DWQA Questions › Tag: problem solving
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “How can hypnosis help (by having access to the subconscious and being able to program it) to perform a better and more effective healing of humanity?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
295 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Having in mind that I always ask for divine protection during a hypnosis regression session and ask for the highest outcome possible, what are the pros and cons of doing healing of past, future and parallel lives, through regressions with hypnosis?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
318 views0 answers0 votes
Is having mastery over one’s mind, essentially the same as having mastery over one’s own emotions? And if not, what is the difference between the two forms of mastery?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
366 views0 answers0 votes
We’ve been told that the interlopers have severely compromised the connection between both our higher selves and the deep subconscious. Yet, it appears the connection is compromised but not severed. Is it even possible to sever the connection completely with the higher self and/or the deep subconscious?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
403 views0 answers0 votes
How can we, in our compromised state, actually sort out and identify in our mind, what thoughts and emotions originate with the higher self versus the deep subconscious?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
349 views0 answers0 votes
Do all communications from the higher self travel to our conscious executive self via the deep subconscious, or does the higher self have its own separate channel? If the communications travel via the deep subconscious, does the deep subconscious have a tendency to editorialize and even change the emotional content of the message, obscuring and confusing it perhaps?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
350 views0 answers0 votes
If the higher self has a separate channel, does the self have to deal with conflicting messages from the deep subconscious on the one hand, and the higher self on the other? Is this dichotomy the true origin of the meme where an angel whispers in one ear, and a demon in the other?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
331 views0 answers0 votes
When Creator speaks of standing strong against the onslaught of interloper mind control, are we really talking about standing strong against our own deep subconscious, and its unfortunate tendency to listen to the entreaties of the interlopers with naive trust and gullibility?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
359 views0 answers0 votes
When a being succeeds in standing strong, are they in effect training the deep subconscious to ignore the mind-control communications in the same way that a well trained guard dog will ignore a raw steak tossed at it by a would-be trespasser?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
338 views0 answers0 votes
People talk all the time about their emotions, their feelings and beliefs, and think what they feel is THEM, defines them, and constitutes what and who they are, completely. So, if anyone questions or criticizes their feelings or beliefs, it is interpreted as questioning their value and importance as a person, as a being, as a soul. Can Creator comment on this widespread perspective, how much truth is in it, and how much is confusion or illusion?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
354 views0 answers0 votes
People talk about “their” truth. Is there such a thing? Or is there really only one truth, along with people’s unwillingness to question and examine critically their own world views and assumptions compared to objective reality, in order to reconcile the sometimes blatant differences between the two?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
353 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Rational Thought is the one aspect of consciousness widely held to separate predominantly intelligent species from predominantly instinctual ones. Is it safe to say that rational thought is actually a creative thought process engaged in novel problem solving (novel for the being doing the problem solving) versus conditioned response (via instinct or behavioral modification perhaps)? The former is viewed as a predominately conscious, self-aware activity, while the latter is viewed as a predominantly unconscious activity lacking or at least not requiring self-awareness. How would Creator characterize this distinction in consciousness? What are we missing?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
313 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Observing humanity, a large spectrum is on display. From people who seem to operate mostly from conditioned responses, to those who truly seem to actively analyze everything around them consciously, enabling them to respond in novel unconventional ways that can be unpredictable and surprisingly effective (at least from the perspective of others). Emerson said, “foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.” Those who operate largely out of conditioning will struggle to find novel solutions to unanticipated and vexing problems, and rather, will keep applying the same conditioned response over and over again in spite of its continued failure or poor performance. With this postulate, how does Creator explain the difference in these two approaches to problem solving?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
317 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Rational thought appears to have a lot of enemies or potential obstacles or impairments to overcome. Karmic energy is clearly one of them. (As recognized in Creator’s recent revelation that “karma” was the cause of my complacency and feelings of futility when failing to act on my raccoon problem in a timely and rational fashion.) Fear of failure, and harsh judgment, and penalties is clearly another obstacle (which can all be heightened by karma created from past failures – including past life failures). Strong negative belief is yet another potential barrier (which also can be reinforced by karma). Then there are the physical, energetic barriers: fatigue, poor cognitive memory, lack of spatial discernment, dyslexia, etc. Rational thought has a LOT to overcome. Can Creator comment on why the deck is so stacked?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
312 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “While consciousness in the light has fewer barriers to rational thought, there must be some, otherwise, how could there ever have been fallen angels? Even though emotion is likely more balanced in the light because there are no “secrets,” and therefore fewer opportunities for misunderstandings, nevertheless, if a being decides that it does not “care” what fellow beings think and feel—all the while knowing of their consternation and disapproval, is that the beginning of their fall? Becoming a disease of the conscience? Where one continues to provoke suffering in others while having full knowledge and discernment of the suffering being caused, yet not caring? Did fallen angels discover through trial and error early on that being troublemakers was FUN. Can Creator comment on this problematic linkage between depravity, bullying and fun? Is the feeling of fun or deep satisfying pleasure partially a byproduct of life energy absorption stolen from the victims? And is an addiction to this rush of pleasure the principal fuel of the fall from the divine realm?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
381 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous12345Next »