DWQA Questions › Tag: parallel livesFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesWhen we asked about the impact in terms of karma from someone killing themselves as an infant to avoid the troubled childhood they went through originally, you answered: “It would be too late to have undone those things influencing the person from the future, because their impact would have played out already and that karma would have had the intervening time to cause changes in the individual.” But then you said, and seemingly contradictory, “There would be a missing segment of trauma events no longer able to carry forward through a looping of time to influence the person adversely, so this would represent a potential benefit.” Can you explain which is true, or the contradictory answer more fully?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics362 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Can we expand all our previous sessions on individuals or groups by including new members to them in a similar fashion as we do with each Lightworker Healing Protocol version by doing a session on all our previous clients?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol298 views0 answers0 votesI have as a request in the current Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Carry out these sessions in perpetuity throughout the current life as well as all past, present and future parallel lifetimes, their future extensions, and all future incarnations, commencing with their return to the womb.” Is the phrase, “all future incarnations,” actually redundant? I was thinking it might be needed in case a new incarnation was started by another projection of the soul.ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol282 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner wonders: Our current Lightworker Healing Protocol reads, “Source Creator, invite the higher self of my clients to assist Creator in doing a Quantum Healing to bring in new instructions for the cells of the body from a future time of youthful health and wellbeing, apply it to all parallel past, current, and future lives and their future extensions, keeping it going with momentum, as a new reservoir of healing instructions that is available on an ongoing basis and redelivered in any new window of opportunity.” Should a clear distinction be made between the terms current and present? As in “the current life” (i.e. the one we are experiencing here and now) and “parallel present lives (more than one ongoing incarnation of our soul extension at the present time perhaps?)?” If so, should the wording above be changed to “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol276 views0 answers0 votesPerhaps for the benefit of the understanding of our practitioners, would it be best to add, after the revision stated above, the phrase, “undertaken by portions of the soul?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol287 views0 answers0 votesSimilarly, in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, would it be advantageous to use the wording “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions” to all the steps for the Quantum Healing, sending love to unborn selves, requesting a Soul Reawakening, and sending Divine Ultimate Protection?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol278 views0 answers0 votesIn the Lightworker Healing Protocol, we currently ask for healing of all light beings with the following request: “Carry out retroactive healing sessions on their behalf with the Protocol prior to their departure and transition to the light, and include them in all future healing sessions described by this Protocol.” Will it be advantageous to expand the request for retroactive healing of all current light beings to say: “Carry out retroactive healing sessions on their behalf with the Protocol throughout all parallel past and future lives and their future extensions, commencing with return to the womb and continuing until their successful transition to the light, and include them in all future healing sessions described by this Protocol?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol324 views0 answers0 votesWe understand that all lifetimes, past, present, and future, are taking place in parallel. Do they have quite differing starting points in time relative to our perspectives of the current life? In other words, did many of our past lives start prior to the birth date of our current life, while future lives start some time beyond where we are in our current life? Are there no such consistencies, or does it perhaps not matter because there can be crosstalk with the current life regardless of starting and stopping points?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics392 views0 answers0 votesIs it useful to consider the starting points of future extensions of the past, current, and future lifetimes relative to the current life being experienced, when we think about the karmic interplay through crosstalk?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics345 views0 answers0 votesYou commented previously that a problem healed effectively by a previous Lightworker Healing Protocol session could be reawakened by similar trauma occurring during an ongoing past life future extension, and through crosstalk with the present life, might undo the prior healing done. Will that type of problem now be prevented because of the latest Protocol provision to do repeat sessions in perpetuity? Will that catch new, emerging problems going forward?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics342 views0 answers0 votesI think I’m starting to understand the issues about going into the past and changing something and how it may not impact the future already created. Is it correct to say that if events have taken place involving me and then I go back in time and do something to cause the death of my younger self, perhaps at a very young age so that nothing in that timeline would seem to have happened from my perspective in pondering the consequences, that would clearly not be the reality? What you’ve been teaching is that by virtue of the fact I reached that child self’s future and then was able to come back, all of the consequences of my earlier days were, therefore, already created. So, in effect, if I were to go back in time and kill myself as an infant, for example, that would seem to leave a hole in that infant’s potential future. But, in actuality, there was a future already in existence from that infant growing up to become myself in that future time when I commenced to travel back and cause harm to my infant self. Am I on the right track here to understand why things will not unravel when changes to events in the past are done through time travel?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics338 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “So I take it, that I “can” go back and kill my grandfather and will continue to breathe and leave pollution, etc. But didn’t the act of killing my grandfather create a “new” timeline—one absent my now deceased grandfather? Or did it alter the “same” timeline and I effectively altered the future I came from?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics322 views0 answers0 votesNow that the future is “altered” after the disappearance of my grandfather, if I return to it, won’t I at least be a “stranger” there? With no history, no record of my existence, except the one I carry in my own personal memory? Or are there TWO futures I could travel to? One where I killed my grandfather, and one where I did not?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics429 views0 answers0 votesThe concept of future “probabilities” begs the questions can we “travel” to the different probable futures? Is this so?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics424 views0 answers0 votesIs it possible to get “lost in time” during time travel, or are compatriots in the “base time” you left, able to track you and “keep you tethered,” so to speak, regardless of how things are altered or manipulated, unless you managed to get yourself killed, which I assume would require a time “rescue” where a compatriot must travel back to an even earlier time to “save” you?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics319 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola