DWQA Questions › Tag: moral dilemma
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
This former intelligence officer warned that the typical person has no idea just how much and on what scale advanced motivation and manipulation techniques are being deployed against them. It’s not a conspiracy theory. Creator has affirmed this as well on multiple occasions. When confronted with this reality, two questions come to mind. Can I avoid it? And if I can’t avoid it, can I successfully resist it? Is there even an answer outside of divine partnership? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
122 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer shared that he was taught about the difference between perception and perspective. Perception is what you sense with your five senses (and maybe your sixth). But its range is narrow and its reliability poor. It operates on instinct and emotion, so you twitch when someone you don’t expect touches you, or you see a dark shadow and jump thinking it’s a rat when it’s really dirty laundry on the floor. Perspective is your knowing that you’ve never encountered a rat in your room and that the odds of it being a rat are tiny. He claims he was taught to favor perspective over perception. We know that past life trauma resonates and could be why you reacted as you did, and that in a past life that dark shape on the floor WAS a rat. But even if that is true, it is not true in the current place and timeframe. “Don’t trust your gut” was his message and to always question, if not doubt outright, your first emotional reaction to anything. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer shared that it is accepted as an operating fact that 90% of people are trapped in their own perception. In other words, 90% of people think and respond emotionally, not rationally. In fact, those 90% do not even know there is a difference. This is the fundamental difference between trained and untrained people according to this former intelligence officer. And that it’s the most important skill an intelligence officer needs to learn and master, to think from perspective. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
103 views0 answers0 votes
The former intelligence officer said the human condition is extremely predictable. People want to feel heard, they want to feel listened to, and they want to feel validated. He says feeding these desires can be automated, and the result will be people willingly selling out themselves, often without any awareness that they are doing so. Everything we’ve learned so far about influencing people seems to be fundamental tradecraft in how to motivate (by positive reinforcement) or manipulate (by negative reinforcement). For someone who wants to safeguard themselves from falling victim to this kind of influence, how helpful is it to learn and understand how one’s own emotions and human needs can be leveraged against them? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
98 views0 answers0 votes
When someone confronts the fact that there is manipulation all around, is there any way to protect themselves from it? Are people trapped in their perception and their emotions more vulnerable to manipulation than people who exercise more perspective? Or are both hopelessly vulnerable and there is no genuine protection outside of divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
From an atheistic perspective, the situation seems pretty hopeless. But there is another perspective to consider—the DIVINE perspective, that protection from being manipulated can come from the divine realm in response to prayer work. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support can provide protection from manipulation that may not be possible through any other means known to humanity?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
129 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us not to encourage use of code words to launch an LHP session. Yet, rare individuals may be preconfigured in the light to enable this. Is it acceptable to tell practitioners it is okay to set up a code word to launch both the LHP and DSMR, knowing that only in rare instances will the LHP get done? Where is the harm, assuming they are not wasting significant time and energy to try augmenting their spiritual reach?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
89 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner writes: “One of the downsides of the code word approach according to Creator was that it freezes in place the current level of competence through belief quotient and level of intention summoned during that pilot session, because that becomes the energy on record to be repurposed each and every time going forward. To counter this limitation, I devised a workaround by adding to our boilerplate the following request: ‘Link all my iterations of this prayer in all time domains to my code-word I designate as ________, so that each time I say this code-word, the entire prayer requests are made including their indefinite repetitions.'” Will it work for him as he describes, because he was pre-configured in the light to have such wherewithal?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
He writes: “So every live session we do will automatically charge our code word LHP boilerplate with fresh intentions to ensure our code word LHP will be up to date with our live sessions going onward as the practitioner grows and evolves with his/her depth of understanding, knowledge, and heartfelt intentions. From the get go our small group members were able to launch code word LHP sessions. At that time they had less experience than they have now. Furthermore, all their live sessions automatically charge their pilot sessions with fresh intentions.” Is he correct? Have the practitioners following his method been successful linking the intentions from all their sessions to code words?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
92 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have used a past life regression therapist to help the consciousness of past lives ascend further into the light by evolving their perspectives, with what appear to be positive results, at least as reported by the therapist. Given the impracticality of verifying the results of such interventions for oneself, is this therapy a helpful complementary approach to LHP sessions? Is it just an opportunity that arose as a result of my own LHP-DSMR sessions and my own inclinations to explore these methods?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
105 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Given Creator’s warnings about possible corruption of psychics and possible interference by spirit meddlers, can this therapist, and other similar therapists, be regarded as reliable?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Doing LHP and DSMR sessions can be boring. I’m concerned this lowers my effectiveness. You have mentioned that chanting can be one way of ramping up intention that will keep a person focused and at a high level of energetic intensity. To what extent would it increase effectiveness of LHP/DSMR sessions to incorporate at the beginning of an LHP or DSMR session this or other methods of boosting energetic intention or belief quotient such as meditation, mantras, visualizations, etc? Is boredom a significant factor in reducing effectiveness of healing sessions, and are there useful better ways of countering boredom and loss of focus?”
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
227 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Is there perhaps a tension between initiating LHP healing sessions that allow the divine realm to heal things so that life can become more fulfilling with reduced karmic hindrances and obstacles, versus taking action despite karmic burdens to improve one’s life? What is the wisest balance?”
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
111 views0 answers0 votes
Please clarify the channeled answer you gave us about the overall healing achieved by the group of channelers attempting to emulate their leader who has an uncommon ability to launch LHP sessions with a code word. We asked, “How effective, on average, are members of this group in getting healing equivalent to live sessions?” And you told us: “We would say that the effectiveness, on average, is about 50% of what would be achieved were all those sessions done live…” Did this really mean to indicate that their code word sessions are still half as effective as live sessions, so that given they can launch hundreds of code words they accomplish far more than doing live sessions only? Or was the answer meant to convey that their total effort, the total healing output for the time expended, even though they might launch hundreds of code word sessions, ended up getting only 50% of what they could have accomplished just doing what live sessions they could for the same amount of time spent?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Would it be prudent for there to be a version of the LHP that only a few select people among the practitioner community are privy to, based on leadership role and dedication to the cause? I am asking this for two reasons: 1) security and 2) the recent blackout forecasting experience has demonstrated that some practitioners are of questionable faith and understanding, and might not be steadfast to the project long-term. Would keeping more exotic maneuverers away from all eyes be prudent and more effective for the greater good? Could this “limited” version be merged with the rest of the practitioner prayer pool by divine realm, so that other practitioners fuel the exotic maneuvers but without directly knowing about them? I’m thinking it would be sort of like when we harness all future protocol updates in the present, and send current updates into the past. Or does every part of the LHP have to be requested by all practitioners with full understanding of all tactics, in order for all requests to be effective and the protocol itself to work properly?”
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
119 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…7Next »