DWQA Questions › Tag: mind compartmentalizationFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesWikipedia defines the Dunning-Kruger effect as follows: “The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a certain type of a task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge.” This effect seems common, and when encountered, almost completely resistant to challenge or debate. What is Creator’s perspective on the Dunning-Kruger effect? How much can be attributed to subconscious programming, and how much to the simple immaturity of the incarnated human?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption188 views0 answers0 votesA person with Dunning-Kruger might say something like, “… of course, I don’t know. I don’t NEED to know. I have COMMON SENSE.” And then expects their opinion to carry equal (or even greater) weight in a given debate. Can Creator share just how a person comes to think this way?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption196 views0 answers0 votesAnother behavior related to Dunning-Kruger would be a tendency to appeal to some kind of superior credential, even and especially if it is completely unrelated to the given debate at hand. Such a credential would be physical age: “Well young man, I am twenty years your senior, I think I know a thing or two.” Or, “You’re talking to a decorated veteran, show some respect!” Or, “I’ve lived a good life, had a lucrative career, raised three upstanding children, and am a grandparent to boot! I think my opinion should matter!” This tendency to take shelter in some kind of superior, if wholly unrelated and even irrelevant credential, is widespread and sometimes very problematic. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption192 views0 answers0 votesCreator described the ego in a previous GetWisdom LIVE program as follows: “The ego is a limited vessel, a limited capability that puts the self, first. As such, it is kind of like having a suit of armor that is self-protective. It might be awkward to wear, inconvenient, even drag you down from the sheer weight and inconvenience of suiting up before you make an excursion where you are at risk, but a potential lifesaver if you are attacked and would otherwise be vulnerable and perish. The suit of armor gives you a fighting chance at least. The ego, in the same way, is more like a weapon in being quite focused on your supremacy. In a sense, it is your last refuge to maintain an advantage and hold your ground to stand up to those who would bully you or intimidate, and provide a wherewithal to weather the storm.” The Dunning-Kruger effect appears to be the ego fulfilling this very function in a crude, imprecise, but very forceful and compelling manner. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption189 views0 answers0 votesCreator has previously discussed five principal selves that make up the human being—the deep subconscious, subconscious, cellular consciousness, primary or conscious self, and the higher self. What about the ego? Can it be, should it be, characterized as a “sixth self?” And if not, why not?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption219 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that some skills, muscle memory, and other proclivities we call natural talent, can be recorded in the akashic records, and re-introduced into the cellular consciousness of a new body in a new incarnation. This is how natural talent can be carried over from lifetime to lifetime. What about the ego? Is it also recorded in the akashic records and re-introduced in some fashion to a new incarnation? Is it, like karma and physical talent, left behind when one becomes a light being but re acquired upon a new incarnation (so the incarnating soul can essentially pick up where they left off)? Is the ego truly left behind when the departing consciousness enters the light and is it one of the big reasons there is more wisdom and clarity as light beings? Or is the ego of a particular lifetime utterly lost upon transition, and new incarnations start off with an essentially blank ego?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption185 views0 answers0 votesCreator has said that the angels have egos. It would be assumed then that light beings also have egos of some sort. Is there a difference between the ego of a physical incarnation, and the ego of a light being?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption203 views0 answers0 votesThe ego does not appear to be brain-dependent, as lost soul spirits, when encountered by human victims and healers and psychics, seem to display lots of functioning ego characteristics. Can Creator comment on the ego’s reliance or lack of reliance on the physical brain?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption185 views0 answers0 votesAt what age does the ego really take hold in a new incarnation? What can parents and caregivers do to help foster the healthy development of their child’s ego?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption193 views0 answers0 votesOver-inflated egos and the Dunning-Kruger effect seem to represent pressing healing needs for much of humanity. Can Creator share how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the best tools for bringing about the highest and best form of healing?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption172 views0 answers0 votesCollin’s online Dictionary defines normal as: “Something that is usual and ordinary, and is what people expect.” Yourdictionary.com defines it as: “Conforming to an accepted, usual, or typical form, model, or pattern.” Most people at some point in their life strive to be normal, and of course, some strive not to be. Many who strive not to be, do so because they earlier failed in their attempts to be and appear normal. For some, being normal is relatively easy, for others it’s a struggle, and for a few, impossible. For some, appearing normal is a major accomplishment, and for others, a necessary nuisance. People are habitual creatures. Norms should reflect successful behavior patterns that stand the test of time. But when “accepted norms” change rapidly, that should be a clue that something is wrong. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs187 views0 answers0 votesA woman reports a conversation with her ex-husband, a successful public personality and a household name in his country. She was trying to convince him that the mainstream media often told lies and created fictional narratives designed to manipulate people into acting and believing things they would not do or believe ordinarily. His response was “if we can’t trust the mainstream media, who can we trust?” Being a highly successful and duly rewarded public figure, he had a lot to lose if he challenged the narrative. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs163 views0 answers0 votesOne aspect of being normal is believing in the common good, that the two are somehow synonymous in many if not most people’s minds. If one simply strives to be normal, one will automatically and simultaneously be considered to be a good person. And to challenge a person’s normality is to simultaneously challenge their goodness. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs166 views0 answers0 votesWhat does Creator think of the idea of root beliefs representing beliefs that create the very foundations of a person’s personal worldview? Such a root belief would be “normal is good.” And from this one belief, an entire superstructure of beliefs about proper behavior, proper ideas, proper appearance, and, most problematic of all, proper politics is manifested. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs181 views0 answers0 votesA root belief is a belief that will be protected at all costs. Even, and especially, in the face of conflicting evidence to the contrary. For instance, if one held the root belief that “democracy is good,” then anything that challenges their notion of democracy is bad. So if a democratically elected leader bends or breaks the rules, but does so to protect democracy, then the behavior is justified. Even if the actions taken are decisively non-democratic. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs136 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola