DWQA Questions › Tag: misdirectionFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesHow effective is the “Infrared Red Light Therapy Belt – VINATO 660nm Red Light 850nm Near Infrared Light,” in helping something like back pain, compared to other pads delivering infrared energy alone? Does the red light therapy and infrared both work, perhaps via different mechanisms, and is one superior to the other in level of relief, duration of relief, or effectiveness for a wider range of bodily issues?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Healing Modalities170 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks about the online video showing photos alleged to have been taken by Robert Scott’s Antarctic expedition in 1912. Among them are ruins of man-made structures. Are these genuine photos of prehistoric dwellings, but from some other source and time?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda163 views0 answers0 votesAre these Antarctic ruins antediluvian?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda196 views0 answers0 votesWhat was the climate like when these ruins were last occupied and utilized?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda205 views0 answers0 votesWhat was the purpose for the pyramids we see in the photos?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda225 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “Barbara Marciniak, whom Creator said is speaking the truth, said very clearly that the covid shot is a bioweapon and the people who take it will get very sick and may die. I don’t know why we don’t believe her, given the mountain of evidence we have from science. She even said whoever gets 3 covid vaccines, they might as well write their own will.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19277 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner brought a group to our attention offering grants for proof of afterlife communication with the allocation of a grand total of up to $1 million in grants. Is this a corrupted organization or a safe and helpful approach to getting broader recognition and support for our mission?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls285 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “During the show titled, Creator’s Perspective on Being Normal, on 9/16, about 57 minutes in, Creator said “…without sufficient healing, ascension will not happen, and if this is not done quickly enough, the interlopers will return and resume their oversight, manipulation, and control of humanity. The ultimate question is whether you will be annihilated in a few years OR WITHIN A FEW GENERATIONS. If you forestall the first hazard, there will be time to prevent the second.” At 58:38 Brian states, “Creator (is) warning us that even if we avoid the first hazard, we have to work hard to avoid a follow up hazard. In a few generations, we could be annihilated again if we don’t do enough healing work once they are gone.” This was a complete shock to me, the first I’ve heard this spoken in all the GetWisdom literature and webinars, videos, etc. Could this issue PLEASE be addressed? It feels like the goalpost has shifted considerably with this news.” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda281 views0 answers0 votesWikipedia defines the Dunning-Kruger effect as follows: “The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a certain type of a task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge.” This effect seems common, and when encountered, almost completely resistant to challenge or debate. What is Creator’s perspective on the Dunning-Kruger effect? How much can be attributed to subconscious programming, and how much to the simple immaturity of the incarnated human?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption184 views0 answers0 votesA person with Dunning-Kruger might say something like, “… of course, I don’t know. I don’t NEED to know. I have COMMON SENSE.” And then expects their opinion to carry equal (or even greater) weight in a given debate. Can Creator share just how a person comes to think this way?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption187 views0 answers0 votesAnother behavior related to Dunning-Kruger would be a tendency to appeal to some kind of superior credential, even and especially if it is completely unrelated to the given debate at hand. Such a credential would be physical age: “Well young man, I am twenty years your senior, I think I know a thing or two.” Or, “You’re talking to a decorated veteran, show some respect!” Or, “I’ve lived a good life, had a lucrative career, raised three upstanding children, and am a grandparent to boot! I think my opinion should matter!” This tendency to take shelter in some kind of superior, if wholly unrelated and even irrelevant credential, is widespread and sometimes very problematic. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption186 views0 answers0 votesCreator described the ego in a previous GetWisdom LIVE program as follows: “The ego is a limited vessel, a limited capability that puts the self, first. As such, it is kind of like having a suit of armor that is self-protective. It might be awkward to wear, inconvenient, even drag you down from the sheer weight and inconvenience of suiting up before you make an excursion where you are at risk, but a potential lifesaver if you are attacked and would otherwise be vulnerable and perish. The suit of armor gives you a fighting chance at least. The ego, in the same way, is more like a weapon in being quite focused on your supremacy. In a sense, it is your last refuge to maintain an advantage and hold your ground to stand up to those who would bully you or intimidate, and provide a wherewithal to weather the storm.” The Dunning-Kruger effect appears to be the ego fulfilling this very function in a crude, imprecise, but very forceful and compelling manner. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption182 views0 answers0 votesCreator has previously discussed five principal selves that make up the human being—the deep subconscious, subconscious, cellular consciousness, primary or conscious self, and the higher self. What about the ego? Can it be, should it be, characterized as a “sixth self?” And if not, why not?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption214 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that some skills, muscle memory, and other proclivities we call natural talent, can be recorded in the akashic records, and re-introduced into the cellular consciousness of a new body in a new incarnation. This is how natural talent can be carried over from lifetime to lifetime. What about the ego? Is it also recorded in the akashic records and re-introduced in some fashion to a new incarnation? Is it, like karma and physical talent, left behind when one becomes a light being but re acquired upon a new incarnation (so the incarnating soul can essentially pick up where they left off)? Is the ego truly left behind when the departing consciousness enters the light and is it one of the big reasons there is more wisdom and clarity as light beings? Or is the ego of a particular lifetime utterly lost upon transition, and new incarnations start off with an essentially blank ego?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption182 views0 answers0 votesCreator has said that the angels have egos. It would be assumed then that light beings also have egos of some sort. Is there a difference between the ego of a physical incarnation, and the ego of a light being?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola