DWQA Questions › Tag: perpetratorFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesWikipedia defines the Dunning-Kruger effect as follows: “The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a certain type of a task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge.” This effect seems common, and when encountered, almost completely resistant to challenge or debate. What is Creator’s perspective on the Dunning-Kruger effect? How much can be attributed to subconscious programming, and how much to the simple immaturity of the incarnated human?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votesA person with Dunning-Kruger might say something like, “… of course, I don’t know. I don’t NEED to know. I have COMMON SENSE.” And then expects their opinion to carry equal (or even greater) weight in a given debate. Can Creator share just how a person comes to think this way?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption211 views0 answers0 votesAnother behavior related to Dunning-Kruger would be a tendency to appeal to some kind of superior credential, even and especially if it is completely unrelated to the given debate at hand. Such a credential would be physical age: “Well young man, I am twenty years your senior, I think I know a thing or two.” Or, “You’re talking to a decorated veteran, show some respect!” Or, “I’ve lived a good life, had a lucrative career, raised three upstanding children, and am a grandparent to boot! I think my opinion should matter!” This tendency to take shelter in some kind of superior, if wholly unrelated and even irrelevant credential, is widespread and sometimes very problematic. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votesCreator described the ego in a previous GetWisdom LIVE program as follows: “The ego is a limited vessel, a limited capability that puts the self, first. As such, it is kind of like having a suit of armor that is self-protective. It might be awkward to wear, inconvenient, even drag you down from the sheer weight and inconvenience of suiting up before you make an excursion where you are at risk, but a potential lifesaver if you are attacked and would otherwise be vulnerable and perish. The suit of armor gives you a fighting chance at least. The ego, in the same way, is more like a weapon in being quite focused on your supremacy. In a sense, it is your last refuge to maintain an advantage and hold your ground to stand up to those who would bully you or intimidate, and provide a wherewithal to weather the storm.” The Dunning-Kruger effect appears to be the ego fulfilling this very function in a crude, imprecise, but very forceful and compelling manner. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votesCreator has previously discussed five principal selves that make up the human being—the deep subconscious, subconscious, cellular consciousness, primary or conscious self, and the higher self. What about the ego? Can it be, should it be, characterized as a “sixth self?” And if not, why not?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption231 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that some skills, muscle memory, and other proclivities we call natural talent, can be recorded in the akashic records, and re-introduced into the cellular consciousness of a new body in a new incarnation. This is how natural talent can be carried over from lifetime to lifetime. What about the ego? Is it also recorded in the akashic records and re-introduced in some fashion to a new incarnation? Is it, like karma and physical talent, left behind when one becomes a light being but re acquired upon a new incarnation (so the incarnating soul can essentially pick up where they left off)? Is the ego truly left behind when the departing consciousness enters the light and is it one of the big reasons there is more wisdom and clarity as light beings? Or is the ego of a particular lifetime utterly lost upon transition, and new incarnations start off with an essentially blank ego?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption199 views0 answers0 votesCreator has said that the angels have egos. It would be assumed then that light beings also have egos of some sort. Is there a difference between the ego of a physical incarnation, and the ego of a light being?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption214 views0 answers0 votesThe ego does not appear to be brain-dependent, as lost soul spirits, when encountered by human victims and healers and psychics, seem to display lots of functioning ego characteristics. Can Creator comment on the ego’s reliance or lack of reliance on the physical brain?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votesAt what age does the ego really take hold in a new incarnation? What can parents and caregivers do to help foster the healthy development of their child’s ego?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption203 views0 answers0 votesOver-inflated egos and the Dunning-Kruger effect seem to represent pressing healing needs for much of humanity. Can Creator share how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the best tools for bringing about the highest and best form of healing?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption183 views0 answers0 votesLong wrote, “One of the outstanding parts of the secret was the knowledge that only the subconscious self had the ability to use telepathy, and as all prayer had to go to the superconscious (higher self) TELEPATHICALLY, the prayers had to be made into thought forms and given to the subconscious to transmit to the superconscious (higher self). The making of a [prayer for a miracle] was based in large part on this mechanism.” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Higher Self266 views0 answers0 votesLong wrote, “The subconscious self, and it alone, has the ability to manufacture from the foods we eat and the air we breathe our basic vital force or power. Once made, it stores it in the body for use, and shares it with the conscious mind self, who may be said to live as a guest in the bodily house, and who has little to do with the bodily processes. The superconscious self (higher self) must also be supplied with the vital force if we ask it to work with the dense materials of the lower plane of living and make miraculous changes in matter or simply make the ‘answer to prayers.'” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Higher Self229 views0 answers0 votesLong wrote, “… the conscious self is involved in the process of prayer, in that it makes the thought forms of the prayer and instructs the subconscious to send VITAL FORCE WITH THE TELEPATHIC PRAYER TO THE SUPERCONSCIOUS (HIGHER SELF).” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Higher Self194 views0 answers0 votesLong wrote, “If the low self does not desire to have a prayer answered, it will not do its part in the work and effort is useless.” Also, “If the low self fears the change of the new, it will block the path.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Higher Self221 views0 answers1 votesLong wrote, “The High Self is said to lack mana (or vital force or life force energy) because it has no physical body, and to depend on the low self for what it needs in its ordinary activities when away from the lower man. When we are asleep it is supposed to touch us and take a little mana (or life force energy), but for the heavy changes needed to work in the materials of the dense or physical world, much mana (vital force) is needed.” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Higher Self211 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola