DWQA Questions › Tag: psychic gifts
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Concetta Bertoldi, a professional psychic medium of some repute, wrote a book titled, “Do Dead People Watch You Shower? And Other Questions You’ve Been All but Dying to Ask a Medium.” This book appears to be a remarkable autobiography, and rare opportunity for non-mediums (most of humanity) to read what it’s like to have and live one’s life with these abilities. Not everything she shares in the book aligns with everything Creator has shared with us in the GetWisdom Project, but more so by omission than any statements and revelations that wildly conflict. Like the rest of us, she seems clearly limited by her beliefs in terms of what she can reliably access from the divine realm in terms of deeper truths, but when focused solely on interacting with the dead, and relaying messages from the dead, she appears to be in strong alignment. She referred to herself as, “Just your average Jersey girl who talks to the dead.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
245 views0 answers0 votes
One of the more fascinating revelations Concetta shared in her book was how her father, whose own father was a medium, told her, “If I didn’t want to hear Them, all I had to do was envision myself surrounded by the white light of God and simply say, ‘In the name of God, be gone.’ I couldn’t believe it was that easy, but it was. The voices went away. Completely. For four years.” To get the ability back, she had to expressly ask for it. “When I asked the ability to come back to me, it didn’t happen right away.” This seems to demonstrate that such abilities TRULY are a divine gift that can be refused. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
243 views0 answers0 votes
Concetta’s brother, Harold, died a horrific death from AIDS. Concetta wrote, “I had been talking to the dead almost all my life, but before, they were just spirits that I didn’t know, and to be honest, at times I found them to be nuisances! I didn’t always want to hear these voices, but now there was one voice in particular that I was desperate to hear, and it didn’t come.” He later told her, “Con, tell them. Tell the world what you hear. We need you to, and they need you on that side too.” Why was there a delay? Was her brother hinting at the reality of being in limbo, something Concetta fails to clearly outline in her book? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
237 views0 answers0 votes
Concetta was asked by someone, “How can I know if my (psychic) abilities are ordinary or extraordinary?” She answered, “I think it would be self-evident, a matter of clarity of detail instead of just impressions of things. If you do hear voices, or rather fully articulated thoughts that don’t seem to be your own, that would be a big clue. Or if you see visions or ghosts. Everyone can, but for most, it’s not a common occurrence.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
238 views0 answers0 votes
Concetta wrote, “God is all and when we cross, we go from being a piece of God to being one with God, so it’s more joining with God than meeting God. God is pure loving energy.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
225 views0 answers0 votes
Concetta wrote, “I was doing a reading for this woman once and I said, ‘Your husband is there with so-and-so and they are playing checkers.’ She said, ‘No, they always played backgammon together.’ Okay, I’m not perfect—I always say this—but the point is that the game they enjoyed on this side, they were playing on that side. I’ve had spirits tell me they are still enjoying their weekly card games, whatever!” Is this really true? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
The goal in highlighting and discussing Concetta Bertoldi’s book is to suggest to our listeners, yet another “tool” they can use to help inculcate belief in both life after death, and the reality of Creator and the divine realm. The goal, of course, is to help the listeners ultimately understand, and awaken in them, a sense of purpose and even mission, to add their intentions to the effort of saving humanity from annihilation. Can Creator share how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are ready for them to utilize, to further enhance their belief and ability to make a material difference in their own lives and in the future of humanity itself?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
233 views0 answers0 votes
In a previous radio show exploring sudden psychic abilities, Creator said that only one in 50,000 people had profound psychic abilities, and were universally on mission lives to be endowed with this capability. Why so very, very few? Is this small number about the size the Extraterrestrial Alliance will tolerate? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
259 views0 answers0 votes
Is another reason there are so few, because of the divine injunction against forcing non believers to change their belief by providing overwhelming evidence, as opposed to a free will exploring of ideas, rather than imposition of belief? One of the reasons skeptics seem to have an easy time dismissing such extraordinary abilities is their incredible rarity in the population. What can Creator share with us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
226 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona has spent much of his career exploring paranormal phenomena shunned by the vast majority of his colleagues. He is the author of numerous books on paranormal topics and has conducted a number of high-profile experiments with astonishing results. It’s almost a miracle in its own right that he has avoided scandal and has managed to retain his employment as a tenured faculty member. Were his career and the careers of his close compatriots protected and facilitated by the divine realm? Why are there so few like Gary Schwartz as such open-minded academic scholars appear to be even rarer than the mediums he’s studied? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
217 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Schwartz and colleagues conducted a number of experiments with high profile mediums in the late nineties that resulted in both a book, The Afterlife Experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death, and an HBO special entitled “Life Afterlife.” The experiments were conducted in such a way, that no truly objective mind could dismiss the findings as essentially proving beyond a reasonable doubt, that these mediums were legitimately able to see, hear and communicate readily with the dead. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
The HBO special “Life Afterlife” was another story, however. Dr. Schwartz wrote: “HBO had made a beautiful, inspiring show. But the science was sandwiched in the middle and lost nearly all its impact. We had expected that the show would leave the audience feeling ‘Science can be brought to bear on these issues,’ and ‘Wow, those mediums were tested by science and actually were found to be doing what they claimed.’ Instead, the show was good entertainment but little more. We had thought HBO really cared about the science, but discovered what the producers most wanted was to see how many people were crying when the lights went up. After all, HBO didn’t really care about making a scientific statement.” In fact, HBO had given almost as much air time to skeptics, as they did Dr. Schwartz’s experiments. The producers apparently believed they were being “professional and fair” giving equal time to skeptics and therefore creating a “balanced” presentation. But in this case, it seems a “balanced” presentation is simply sinister. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
239 views0 answers0 votes
During the experiments, at one point Dr. Schwartz’s own mother was trying to come through and was overpowering the other dead people who were scheduled to make an appearance. This seemed to convey how little actual “control” the medium had over the channels of communication. It seemed the dead were more successful at establishing and controlling the boundaries of communication than the medium himself. Is this one of the reasons why divine partnership is so critical when one works with non-local consciousness?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
233 views0 answers0 votes
Also, during the experiments, there were a few occasions where one medium or another simply could not communicate with the dead people associated with a particular sitter. They simply got “nothing” the way most people would. Yet, a different medium would have no trouble with that sitter at all. It was summed up as the particular medium simply “wasn’t right” for that particular sitter. Yet that medium would have profound success with other sitters. Can Creator explain why this “all or nothing” anomaly occurred?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
225 views0 answers0 votes
One thing notably absent from the experiments was the entire notion of reincarnation. Nor was there any distinction made, or awareness of different states or conditions the dead might be communicating from. We know that one of three who die end up in limbo. Yet all the dead communicating appeared to be doing so from the same “place.” What was the reality of the dead in that set of experiments? Were all in the light? If so, were rescues performed for some prior to the experiments, and if so, by whom? Did the experiment itself act as a kind of “rescue entreaty” that enabled the divine to step in and “set the table” ahead of time? Or, indeed, were some in the light and some in limbo, even though there was no indication of such status during the experiments? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
234 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123Next »
Ask Question