DWQA Questions › Tag: negative God beliefsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesMoai, meaning “statue” in Rapa Nui, the language of the native inhabitants, are monolithic humanoid figures on Easter Island, in Eastern Polynesia, 2,182 miles off the West Coast of Chile. Can Creator tell us approximately when these were built, what was their purpose, and who built them? Was Easter Island as isolated then as it is now? Was human slave labor involved? Was it overseen and managed by Extraterrestrials directly, and/or were ET/human hybrids (the Nephilim) involved? Was this simply a make-work project for the amusement of the Extraterrestrial Alliance?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers310 views0 answers0 votesThe Ancient Aliens TV show has detailed many megalithic ruins in promoting the thesis that extraterrestrials have visited Earth and left their mark. This would seem to be a very narrow focus, given the abundant evidence the ETs are still here, and perhaps have never left. If so, doesn’t the fact the extraterrestrials have never come forward to help us show they are not benevolent? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers298 views0 answers0 votesBuffalo Bill Cody wrote in his autobiography, “While we were in the sand hills, scouting the Niobrara country, the Pawnee Indians brought into camp some very large bones, one of which the surgeon of the expedition pronounced to be the thigh bone of a human being. The Indians said the bones were those of a race of people who long ago had lived in that country. They said these people were three times the size of a man of the present day, that they were so swift and strong that they could run by the side of a buffalo, and, taking the animal in one arm, could tear off a leg and eat it as they ran. These giants, said the Indians, denied the existence of a Great Spirit. When they heard the thunder or saw the lightning, they laughed and declared that they were greater than either.” Is this solid testimonial evidence, that the Anunnaki indeed are atheists, just as Creator has told us many, many times? Could these giants really run with the buffalo as depicted? What more can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers297 views0 answers0 votesIn Southern Illinois, across the Mississippi River from St. Louis, Missouri, are many enigmatic megalithic earthworks in Cahokia, Illinois. According to the website, cahokiamounds.org, Cahokia was once one of the greatest cities in the entire world, once boasting a population larger than the City of London in AD 1250. The site contains the enigmatic “Monks Mound” earthwork which is a mammoth earth platform ten stories high. If this was built with slave labor carrying baskets of material, it would have taken decades or even hundreds of years to complete. Most Americans have never heard of Cahokia, and even many, if not most people, living in Illinois have never heard of it, even though it is literally in their backyard, so to speak. These mounds often contain, or had nearby, burials of giant skeletons. Were these giants the sole inhabitants, or were they the rulers? Were these Nephilim (Anunnaki/human hybrids) who, while ostensibly higher on the importance totem pole, nevertheless were never allowed to fully join Anunnaki society, and so were relegated to live low-tech lives in the same geographical regions as humans, and having to live off the land and by their wits as humans did throughout history?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers296 views0 answers0 votesThe fact humanity has so much history utterly lost to most of us, suggests something sinister is responsible. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol will bring about the healing needed to resolve the “real problem” behind our lost and forgotten history, and perhaps eventually even restore knowledge of that history in great detail?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers403 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner writes: “I recently did an LHP session for Source Creator. I assume, and maybe naively so, that Source Creator does not need healing in the way that we humans do, however, when looking at the requests in the Protocol, I wondered about the energies involved that could be ‘banked’ for future use by the divine realm, when those energies are not required in the healing for the LHP client and can thus be re-directed for use elsewhere. I suspect, for example, that there may be a lot of negativity directed at ‘God’ which can be transmuted to positive via the Protocol. Not only that, but is not Source Creator connected to every soul in all time domains and as such, would there be a ripple effect of healing for all via the various requests in the Protocol? I imagine the energies involved would be enormous. If this is the case, would including Source Creator as a primary client in every Protocol, hasten the healing of the free will galaxy?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol268 views0 answers0 votesThe assertions Creator is being asked to address in this episode come from the volume, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case Against Life After Death. The author, Matt McCormick, wrote, “The physical structures of the brain are causally responsible for consciousness and its capacities. A neuroscientist examining scans of a stroke victim’s brain can now predict, sometimes with remarkable accuracy (down to the millimeter), exactly what sorts of cognitive, conceptual, emotional, or psychological problems that the patient will experience as a result of his or her brain damage. The connection is too great, too pervasive, too immediate, and too strong to be ignored. The physical foundations of mental functions shows that the alleged separation of mind from brain posited by the dualistic survival hypothesis … will not occur.” What can Creator tell us about this skeptic’s conclusion?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs244 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote this in his contribution to the collection titled Dead as a Doornail: “While most of us would acknowledge some connection between mental function and the brain, we may have failed to see just how deep the connection runs. Even the most abstract mental faculties—and the most specific features and contents of our private mental states—can be mapped directly onto brain functions. … People who suffer from Anton-Babinski syndrome are cortically blind, but they don’t believe they’re blind or consciously blind. They will adamantly insist they can see even in the face of clear evidence of their blindness, dismissing their inability to perform visual tasks by confabulating explanations for their poor performance. … The syndrome results from a specific sort of damage to the occipital lobe of the brain.” Is this wholly a result of brain damage, as the skeptics assert, or is this a clue about the underlying origins and actions of consciousness? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs247 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Capgras syndrome results from lesions in the occipital, temporal, and frontal lobes of the brain. Afflicted patients have the powerful sense that someone they know, particularly a loved one, has been replaced by an imposter. Vilayanur Ramachandran postulates that the problem arises from a failure of the temporal regions responsible for face recognition to communicate with the limbic system regions responsible for emotional responses.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs258 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Cotard’s syndrome, or the delusional belief that you are dead, that you don’t exist, or that you have lost your organs or blood, results from damage to the channels of interaction between the fusiform face area and the limbic system.” What can Creator tell us about this? Are the researchers over-attributing causality to the brain damage alone? Would the same symptoms and delusions inevitably result in any person that suffered similar brain damage?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs219 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Research shows remarkable relationships between brain tumors and brain chemistry, on the one hand, and bizarre thoughts or behaviors, on the other. In one patient the onset of hypersexuality, obsession with pornography, and pedophilia paralleled the growth of a tumor in his right orbitofrontal lobe. When the tumor was removed, his urges lapsed. When the tumor grew back, his pedophilia returned.” What can Creator tell us about this tumor-to-behavior relationship?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs252 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Patients with no history of gambling find themselves overwhelmed with the urge to gamble when their dosages (of Parkinson’s drug pramipexole) cross a particular threshold, sometimes leading them to gamble away their life savings. But when the dosage is reduced, the urge vanishes.” Can Creator tell us what is REALLY going on here?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs235 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Even something as common as the effects of a cup of espresso show that those elements of consciousness alleged to survive biological death depend directly upon the brain.” This seems like missing the forest for the trees. Stimulus effects are conditions that arouse the “decision-maker” within, but they do not decide for her or him! Otherwise, it would be impossible to resist ANYTHING. And life calls for a great deal of discerning resistance! Is it safe to say that DECISION is a spiritual function, not a biological function? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs227 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Even rats are responsive to the pain of others, refusing to eat when their eating inflicts electric shocks on other rats.” He used this to argue that even morality is a product of evolution. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs263 views0 answers0 votesAtheist evolutionists have a tendency to showcase theory as fact. Matt McCormick wrote, “(Experts)… have now converged on the view that evolution favored hyperactive agency detection devices (HADD). The basic idea is there is survival benefit to detecting or attributing agency or intentionality to many things in our environment. ‘It is better to mistake a boulder for a bear, than a bear for a boulder.’ Mistaking too many things as conscious agents is a helpful error since detecting too few of them can be deadly.” McCormick speculates that this is why we are so quick to believe in brainless consciousness. We can’t help it. McCormick writes, “The prevailing view is that seeing manifestations of God’s conscious will, desires, and goals in the world is a byproduct of HADD.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs247 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola