DWQA Questions › Tag: mortality rate
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Dr. Al Sears cited what he calls “a landmark study conducted by scientists at the Cleveland Clinic.” The researchers discovered that recipients of more than one dose of a Covid vaccine are more likely to contract the virus. According to the study, the more vaccine doses received, the greater the risk: 1.5 times higher for those with two doses; 1.95 times higher for those with three doses; and 2.5 times higher for those with more than three doses. Despite these findings, the CDC continues to recommend Covid vaccines for virtually everyone age 6 months and older. The Cleveland researchers concluded that while the vaccines offer some short-term protection, they also likely increase the risk of future infection. The problem appears to be that taking multiple vaccine doses leads to “antibody-dependent enhancement.” In other words, the immune system’s response becomes skewed towards older virus strains, making it less effective against newer strains. In past channelings, you have defended the Covid-19 vax as necessary to prevent deaths overall during the pandemic, despite the risk of side effects. How would you answer these new criticisms of those advising against further vaccination? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
Human papillomavirus vaccination has been linked to occurrence of an autoimmune brain disorder, anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis, and that form of encephalitis has been observed to occur shortly after Covid-19 vaccination as well. Are these outbreaks of unusual autoimmune symptoms actually being produced by a contaminating virus inserted into vaccines surreptitiously?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
96 views0 answers0 votes
A recent study released as a preprint by S. Zhang and W. El-Deiry showed that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein inhibits tumor suppressor gene p53. The media is promoting the speculation this may explain a rise in cancer starting a year after the beginning of the pandemic, when vaccines based on mRNA spike protein production in the body became available. Is this a significant downside of the vaccines?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines did not impact overall mortality, a reanalysis of clinical trial data found. The two vaccines, both based on messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, protected against deaths from COVID-19 but that effect was offset by vaccinated trial participants being more likely to die from cardiovascular problems, Christine Stabell Benn, a health professor at the University of Southern Denmark, and other researchers reported in April in the journal, Cell. On the other hand, vaccines that utilized adenoviruses, such as the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, had a favorable impact on both COVID-19 mortality and overall mortality, according to the reanalysis. The research analyzed data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reported by the companies that manufacture the vaccines. “In the RCTs with the longest possible blinded follow-up, mRNA vaccines had no effect on overall mortality despite protecting against some COVID-19 deaths. On the other hand, the adenovirus-vector vaccines were associated with lower overall mortality,” researchers said. Is this re-analysis accurate and trustworthy? What is the conclusion we should draw from this work?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
336 views0 answers0 votes
Studies are showing more and more evidence of increased anxiety, depression, and suicide of children due to the Covid-19 lockdowns and having only remote learning, with social deprivation. Is there more to the story? Were they being mind-controlled to undermine them psychologically?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
215 views0 answers0 votes
It was just on the news that critics are calling out the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for withholding much data from the public about the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes data showing that natural immunity is protective, there is a low benefit for young adults 18-49 from the booster shot, the true low risk of COVID in children, occurrence of breakthrough infection in vaccinated people, and hospitalization data broken down by vaccination status that would show the percentage of vaccinated people not protected from infection. All are findings that question the need and wisdom of a vaccine mandate for everyone. The CDC offered the excuse that the public is simply unable to understand the data. Is that the whole story?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
296 views0 answers0 votes
A new report from Johns Hopkins University researchers reviewing hundreds of publications, concluded that lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe, including school closings, workplace closings, and shelter-in-place strategies, had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19. The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by only about 0.2%. They concluded, “We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality.” On the other hand, there were global negative impacts: “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.” This seems to be a human vindication of Creator’s perspectives about the intent of the pandemic and its course. Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
240 views0 answers0 votes
Lianhua Qingwen Capsules (LQC), which are also used against seasonal influenza, have been part of China’s standard of care against COVID-19 since February 2020, and countries like Thailand and Laos have also embraced the product. LQC, composed of 13 herbs, is said to have “a curative effect in patients with mild symptoms and helps to relieve fever, cough and fatigue,” and may also “help prevent the disease from worsening.” Research shows patients who received LQC along with “usual treatment” had improved recovery rates compared to controls (91.5% versus 82.4%). They also recovered faster (seven versus 10 days). Are these data accurate and of practical significance for COVID-19 disease management?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
347 views0 answers0 votes
Jinhua Qinggan—this remedy for mild and moderate COVID-19 symptoms consisting of 12 herbs, including licorice, mint, and honeysuckle, helps remove heat and detoxify the lungs. According to the State Council:4“A comparative experiment showed patients who took Jinhua Qinggan granule tested negative for coronavirus 2.5 days earlier than a group that did not take it. The group treated with the granule also took eight days to show improvement, while the other group took 10.3 days.” Are these data accurate and of practical significance for COVID-19 disease management?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
306 views0 answers0 votes
Are there more promising Traditional Chinese medicine approaches under study that will be forthcoming to help better control the pandemic?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
341 views0 answers0 votes
Studies by South African scientists of the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine against COVID-19 showed minimal efficacy in preventing mild and moderate cases of the new variant, which added to the mounting evidence that the B.1.351 variant makes current vaccines less effective. Is that truly the case, or are the milder cases actually patients who would have had very severe illness without having taken the vaccine, because the new mutant is being artificially introduced at much higher concentrations and is not really more infectious or lethal?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
386 views0 answers0 votes