DWQA Questions › Tag: mind compartmentalization
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Erickson treated a couple of patients with an affective (wholly psychological) writing disorder. Neither could write but could do any number of other complex hand tasks like using tools or knitting. He was unable to treat one of the patients, but with the other, he used hypnosis to “transfer” the handicap to the other non writing hand. This finally enabled this patient to resume writing successfully, but with the effect that the other hand would go numb, every time they went to write something. So while this is difficult to label a “healing,” it is a creative workaround to the problem and was a great help to the patient. What was really happening here, why was Erickson successful with one, but not the other patient, and what is truly needed to heal such disorders?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
205 views0 answers0 votes
Erickson mentioned a little-known phenomenon to folks who don’t work in extremely loud industrial settings. For old-timers in these settings, it is not uncommon for two acclimated workers to be able to carry on a “normal” conversation, at normal volume levels, when outsiders can’t hear each other even when shouting in close proximity. How is this even possible? This appears to be a phenomenon almost akin to telepathy. It certainly seems to defy our understanding of hearing biology. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
242 views0 answers0 votes
One reason that science appears to eschew hypnosis is because the phenomenon is not 100% reproducible on demand. There is no such thing as a hypnotic induction technique that will work with every subject, every time. Erickson found that even with well-experienced subjects, he would sometimes have to alter his induction approach because they had developed what he called a ‘mind-set’ or intimate awareness of it, such that it was no longer effective. This was especially a problem with highly intelligent subjects. Ordinary science appears to have no patience for any of this. It appears to be more “art” than “science.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
214 views0 answers0 votes
Erickson never believed that some people cannot be hypnotized, and spent his life attempting to prove that. One student, in particular, required over 300 one-hour working sessions before he could develop a somnambulistic trance. Once that was achieved, he turned out to be an outstanding subject. Erickson also noted that most engineers are difficult to hypnotize. Something peculiar about engineers seems to make them exceedingly impatient with anyone even attempting to hypnotize them. The result was that during many of his studies, it was always the engineers that would quit on him, often en masse. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
263 views0 answers0 votes
Karl began his healing career as a hypnotist. And it was certainly the mixed results he got with it that helped motivate him to explore subconscious healing beyond hypnosis—eventually resulting in the revelations of Empowered Prayer and The Lightworker Healing Protocol. Can Creator share with us the importance of that journey and its achievements?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
250 views0 answers0 votes
Is the fact that human emotional problems like depression and anxiety can seemingly reside in one brain hemisphere, but not the other, an example of a corresponding compartmentalization of cellular memory that actually houses the underlying trauma memories and distorted beliefs they caused?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
174 views0 answers0 votes
To what extent do post-hypnotic suggestions get stored in cellular memory as opposed to short-term or long-term memory?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
209 views0 answers0 votes
To what extent are post-hypnotic suggestions embraced by the deep subconscious, to be acted on?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
213 views0 answers0 votes
Is the relative weakness of post-hypnotic suggestions also due to the fact that they do not necessarily become beliefs, or actually conflict with previously held beliefs and get discarded?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
153 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “I was impulsed to reach out to you and ask you what you feel about providing some type of direction for those that are starting to ramp up their dreaming without proper direction. People can “steer” their presence in the dreamscape, and this is never talked about at GetWisdom. Not really. Not the type of detail that could be not only instructional but incredibly beneficial. It occurred to me that if we’re going to go down that rabbit hole of asking the subconscious to work with dreams, the dreamer, in my opinion, should have some type of direction as to how to steer and navigate the dreams that are starting to manifest. Yes, that said, Creator knows best, and perhaps I’m reaching too far?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
168 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “My wish is that, at some point, people will be able to do their own Deep Subconscious Channeling with Holographic Memory Resolution (DSC-HMR), with intent, while dreaming. We have seen that this is doable, right?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
208 views0 answers0 votes
This line of questioning resulted from encountering the following statement when studying the collective papers of Dr. Milton H. Erickson. Erickson is a man many consider to be the Einstein of hypnosis and hypnotherapy. In the forward Dr. Lawrence Kubie wrote: “One of the strange things about the study of hypnotic phenomena is that so many investigators drop out along the way. Behavioral scientists may work in this field for varying periods only to turn away to other things. This phenomenon is one of the reasons why the field of hypnotism tends repeatedly to drift into the hands of enthusiastic but unscientific amateurs, or into hands of those who exploit it for entertainment.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
211 views0 answers0 votes
When Dr. Milton H. Erickson was an undergraduate student at the University of Wisconsin, he participated in a series of seminars exploring hypnotic phenomena. Erickson, even as a student, was in disagreement with his professor sponsoring the seminars. Erickson thought hypnotic phenomena had little dependence on the hypnotist, and crafted experiments to demonstrate this assumption. The experiments were wildly successful, beyond Erickson’s expectations. Erickson wrote: “The entire sequence of events was disturbing and obviously displeasing to my professor, since he felt that the importance of suggestions and suggestibility and the role of the operator (the hypnotist) in trance induction were being ignored and by-passed, with the result that this approach to a study of hypnosis was then abandoned in the university seminars.” Can Creator elaborate on why his professor was so “disturbed?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
177 views0 answers0 votes
Milton Erickson’s mentor eventually left the University of Wisconsin for Yale University. This is from Wikipedia: “After moving to Yale, his work in hypnosis quickly encountered resistance. The medical school’s concern over the dangers of hypnosis caused him to discontinue his research.” This seems like karmic payback, in at least some capacity, for the professor doing the same thing to his student, Erickson, years earlier. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
173 views0 answers0 votes
Why does the collective medical establishment consider hypnosis dangerous and taboo? Their aversion to it appears to go beyond a mere belief in its ineffectiveness. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
209 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…2324252627…40Next »
Ask Question