DWQA Questions › Tag: optimism
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
“Shame on you!” We’ve all heard it, and we’ve all said it. The Oxford Dictionary defines shame as both a feeling and an action, “a painful feeling of humiliation or distress caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behavior,” as well as, to “make (someone) feel ashamed.” Shame is a feeling nearly everyone everywhere tries to avoid, with the irony being that those most vulnerable to criticism are the ones most prone to overindulge in attempting to elicit that feeling in others. In some ways the dichotomy of shame is perhaps the most profound of hypocrisy litmus tests there is. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
93 views0 answers0 votes
Pavlov’s dog. If that term is unfamiliar to you, it is worth your time to get familiar with what it really means. Ivan Pavlov demonstrated a “conditioned response” in the dogs he used for experimentation. Some of these experiments were quite cruel and involved electric shocks to impair or elicit both involuntary physiological as well as behavioral responses. The act of shaming is actually a very similar paradigm, and it’s easy to imagine the one doing the shaming as having an electric shock button that they press to deliver a very uncomfortable at best, and excruciatingly painful at worst, emotional shock to the recipient’s consciousness. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
66 views0 answers0 votes
Shaming is not isolated to humans. An acquaintance has a five-year-old beagle who has an undesirable habit of urinating on the hardwood floor if not put outside on a timely basis. The dog has been trained entirely through rewards and only verbal shaming as punishment. But the effect of shaming can be quite profound. The dog knows that urinating inside the house is undesirable behavior and displeasing to the humans in the house, so the dog makes sure no one is watching when she goes. As an adult dog, she has never been caught in the act. One recent morning this acquaintance found the all too familiar puddle on the floor and turned to the dog right behind them, pointed to the puddle, and said, “No,” just, “No.” Not loud or even conveying much in the way of emotion, just enough to communicate displeasure. The response of the dog was rather extreme—tail between her legs and she wandered off to hide under the raised footrest of a recliner for a few minutes “until the coast was clear.” The acquaintance was a bit “taken aback” at the profound effect of a simple, “No.” This person does not shame the dog very often, and that may be one explanation for the exaggerated effect. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
107 views0 answers0 votes
The feeling of shame is associated with the “conscience” of a person. In fact, the very existence of this phenomenon is one of the most persuasive arguments there is for the existence of the divine. It’s hard to take the “conscience” for granted. Unfortunately, we have learned that the feeling of shame is a rather crude form of messaging that can be delivered from multiple sources, some benevolent and some malevolent. Presumably, it can come from the higher self, guides and guardians, and even Creator. It can also be triggered by the deep subconscious, cellular memory, spirit attachments, and perhaps most alarmingly of all, the interlopers—fallen angelics and extraterrestrials. Figuring out both the origin and relevancy of feelings of shame is one of the most profound challenges every human being faces. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
Shaming seems to be the very root of much political discourse, with one side attempting to shame the other side. The negative effect of all this is that people eventually get cynical about all political discourse and will shy away from it altogether. It’s even more discouraging when the ones doing the most shaming are also the most hypocritical, and the most guilty of the behavior they are shaming the other side for. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
Defiance is the act of resisting shaming. The middle finger salute came about as it was common practice in the Middle Ages to cut off the middle finger of captured soldiers, as this finger was necessary for effective archery. Soldiers would come to taunt their enemies by showing them from across the battlefield that they still had their middle fingers. Today this gesture is widely used to communicate, “I reject your efforts to shame me.” As humans are prone to go too far in utilizing compensatory behaviors like this, we often end up rejecting more criticism and shaming in ways that are unwise. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
It’s bad enough when the genesis of shame is others, but it can be even more insidious when the source of shame is the self. This can result in severe depression, withdrawal, and even suicide. It can even be embraced to the extent that the person fights off those attempting to counteract and heal their shame. The term “hugging your cactus” seems quite on target. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
89 views0 answers0 votes
The Battle of the Sexes can be sometimes downright comical and often involves nearly futile attempts to shame the other gender that simply don’t work. We see this when women frequently criticize men for “not asking for directions” and men almost universally just “laugh it off.” Most men are quite literally shameless when it comes to this behavior. Likewise, many, if not most women, cannot be effectively shamed for taking too long in the bathroom, and ignore such shaming attempts as, “Oh, just so much noise,” often increasing the frustration levels of the partner. More than one divorce ultimately results from these disparities. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
Shaming can be seen as an assault on another person’s belief system. The one doing the shaming is trying to demonstrate that the belief being challenged is false or deficient in some way. This can be where there is power in numbers, and the more people that can be enlisted in joining the one attempting to shame, the more profound the shame actually experienced by the recipient can be. It’s not an exaggeration that profound public shaming and embarrassment can lead to both suicide and homicide. And while psychopaths are said to lack a conscience, shaming one publicly might be the last thing you ever do. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
The topic of shame is a broad one, involving both feeling and action. In almost every instance there is a need for healing being demonstrated. Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the perfect tools for addressing shame, avoiding shame, and developing the wisdom to use shame sparingly and with the greatest effectiveness for the most desirable outcomes for all affected beings?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
57 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator bookend this discussion for us, by commenting on two terms that are diametrically opposed extremes—the paranoid and the pollyanna? Merriam Webster defines paranoid as “having extreme or unreasonable fear or suspicion.” It defines pollyanna as “a person characterized by irrepressible optimism and a tendency to find good in everything.” Another way to characterize the two extremes is the paranoid feels unsafe when there is no evidence of threat, while the pollyanna feels safe when there is stark evidence of danger all around. Our society today lauds the pollyanna and disparages the paranoid. A wise person likely considers both to be naive. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
146 views0 answers0 votes
Creator has been warning us about the ET threat for more than seven years now via Karl’s channeling shared with the world via GetWisdom. We are now, according to Creator, on the doorstep of Disclosure, and the ETs making themselves known in dramatic fashion. This is not only “unexpected” by most people outside of the GetWisdom circle, but completely opposed to the beliefs of most alive today or who have lived for the last millennia or more. This makes the job of warning humanity about the threat so difficult as to be nearly impossible. Yet here we are, with the ultimate “unexpected” about to unfold. Given all that humanity has faced, is there any reason to think that we should have been better prepared for this? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
223 views0 answers0 votes
Creator has warned us that humanity faces tidal power outages imminently. Because the ETs have a vendetta against the United States for its role in the Allied Victory in World War II, the United States is the first target. The Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI.org) published an article on their website entitled, “Reality Check: The United States Has the Only Major Power Grid without a Plan.” It turns out, the United States doesn’t have one grid, it really has three, and they are almost completely isolated from each other. And even within these grids there is a distinct lack of coordination and planning. Is this absence of coordination largely a result of mind control manipulation? Are these tidal power outages designed to exploit this weakness?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
196 views0 answers0 votes
Humanity appears to suffer from an extreme case of “short-sightedness.” Obviously, this can be partially explained by our relatively short lifespans. But even within the life of a single person, it’s unusual to expect anything outside of a house to last for more than a decade. And many things don’t last even that long. This is like an “artificial hardship” that is imposed and self-imposed. Many refrigerators built in the 1950s still work like new today, while today’s high-end models need expensive servicing, often just months after purchase. It’s as if our lives are intentionally designed to break, and break often, and expensively. We know planned obsolescence is real, but this is getting extreme now. It appears we do it to ourselves. Is this appearance deceiving? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
152 views0 answers0 votes
Right alongside planned obsolescence is a puzzling aversion to implementing redundancy. Yet redundancy has been proven time and time again to be worth the expenditure. Most yachts have two engines just for this reason. Yet there is a visible move away from redundancy in all aspects of life. Single points of failure are becoming the norm, and are one of the ways planned obsolescence is designed in. Yet, it’s a kind of insanity to surround ourselves with things that fail, fail quickly, and fail totally, beyond repair. It’s one thing if it’s a phone charging code, and quite another when it’s critical life support appliances like a furnace. The vast majority do not have any backup heat source. A tidal power outage will expose this lack of foresight like nothing else. Yet, we’ve had warnings about this, such as the 2021 Texas Deep Freeze that took over 1000 lives. Yet, it seems almost no one has learned anything from it. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
132 views0 answers0 votes
123Next »