patton struck and berated them (in front of other wounded soldiers and medical personnel) after discovering they were patients at evacuation hospitals away from the front lines without apparent physical injuries.” Here is a directive sent to the officers of his command: “It has come to my attention that a very small number of soldiers are going to the hospital on the pretext that they are nervously incapable of combat. Such men are cowards and bring discredit on the army and disgrace to their comrades, whom they heartlessly leave to endure the dangers of battle while they, themselves, use the hospital as a means of escape. You will take measures to see that such cases are not sent to the hospital but dealt with in their units. Those who are not willing to fight will be tried by court-martial for cowardice in the face of the enemy.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Karma71 views0 answers0 votesPatton frequently claimed that he “hated war.” But almost nobody believed him. Such a statement seemed to violate almost everything anyone ever witnessed about his leadership. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Karma70 views0 answers0 votesBoth Patton and General Douglas MacArthur were considered Prima Donnas. Google defines prima donna as, “A very temperamental person with an inflated view of their own talent or importance.” Or, “Anyone who acted as if they were a world-famous talent.” But the irony is they were, indeed, “world-famous talents.” They were two of the most effective and successful combat leaders the world has EVER known. Yet many observers considered them “arrogant pretenders” nevertheless, and despised them for being so. Is this an example of “faking it ’til you make it,” and how much of this behavior was engaged in fully for “effect” but did not, in fact, reflect the men privately? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Karma70 views0 answers0 votesGeneral MacArthur used to frequently, and many would say recklessly, expose himself to danger in areas with known snipers. In one incident he actually stared out of a window at a sniper training his rifle at him from another building across the street. He then “casually” turned and walked away from the window a split second before a bullet came through the window aimed at him. When asked later about the behavior, he claimed he liked to “test his timing.” This behavior drove his subordinates “nuts.” Yet MacArthur survived the entirety of the war in his early sixties and without so much as a scratch. Patton behaved similarly and also survived the war, only to have his neck broken in the slightest of fender benders. What is Creator’s perspective on this behavior?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Karma96 views0 answers0 votesA lot of terrible and deeply evil figures in history were also prima donnas. So it’s completely understandable that such figures are deeply distrusted. Where does one parse out the positive example versus the arrogant threat? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Karma80 views0 answers0 votesWhat is Creator’s perspective on “combat stress reaction” or “battle fatigue?” So much of GetWisdom has been dedicated to healing historic trauma the deep subconscious reacts to, as this is understood to be the primary culprit behind MOST of our negative karmic issues and even the rise of evil itself in the galaxy. Yet trauma doesn’t have to be deep and can be right in your face, such as experienced by the soldiers Patton slapped (assuming their distress was quite real, and they were not faking it). Fleeing combat by any means certainly aligns with the karmic and divine imperative to protect oneself, but at the cost of abandoning their duty and comrades, not to mention setting an abysmal example of how to comport oneself in the face of danger. What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Karma74 views0 answers0 votesThe word “coward” has come to acquire a deeply negative connotation, so much so that it has fallen out of popular use almost entirely, and anyone attempting to use it faces significant backlash, both privately and especially publicly. And the word “brave” is being liberally used to praise victims and laud behavior that seems to lack any evidence, much less significant evidence, of the recipient actually having stood strong against a dilemma. Today there are certainly people who would call Patton a bully and the battle fatigue suffering soldiers he slapped brave, for merely being on the receiving end of his “despicable tirade.” What is Creator’s perspective on the abandonment of the word “coward” and the accompanying neutering of the word “brave,” a word that used to be reserved ONLY to describe one who displayed SIGNIFICANT evidence of having “stood strong?”ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Karma73 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola