DWQA Questions › Tag: religious dogma
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “The following questions are something I have been pondering for quite some time. When I heard the channeling of Josef Mengele, approximately at the 2:00:00 time mark, talking about Santa Claus, it triggered this question again. Here is the quote from the channeling: “…We can tell you there is a Santa Claus in the Divine that does more than bring gifts but it requires belief.” I can tell you unabashedly that I never stopped believing in Santa Claus. My belief has only matured and expanded as I have gotten older. My daughters just turned 7 and 10, respectively, in September. They both still believe in Santa. I know at some point in the near future the topic of Santa Claus being real will come up. I do not like to lie to my children. I would love some clarity on this subject so as I can be as honest and truthful with my children as appropriate. From my research, there seems to have been a Santa Claus or a Saint Nicholas in the past. Can you tell me if there ever was a Santa Claus in the physical and what their purpose or life mission was/is?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
7 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Can you please elaborate and expand on the quote from the Josef Mengele channeling where they were quoted saying that, “We can tell you there is a Santa Claus in the Divine that does more than bring gifts but it requires belief.” What more does Santa do besides bring gifts? And what sort of gifts does he provide?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
7 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Some people have stated that Santa is an allegory for God. While I can see the similarities, I feel that in this case, Santa is his own person and not just an allegory. What is the truth? What is the divine perspective and important to know?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
4 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “I am looking for inspiration in how I can approach this topic with my children when the time approaches. I hope that these answers will help bring clarity and benefit to others in parallel. I know this may seem silly to you but it is important to me. I’m taking a leap of faith reaching out to you on this subject but I feel it will be most beneficial for all and a surprise for many others. Integrity is important to me and I don’t want to mislead my children or promote falsehoods.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
4 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “If there are clearly karmic effects in this lifetime (physical, mental, emotional, relationships, finances, etc.) is it wise to “wait” for LHP sessions to heal karmic underpinnings in other timelines, or “should” we try to overcome it as best we can in this lifetime, even though using the conscious mind and memory will be very limited in their effectiveness? Will ignorance and inaction compound the issue? Or will human action provide more intention-power to amplify healing speed? Given the limited effectiveness of medical science and psychological therapies it seems unclear what to do.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
75 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Fate often represents a fixed outcome; destiny is a sense of purpose that individuals actively work towards, influencing their choices and actions. To what degree is karma deterministic and the outcomes inevitable? For example, if someone has lung disease, and that has been created by the Law of Karma to rebalance wounds done to us by others in other lives, what is the difference karmically between passive acceptance of that illness in this lifetime as a rebalancing (fate) versus seeking the best medical and spiritual treatment for the condition (destiny)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
66 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Why do the concepts of reincarnation, cyclical existence, and cosmic (akashic) memory and karmic consequences not appear in Christian Biblical teachings, which focus more on a linear timeline from creation to final judgment? Although there are perhaps oblique references to these ideas such as The Book of Life referred to in the Old and New Testaments, they are not elaborated or their implications explained. Is this due to manipulation of written records to limit human understanding by “the usual suspects,” the cultural emphases of the time, or other reasons?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
A former intelligence agent started a business coaching people in spy techniques and insights that he believed could be applied to everyday life to help people be more effective in accomplishing whatever it is they set out to do. Like most things in life, these techniques and understandings can be used for good or evil. A match can light a birthday candle or start a forest fire. To the extent that others might use these teachings for harm, how much karmic liability attaches to the teacher? Is this a reason why dangerous knowledge was historically reserved for initiates? And even that would seem to have karmic polarity in that it safeguards the innocent and immature on the one hand, but can also be a means to hoard and deny access to resources that one can argue should be more widely shared. What is Creator’s perspective on the “safe handling” and/or dissemination and sharing of material that is potentially helpful but equally dangerous?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
170 views0 answers0 votes
Intelligence agencies are in the business of gathering intelligence—information that is difficult to attain through ordinary means; information that people are hesitant and resistant to give up or share. The successful intelligence agent will employ the tools of motivation and manipulation to get this information. These tools are matched to particular means with which to motivate and/or manipulate people to get them to do what you want them to do. These approaches are referred to with the acronym “R.I.C.E.” Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. Of these four, appealing to ideology is seen as the most effective, and coercion the least. If you successfully appeal to ideology, the “target” will trust you and share almost anything. Coercion is the weakest as, contrary to Hollywood, it may work the first time you use it, but then you destroy trust and will have fewer opportunities for future success with the target. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
105 views0 answers0 votes
While being trained as an intelligence officer, this individual learned he was an ideal candidate because he was special (clearly an appeal to ego), or at least that is what he thought. But, in fact, he learned he was special because he had been algorithmically identified as psychologically damaged and traumatized in particular ways that were useful for intelligence gathering. These are people one would rarely label “well adjusted” by society’s standards. The agency was ruthlessly honest in telling him they intended to leverage that dysfunction, give him a vocabulary for understanding the nuances of human motivation and manipulation, and techniques for achieving goals and agendas with targets. In this undertaking, the overall wellbeing of the target is not a top consideration and moral flexibility was a prized capacity for successful agents. What is Creator’s perspective on the moral flexibility so highly prized by intelligence agencies?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
98 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer shared that if you need a target’s cooperation, and there is no means by which to positively and transparently motivate them, then that gives you the green light to manipulate them. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
97 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer warned that the typical person has no idea just how much and on what scale advanced motivation and manipulation techniques are being deployed against them. It’s not a conspiracy theory. Creator has affirmed this as well on multiple occasions. When confronted with this reality, two questions come to mind. Can I avoid it? And if I can’t avoid it, can I successfully resist it? Is there even an answer outside of divine partnership? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer shared that he was taught about the difference between perception and perspective. Perception is what you sense with your five senses (and maybe your sixth). But its range is narrow and its reliability poor. It operates on instinct and emotion, so you twitch when someone you don’t expect touches you, or you see a dark shadow and jump thinking it’s a rat when it’s really dirty laundry on the floor. Perspective is your knowing that you’ve never encountered a rat in your room and that the odds of it being a rat are tiny. He claims he was taught to favor perspective over perception. We know that past life trauma resonates and could be why you reacted as you did, and that in a past life that dark shape on the floor WAS a rat. But even if that is true, it is not true in the current place and timeframe. “Don’t trust your gut” was his message and to always question, if not doubt outright, your first emotional reaction to anything. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
101 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer shared that it is accepted as an operating fact that 90% of people are trapped in their own perception. In other words, 90% of people think and respond emotionally, not rationally. In fact, those 90% do not even know there is a difference. This is the fundamental difference between trained and untrained people according to this former intelligence officer. And that it’s the most important skill an intelligence officer needs to learn and master, to think from perspective. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
94 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer said the human condition is extremely predictable. People want to feel heard, they want to feel listened to, and they want to feel validated. He says feeding these desires can be automated, and the result will be people willingly selling out themselves, often without any awareness that they are doing so. Everything we’ve learned so far about influencing people seems to be fundamental tradecraft in how to motivate (by positive reinforcement) or manipulate (by negative reinforcement). For someone who wants to safeguard themselves from falling victim to this kind of influence, how helpful is it to learn and understand how one’s own emotions and human needs can be leveraged against them? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
88 views0 answers0 votes
123…7Next »