DWQA Questions › Tag: mind compartmentalization
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
If a belief is validated by direct experience, it seems such a belief would be difficult to alter. But is this in fact true? Can such beliefs be readily altered by mind control manipulation? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
70 views0 answers0 votes
It is a commonly held notion that faulty beliefs can be altered by direct experience that violates the belief in question. But it is also readily observed that many humans find having their beliefs challenged to be extraordinarily stressful and distasteful, and even rage-provoking in some instances. Why is the mind so seemingly protective of challenges to beliefs regardless of their objective or demonstrable rightness or wrongness?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
66 views0 answers0 votes
Is having a notion of reality something that only truly self-aware beings possess? Does the deep subconscious have any kind of abstract notion of reality or is it simply operating in a behavioral instinctual capacity and it simply doesn’t occur to the deep subconscious to question reality because it lacks the mental cognitive faculties to do so?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
73 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that we are cut off from our deep subconscious, and that is the origin of many of our diverse emotional and behavioral issues. Yet the deep subconscious can communicate with us emotionally through the corpus of the body in the form of stress and anxiety. Does this happen in a reactionary manner and without thought? Does it respond to any direct stimulus experienced by the physical body? How aware is the deep subconscious of what is happening to the incarnated consciousness that it is tasked with protecting?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
76 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that the deep subconscious is constantly engaged in a kind of rote sentry role where it is constantly surveying the akashic records and making comparisons to unfolding events in a person’s life, and then hitting the proverbial “panic button” when it detects the likelihood of past trouble resurfacing. We assume it is responding to the intensity of the “energetic signatures” recorded in the akashic records, and that the approach to healing the deep subconscious is to change these signatures so they do not become triggers. Can the deep subconscious learn not to “fret” so much?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
80 views0 answers0 votes
Do the aliens have any ability technologically to alter the energetic signatures in the akashic records? Is this another way they can mess with us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
97 views0 answers0 votes
As the Law of Karma has a kind of built-in mechanism for altering energetic signatures in the akashic records when it determines that a karmic debt has been paid, the akashic records are like a “karmic bank,” so to speak, where our indebtedness is recorded and the ledgers balanced by the actions of karma directly in response to our actions and reactions. Does karma have any notion of wisdom gained, or does it concern itself solely with energy flow and balance?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
77 views0 answers0 votes
We know from many past teachings that the best way to resolve emotional and belief issues with and by the deep subconscious is through healing. Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best means for resolving any and all issues affecting the deep subconscious and, by extension, ourselves?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
Is my client’s mother [name withheld] depressed because of a chronic virus infection?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
100 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Is the agent Lithium Orotate a safe and effective treatment for various mental health issues such as depression and anxiety? Can this agent make an individual more vulnerable to energetic manipulations, entrainment, or complacency?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
73 views0 answers0 votes
A former intelligence agent started a business coaching people in spy techniques and insights that he believed could be applied to everyday life to help people be more effective in accomplishing whatever it is they set out to do. Like most things in life, these techniques and understandings can be used for good or evil. A match can light a birthday candle or start a forest fire. To the extent that others might use these teachings for harm, how much karmic liability attaches to the teacher? Is this a reason why dangerous knowledge was historically reserved for initiates? And even that would seem to have karmic polarity in that it safeguards the innocent and immature on the one hand, but can also be a means to hoard and deny access to resources that one can argue should be more widely shared. What is Creator’s perspective on the “safe handling” and/or dissemination and sharing of material that is potentially helpful but equally dangerous?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
183 views0 answers0 votes
Intelligence agencies are in the business of gathering intelligence—information that is difficult to attain through ordinary means; information that people are hesitant and resistant to give up or share. The successful intelligence agent will employ the tools of motivation and manipulation to get this information. These tools are matched to particular means with which to motivate and/or manipulate people to get them to do what you want them to do. These approaches are referred to with the acronym “R.I.C.E.” Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. Of these four, appealing to ideology is seen as the most effective, and coercion the least. If you successfully appeal to ideology, the “target” will trust you and share almost anything. Coercion is the weakest as, contrary to Hollywood, it may work the first time you use it, but then you destroy trust and will have fewer opportunities for future success with the target. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
115 views0 answers0 votes
While being trained as an intelligence officer, this individual learned he was an ideal candidate because he was special (clearly an appeal to ego), or at least that is what he thought. But, in fact, he learned he was special because he had been algorithmically identified as psychologically damaged and traumatized in particular ways that were useful for intelligence gathering. These are people one would rarely label “well adjusted” by society’s standards. The agency was ruthlessly honest in telling him they intended to leverage that dysfunction, give him a vocabulary for understanding the nuances of human motivation and manipulation, and techniques for achieving goals and agendas with targets. In this undertaking, the overall wellbeing of the target is not a top consideration and moral flexibility was a prized capacity for successful agents. What is Creator’s perspective on the moral flexibility so highly prized by intelligence agencies?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
114 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer shared that if you need a target’s cooperation, and there is no means by which to positively and transparently motivate them, then that gives you the green light to manipulate them. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
117 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer warned that the typical person has no idea just how much and on what scale advanced motivation and manipulation techniques are being deployed against them. It’s not a conspiracy theory. Creator has affirmed this as well on multiple occasions. When confronted with this reality, two questions come to mind. Can I avoid it? And if I can’t avoid it, can I successfully resist it? Is there even an answer outside of divine partnership? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…45678…40Next »
Ask Question