DWQA Questions › Tag: proof
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “Can resentment, hatred and anger towards the interlopers short-circuit our power to heal them sufficiently for a final disentanglement? Is it essential that we heal and forgive our resentful feelings towards the interlopers to accomplish our mission of solving the problem of evil through healing?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
244 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Do we need to attain close to or even exactly 100% self-love and complete self-respect, among the whole human family, before we can ascend? Is this attainment a key aim of the phase of healing humanity after successful interloper departure?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
272 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Of several meanings that may be associated with the term FAITH, does “a firm belief in something for which there is no proof” best reflect the agreement that exists between humanity and the divine realm, where humanity is asked to believe in the presence and power of the divine but the divine realm cannot provide proof?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is there a better or more accurate definition for FAITH?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
231 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “In our light being state would we need facts, details, and assurances such as those that appeal to and satisfy the mind, or would our FAITH be based on what we sense, feel, and intuit?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
194 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “When we strive to satisfy our minds with facts, details, and assurances are we diminishing or eroding FAITH and its power?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
192 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Does unintended erosion of FAITH hurt both the self and others, and if so, how?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
185 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Does the implied need for an unbreakable contract weaken the partnership with Creator and limit the benefits that can be provided on our behalf? In other words, the more we trust, the more we get, the more we question, the less we get.”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “If we need exact, precise, and complete details of what and how Creator will act upon our behalf, is that an expression of doubt? How does this influence what Creator is able to do?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
162 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Does this need for feedback actually provide a diminishing return on the fuel we invest in prayer?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
188 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “If the Lightworker Healing Protocol is the ultimate expression of FAITH, does it serve us best when we expand what we ask Creator to do within it, and trust that the precise mechanisms the divine employs are beyond our grasp and should be, knowing that if details need to satisfy our minds we are creating doubt and limiting the reach of the LHP?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
173 views0 answers0 votes
Can you comment for the purpose of rounding out our comprehensive description of how to tell divine channeled wisdom from that of an imposter, whether a channeler communicating with a source speaking in a foreign language or taking on a persona with accent, idiomatic speech, and even personality characteristics matching a formerly living human is reliable evidence of authenticity?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
339 views0 answers0 votes
My client, [name withheld], wants to do a higher self channeling this evening and sent me a list of proposed questions. These included some test questions about where he was and what he was thinking at specific times during his life, as well as wanting to know names and descriptions of all his spirit guides and guardians, and in addition is wanting to know about involvement of any relatives with extraterrestrials. All three of these are troublesome ethical areas for interacting with the divine realm as we have learned over the years. We wish to avoid being put in a position where we are seen as faulty or phony because we cannot provide expected information that seems straightforward to the client but might be denied by the divine realm, such as proving their omniscience. We don’t want to be ducking our duty and are not unwilling to take some risks in putting ourselves forward come what may. However, we don’t want to be abusing the privilege and unnecessarily risking criticism when clients wish to cross ethical boundaries we are aware of. How should we deal with this in terms of serving what is highest and best for all concerned?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
540 views0 answers0 votes
What is the answer to the argument posed by nonbelievers that if God exists, it’s either all-powerful but not all good, or on the other hand, good but not all powerful, which they claim destroys the Christian argument for God’s existence either way?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
749 views0 answers0 votes
Will asking for signs of the divine presence be unanswered if belief is not strong enough, but always answered when belief is sufficient? Could this be a good way, not of guaranteeing proof for the existence of the divine, but serving as a diagnostic indicator of the need for cultivating stronger faith?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
679 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123Next »