DWQA Questions › Tag: New Age Movement
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
The cousins of the Vulcans were the “Romulans” depicted as descending from the same ancestral species. Unlike the Vulcans, the Romulans EMBRACED their aggressive nature and allowed their lives to be ruled by passion. The result being that such passions led inevitably, to depravity and evil. We know the interlopers are both aggressive and atheist. Which depicts the interlopers better, the Vulcans or the Romulans? And if the answer is the Romulans, what does that say about the advocacy of controlling one’s passions as the Vulcans strive to do?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
299 views0 answers0 votes
We know that all humans are subject to interloper mind control manipulation. And that such manipulation takes advantage of anxiety and passion for much if not most of its emotive power. So it seems the Vulcan pursuit of emotional control was an attempt to gain mastery of the very features of the self that the interlopers take full advantage of in humans, essentially depriving the interlopers of this influence over the individual. How much does mastery of one’s emotional nature and passions, and the ability to successfully cope with and neutralize traumas, protect or even make one immune to mind control manipulation?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
326 views0 answers0 votes
The desire to be rid of all emotion can only have its genesis in deep trauma—trauma so deep and pronounced that even love is suspect and untrusted to the extent it is thought best to dispense with it altogether. Obviously, this is a trap, and while Vulcans are depicted as good and generous, we know lovelessness can only lead to depravity. So as appealing to logic as this logic may seem, the abandonment of love can only be regarded as the highest of follies and the gravest of errors. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
316 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “As a longtime Buddhist practitioner and now a mindfulness teacher myself, I continue to struggle with trying to make sense of some of the core teachings in Buddhism. One of the three “marks of existence” that all Buddhist practices are centered around understanding through increasingly direct and deep insight/realizations on the path to enlightenment is “no self” or “not self” (annata), which includes that there is no such thing as a permanent, unchanging entity or “soul.” It is said that in his quest for enlightenment, the Buddha looked deeply for the “housebuilder,” the one behind the whole thing, this experience of “I, me, myself,” the doer, and he couldn’t find one, and found instead that all phenomena, including the experience of a fixed entity called a self or soul, were simply the result of interdependent causes and conditions coming together temporarily, including even consciousness itself, which arises temporarily to meet with sensory experiences (which includes the 6th sense of mind) and that this consciousness we experience, too, dies with the body. Of course, there is something that experiences rebirth, as Buddhism was very, very clear on that … Since the goal, enlightenment, involves the ONLY permanent death … The cessation of rebirth. One of my primary teachers stated that what gets reborn is not a “soul,” but our “habits.” I am really hoping that Creator can shed some light on these things, since the teachings of the Buddha are what I resonate with the most, and yet I am also an LHP practitioner and do believe in the divine realm and love the idea of having/being an “immortal soul.” The LHP itself I do see as basically a lovingkindness/compassion/sympathetic joy/equanimity (Divine Abodes) practice, and therefore an extension of Buddhist practice. I accept that especially because the teachings of the Buddha were not written down until hundreds of years after his death that they could have become corrupted, and that given the depth of dark manipulation on Earth they most certainly were. However, this teaching, that there is no soul, that there is no self, is basically THE most important teaching in all of Buddhism. The Suttas (sacred ancient Buddhist texts) quote the Buddha as saying, “Nothing whatsoever is to be taken as I, mine, myself. Whoever has understood this has understood all the teachings.” How are we to make sense of this?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
472 views0 answers0 votes
The Pleiadians seemed to CONFIRM what Dana Ashlie’s film suggested, that the next four to five months, and especially election day itself, as well as the “scheduled” inauguration day at the end of January, will be HIGHLY volatile. To the point that if the inauguration occurs at all, it won’t be anything remotely approaching “normal.” Do the current energies project dire events or are the fears unwarranted?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
359 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A person we found on the Internet allegedly channels Jesus and a group who promulgate study of A Course in Miracles. Can you comment on the validity of these entities please?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
492 views0 answers0 votes
Has the work, A Course in Miracles, been edited, changed, and corrupted to alter the meaning of some of the teachings as was done to the Holy Bible?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
436 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I just watched the documentary called “Age of Deceit” and I am wondering if Karl can ask Source Creator if the New Age agenda is based on the Gnostic writings and is in fact the agenda of the Anti-Christ.” Is this correct?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
494 views0 answers0 votes
The viewer asks: “The documentary claims that in fact the Anunnaki are the fallen angels and are masquerading as aliens. A similar information was provided in the documentary called “Aquarius: Age of Evil.” Watching these movies, I concluded that they will be introduced on Earth as saviors of humanity by those who will win the election in November and that will in fact be the beginning of the end.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
419 views0 answers0 votes
The viewer asks: “In addition, it was mentioned that the idea of ascension is also based on Gnostic writings or rather said “Satan’s Writing” and it is not a new idea and it is deceiving people to think that they are divine and equal creators as Creator is. Please clarify.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
399 views0 answers0 votes
A group on the Internet has a bulletin saying: “According to Greater Community rules of conduct within the region of space in which our world exists, Intervention is not allowed unless it can be demonstrated that the native people welcome and approve of it…Preparation for our contact with the Greater Community begins with awareness, education, and Knowledge, our spiritual Mind…In facing the Greater Community, humanity must build unity, self-sufficiency and discretion. These are the three requirements that all free nations must establish to be free in the universe.” Who are the members of this organization? Who are the members of the “Greater Community?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
435 views0 answers0 votes
Is this a positive development or a build-up to, and support of, Disclosure that will mean the undoing of humanity?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
363 views0 answers0 votes
Why did the Pleiadians make this categorical channeled statement to Barbara Marciniak: “When you are dealing with the angels, you are dealing with the Anunnaki?” Might she have introduced some personal bias?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
534 views0 answers0 votes
The Pleiadians also said: “Heaven and Anu are synonymous.” Why this blanket condemnation in linking heaven with the leader of the alien Anunnaki race who are subjugating us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
470 views0 answers0 votes
The Pleiadians also said that Anu is from a Reptilian ancestor named Allalu, and noted the similarity to the name Allah, again, implying a sinister relationship to religion. Why?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
486 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…1819202122…26Next »