DWQA Questions › Tag: lockdowns
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Studies are showing more and more evidence of increased anxiety, depression, and suicide of children due to the Covid-19 lockdowns and having only remote learning, with social deprivation. Is there more to the story? Were they being mind-controlled to undermine them psychologically?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
A new report from Johns Hopkins University researchers reviewing hundreds of publications, concluded that lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe, including school closings, workplace closings, and shelter-in-place strategies, had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19. The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by only about 0.2%. They concluded, “We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality.” On the other hand, there were global negative impacts: “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.” This seems to be a human vindication of Creator’s perspectives about the intent of the pandemic and its course. Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
241 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the Mercenary Army Program busily spreading new “mutations” of the COVID-19 virus?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
837 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Where has the flu gone? Is this just a relabeling of the flu as COVID-19?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
443 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is this continued lockdown with masks, social distancing, etc., doing anything to reduce the spread of COVID-19?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
484 views0 answers0 votes
The newly available vaccines have been criticized for claiming >90% effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 as judged by people developing two or more symptoms as the criteria to get tested for confirmation of illness. So the critics say, this leaves the possibility that up to 20% of people might still get infected, but remain asymptomatic. But wouldn’t those people very likely have benefitted nonetheless? Isn’t preventing symptoms what is most needed? And wouldn’t a mild, asymptomatic infection serve to further bolster their immunity and be a gain rather than a loss?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
363 views0 answers0 votes
A mutant form of the COVID-19 virus first surfaced in September in Britain, but already accounts for more than 60 percent of new cases in London and neighboring areas. Is it true that this new SARS-CoV-2 mutant, called B.1.1.7, is more transmissible than previous forms of the COVID-19 virus, or is it just being spread artificially with greater intensity?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
341 views0 answers0 votes
Will the currently available vaccines for COVID-19 have similar efficacy in protecting against infection with this new SARS-CoV-2 mutant, called B.1.1.7?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
323 views0 answers0 votes
The World Health Organization and The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) planning for pandemics has previously reserved lockdowns of economic activity only for the most severe of pathogens. Category 1 represents an ordinary flu season with up to 90,000 deaths, and Category 2 causing 90,000-450,000 deaths, so COVID-19 would be classified as Category 2. The CDC said for Category 2 and 3 pandemics, governments should consider school closures of less than 4 weeks, along with moderate efforts to reduce adult social contacts, such as by encouraging telecommuting. Why have there been widespread and prolonged lockdowns of schools and businesses which have become indefinite in some states?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
354 views0 answers0 votes