DWQA Questions › Tag: reincarnationFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “My previous dog passed away when we left her with a house-sitter while out of town for 10 days to attend my son’s wedding. She, too, had health problems but seemed stable on her meds for a heart valve issue. Is there a risk in boarding companion animals of their deciding to transition, perhaps concluding, falsely, that their mission for the current life has been completed?”ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Animal Issues69 views0 answers0 votesHow much of the power of persuasion is a product of divinely bestowed soul attributes, versus a learned skill that one acquires through trial and error over many lifetimes? If a learned skill, how is that skill transferred from lifetime to lifetime? Is it recorded in the akashic records and made part of cellular memory during the fetus’s formation? Or is it something wholly spiritual in nature, retained by the spirit itself, and if one learns the power of persuasion while incarnated, are their newly discovered persuasive powers on display in the light between lives as genuine learning? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs55 views0 answers0 votesPersuasion is the power to effect CHANGE or perhaps prevent change. And even though there is a distinction made between persuasion and compulsion, the threat of compulsion can, in and of itself, be HIGHLY persuasive. The iconic fire and brimstone sermons delivered with great theatrics by eloquent ministers comes to mind. A “fear monger” or one who “peddles fear” also comes to mind. What is Creator’s perspective of persuasion AS compulsion?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs100 views0 answers0 votesIt’s interesting to note that the iconic “snake oil salesman” never had a storefront, like a pharmacy, but instead pulled into the town square with his wagon and hawked his magical products directly to the crowds, and then often “hightailed it” to the next town before the truth of his products became more widely known. Google defined snake oil salesmen as those who deceived people in order to get money from them. The successful ones were highly persuasive people. When one has such ability, it seems so puzzling that such a person could not find a “legitimate” avenue in which to practice those skills and be successful without all the ignominy. Good salespeople are in demand everywhere and for everything—why resort to fraud? What can Creator tell us about exploiting the masterful use of persuasion to willfully engage in fraud?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs82 views0 answers0 votesWhen one does a study of some of the most effective salespeople, one often encounters a mixed bag of ethically questionable tactics. One extremely successful car salesman would sit down with a phone book, call people and tell them their new car was ready for pickup. When people inevitably said, “I didn’t order a car,” he would profusely apologize and then immediately segue into asking them if they were at all in the market for a new car. With this approach, he made a fortune and set the world record at the time for most non-fleet sales made by a car salesman “one customer at a time.” Now to his credit, he was extremely likable, attentive, thorough, and did great customer service, sent birthday cards to his customers, etc. Nevertheless, a lot of his success was predicated on a lie and deception. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs43 views0 answers0 votesIn reference to the above car salesman’s success, he was successful because he was good at “cold calling” which most people have a deep aversion to. Cold calling is one of the most obvious breaches of the “Golden Rule” there is. Almost everyone HATES getting cold calls, and yet most successful salespeople will assert that you need to do it in order to be successful. Brian remembers one “boiler room” telephone canvasser who bragged how she abused anyone cold calling her but had no problem doing cold calling for a living. The stark hypocrisy was dramatic and utterly remorseless and unapologetic. She literally thought it was “hilarious” and laughed about it. Brian found it disturbing, to say the least. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs62 views0 answers0 votesCold calling works precisely because so many people have an aversion to doing it. That alone makes it a successful strategy for those who can bring themselves to do it. Brian did sales in the late 80s and struggled with this dilemma. A rule of thumb is it takes 10 calls to get a lead, 10 leads to get an appointment, and 10 appointments to get a sale. Brian demonstrated to himself that, indeed, the formula works and managed to get a house listing as a result. But rather than being encouraged by his success, he was so overcome with guilt about disturbing people eating dinner that he eventually abandoned sales as a career altogether. Cold calling cannot work if everyone does it. Everyone’s phone would ring all day long and it would be utterly chaotic and untenable. There is the idea that, if “everyone” can’t, then maybe no one “should?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs112 views0 answers0 votesAnother successful sales guru made a fortune selling heavy stainless steel cookware door to door. (A direct form of cold calling that predates the telephone). He frequently recounted one sale he made where the woman initially slammed the front door on him and, in response, he went around to the back door to apologize for knocking on the front door. He was so charming and disarming, that the woman felt bad about mistreating him and consented to listening to his presentation as a way to make amends. She ended up buying the very expensive cookware he was selling. We are confronted with the dilemma of his apology being “insincere,” because he certainly felt no remorse about knocking on her front door at all, much less her back door after she made it clear she didn’t want to interact with him. What is Creator’s perspective on this anecdote, and what positive and negative divine lessons can we learn from it?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs44 views0 answers0 votes“Breaking the ice” is a phrase in common usage. The online Free Dictionary defines the term this way: “To do something as a means of reducing or eliminating shyness, awkward tension, or unfamiliarity.” So much of persuasion founders on this “iceberg” that the term is quite an ingenious summation of a common problem requiring great skill to master. When someone knows or learns how to “break the ice” effectively, the world is literally their oyster. This is clearly a very important “art of living” skill and lesson that so many people would benefit from mastering but struggle with intensely. What divine insight can Creator share about this common dilemma and challenge?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs49 views0 answers0 votesLike so many things dragging us down in this world, an inability to master the art of persuasion has to be up there pretty high on the list. How much of this is a deep healing need requiring divine intervention to resolve? How can Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support help to heal the barriers to becoming a persuasive individual? How can divine partnership ensure that the power of persuasion is used to uplift rather than abuse?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Limiting Beliefs41 views0 answers0 votesBoth Allan Kardec and Karl Mollison share not only similar interests and agendas, but a notable similarity of the organization of their written work, and that is the question-and-answer format that we see in Karl’s e-books, the Divine Wisdom Database, and originally in The Spirits’ Book by Allan Kardec. Are there criteria for soul characteristics that manifest in earthly existence that pass from one incarnation to the next?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Allan Kardec497 views0 answers0 votesYou told us about alien time travel: “This is also another reason for the relentless speeding up of the pace of things; it is because they want so many reiterations of the current timeline to keep changing the future for the sake of variety and bringing about greater misery in a kind of perverse negative optimization of your destiny.” Is this alluding to the feeling so many have about time speeding up as they get older? Are the interlopers actually speeding up time to get everything they want changed to be accomplished more quickly?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Metaphysics110 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Can Creator please explain more specifically how the negative effects caused by the extraterrestrial time traveling shenanigans are actually experienced by humans who are forced to involuntarily relive or re-experience traumas? Do the negative effects initially occur only through a modification of the akashic records, themselves, by rekindling the negative karmic implications of those relived karmic events? If so, then does that rekindling then put humans at risk for experiencing the same kind of event in their current lifetime—for example, if a person was murdered along the way during the original time period to be re-lived through time travel, will they then become likely to be murdered again during the repeat of that time segment?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Metaphysics91 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “As you may recall at the very end of 2017, at a fairly advanced age my prior dog hemorrhaged from a liver tumor and I took him in for emergency surgery. He passed but not before we tried everything including a blood transfusion. Listening to the LHP webinar yesterday you touched on the undesirability of transfusions because of the additional karma from the donor. I had forgotten that I had approved that transfusion actually in terms of implication for his new lifetime as my current dog! You confirmed that he is indeed back from the light which was so great to hear. In terms of his life now at almost 5 and 1/2 years old, he’s done great but I often think to myself that he’s somehow less affectionate and connected to me this time around even though maybe many other things are much improved. Unlike during his last lifetime, he doesn’t chase cars or buses or skateboarders etc (except from behind a fence at the dog park which is awesome), he doesn’t guard his food and is a great companion and role model or mentor for his daughter puppy. Is the extra karmic load received during the transfusion somehow resolved by the countless LHPs before he passed and then since then, or is it involved in the less passionate sort of experience I have between the two of us? I always noticed that he doesn’t give kisses and is so so about hugs.” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Animal Issues100 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Can investing in certain stocks have negative karmic consequences to oneself by way of funding negative things happening? What can Creator tell us?”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Karma122 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola