DWQA Questions › Tag: mind control manipulation
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “It seems as though there is an effort to always create a pretext for any aggressive action the Extraterrestrial Alliance wishes to see carried out. Essentially, blame the victim. Irresponsible home buyers were blamed for overextending themselves, and deserved to be ruined as a result, just as foolish and short-sighted students borrowing tens of thousands to get unmarketable degrees deserve their comeuppance and lifelong debt burden they cannot pay back. Can Creator comment on this ET strategy and why we humans so easily fall for it?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
389 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is there any danger of President Trump gaining the upper hand and using the sham impeachment as a pretext for a Republican martial law dictatorship? Are the ETs playing a game here and allowing some freedom for the outcome to go either way, as the MAP won’t care who’s President in the end? Or is this evidence of their losing control a result of divine intervention?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
410 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “How can prayer and the divine realm keep this political crisis from developing fully? Is an ongoing stalemate between partisan factions our best hope for avoiding the worst outcome?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
359 views0 answers0 votes
Can you give me your guidance on the light languages that people are channeling?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
442 views0 answers0 votes
Is Dr. Helen Fisher correct that antidepressants like Prozac, Paxil, and Zoloft, not only lower sex drive, but actually inhibit both the ability to fall in love and to stay in love? Is this being ignored because it is misperceived as being, at worst, a minor side effect of little practical impact, or is there a more sinister manipulation to support the widespread and increasing use of these substances?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
317 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “We know mind control works. We know this is happening on a large and ubiquitous scale. The question is WHY does this work SO WELL? Why is logic so ineffective against artificially introduced, but clearly well-entrenched, belief?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
325 views0 answers0 votes
The Camp fire that devastated Paradise, California, reportedly cost the lives of only 86 people despite its population of over 26,000. The population has reportedly dropped by over 90%. Were the majority of people able to relocate safely, or is the reported death toll an understatement?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
379 views0 answers0 votes
Is the YouTube video purported to be a Department of Defense presentation of a proposal to “vaccinate” people in the Middle East with a flu virus attacking the VMAT2 gene, a genuine presentation that took place and not a doctored video to produce disinformation?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
363 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Rational Thought is the one aspect of consciousness widely held to separate predominantly intelligent species from predominantly instinctual ones. Is it safe to say that rational thought is actually a creative thought process engaged in novel problem solving (novel for the being doing the problem solving) versus conditioned response (via instinct or behavioral modification perhaps)? The former is viewed as a predominately conscious, self-aware activity, while the latter is viewed as a predominantly unconscious activity lacking or at least not requiring self-awareness. How would Creator characterize this distinction in consciousness? What are we missing?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
345 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Observing humanity, a large spectrum is on display. From people who seem to operate mostly from conditioned responses, to those who truly seem to actively analyze everything around them consciously, enabling them to respond in novel unconventional ways that can be unpredictable and surprisingly effective (at least from the perspective of others). Emerson said, “foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.” Those who operate largely out of conditioning will struggle to find novel solutions to unanticipated and vexing problems, and rather, will keep applying the same conditioned response over and over again in spite of its continued failure or poor performance. With this postulate, how does Creator explain the difference in these two approaches to problem solving?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
352 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Rational thought appears to have a lot of enemies or potential obstacles or impairments to overcome. Karmic energy is clearly one of them. (As recognized in Creator’s recent revelation that “karma” was the cause of my complacency and feelings of futility when failing to act on my raccoon problem in a timely and rational fashion.) Fear of failure, and harsh judgment, and penalties is clearly another obstacle (which can all be heightened by karma created from past failures – including past life failures). Strong negative belief is yet another potential barrier (which also can be reinforced by karma). Then there are the physical, energetic barriers: fatigue, poor cognitive memory, lack of spatial discernment, dyslexia, etc. Rational thought has a LOT to overcome. Can Creator comment on why the deck is so stacked?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
342 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “While consciousness in the light has fewer barriers to rational thought, there must be some, otherwise, how could there ever have been fallen angels? Even though emotion is likely more balanced in the light because there are no “secrets,” and therefore fewer opportunities for misunderstandings, nevertheless, if a being decides that it does not “care” what fellow beings think and feel—all the while knowing of their consternation and disapproval, is that the beginning of their fall? Becoming a disease of the conscience? Where one continues to provoke suffering in others while having full knowledge and discernment of the suffering being caused, yet not caring? Did fallen angels discover through trial and error early on that being troublemakers was FUN. Can Creator comment on this problematic linkage between depravity, bullying and fun? Is the feeling of fun or deep satisfying pleasure partially a byproduct of life energy absorption stolen from the victims? And is an addiction to this rush of pleasure the principal fuel of the fall from the divine realm?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
411 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Another barrier to rational thought I would characterize as “entitlement belief” regardless of its genesis, and “expectation and anticipation equity.” Having just done a sports show, this is conveniently illustrated by the fan experience. Fans are not direct stakeholders in a sports franchise. They don’t own the team, the intellectual property, trademarks, the stadium, or anything of a tangible nature. They even have to PAY to consume the product, buy tickets, pay for parking, or suffer through commercials on television when watching a sports event. Yet, fans everywhere feel ENTITLED. They feel the team “owes” them something in exchange for the INVESTMENT the fan has made with them. And the more time the fan has spent being a fan for a particular team, the MORE they feel they are owed.”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
331 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “How much is the physical brain needed for true rational thought. We know that while being stuck in limbo the capacity to think rationally is GREATLY impaired. How much does the amount of life force energy available contribute to or impede rational thinking?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
360 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is wisdom rational thinking, unencumbered and unimpeded?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
386 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…131132133134135…158Next »
Ask Question