DWQA Questions › Tag: light being capabilitiesFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesIt is assumed that the precise makeup of soul attributes possessed by any soul, and by extension any incarnated individual, are UNIQUE in that no one else in the history of creation has ever possessed, and no one else ever will again possess, the precise template of attributes possessed by any individual. Is that a true assumption?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential111 views0 answers0 votesWhen we say something is unique, that does not communicate anything about SIMILARITY. Can it be said that we are all different, but not that different, that humans are, in fact, more similar than dissimilar? For instance, we know that even identical twins are not truly identical, but they are quite similar. Can Creator comment on both the uniqueness and simultaneous similarity of humans?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential112 views0 answers0 votesThere is a saying, “When you label me, you negate me,” but it’s hard to grasp the notion of soul attributes without introducing the notion of categories. And categories by necessity utilize labels to denote elements or members. At some point, we do ourselves a disservice by insisting that no one should ever have expectations about another person. This gets to a point of absurdity when we refuse to acknowledge that a petite 100-pound female cannot play on the offensive line of an NFL team. What does Creator say about the tools and usage of categories and labels?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential126 views0 answers0 votesBoth the Lightworker Healing Protocol and the Deep Subconscious Memory Reset Protocol contain healing instructions for soul attribute expressions. This implies that there is nothing inherently wrong or flawed with any soul attribute, but rather with how they are EXPRESSED, which is a function of free will. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential109 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that Creator will not lead, and so with that understanding, it is wise to first survey existing literature and bodies of information for ideas of what soul attributes really may encompass. When one starts to research this topic of attributes, one unavoidably encounters the notion of archetypes. The Google dictionary has two relevant definitions for the word: 1. “A very typical example of a certain person or thing,” and 2. “A recurrent symbol or motif in literature, art, or mythology.” So archetypes denote “typical examples” and they are denoted and recognized by recurrent symbols or labels. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential76 views0 answers0 votesAfter surveying the literature of available information on this topic, including channeled material, some of which is certainly not entirely reliable, we end up with a short list or “best guess” of what seven basic archetypical types of human expressions or roles might be. There is the helper type, which expressed as an occupation would be a nurse. The next would be the artistic type. Typical occupations would involve any and all types of experiential manipulation from fashion designer to architect to interior decorator to musician. The next type would be the athletic type. These are your professional soldiers and professional athletes and even school teachers. They gravitate to competition of all kinds and small-group leadership roles. One body of literature denoted these three types as common. These three—helper, artistic, and athletic—are asserted to constitute nearly two-thirds of all humanity. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential105 views0 answers0 votesThe remaining roles would be researcher, typical occupations being anything scholarly. One source said something to the effect, that only the “researcher” type of person could spend an entire lifetime studying the mating habits of an African beetle. A helper type would never be able to do that without going crazy. The remaining three types are the orator type, with journalist being a principal occupation, the spiritual type, with anything involving religious and/or inspirational leadership and devout following being center stage, and finally the “chief” type. The “chiefs” are souls that are always focused on the BIG picture and gravitate to roles and occupations that impact large numbers of people. It is assumed that chiefs make up the smallest percentage, as low as 2% of all humanity. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential140 views0 answers0 votesSo if we were to assume that each human is typically and primarily one of those roles, that would narrow the expected behavior of such a person substantially. So while it would certainly not be impossible for a helper type to become President of the United States, you wouldn’t expect it. Nor would you expect an orator type to pursue mechanical engineering as an occupation. If they did, you would likely find them becoming the editor of an engineering periodical, rather than burying themselves all day in blueprints. So while these primary attributes don’t create HARD boundaries that prevent individuals from doing anything they want, they do, in fact, help mold and define those very WANTS to begin with. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential83 views0 answers0 votesThis is a mere introduction to the topic of soul attributes, and we will explore soul attribute expressions in a future episode. Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, and Deep Subconscious Memory Reset Protocol along with Divine Life Support are the means by which Soul Attribute problems and negative issues of all kinds are best resolved?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential84 views0 answers0 votesAre memories stored as proposed by Karl Pribram, in a distributed manner throughout the brain, analogous to the interference patterns in a hologram?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Non-Local Consciousness190 views0 answers0 votesRupert Sheldrake observes in criticizing the widely accepted but unproven hypothesis there are memory traces in the brain aiding memory retrieval, that the memory trace must have a memory itself to know what to look for. How does consciousness know where to look, to retrieve relevant memories?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Non-Local Consciousness176 views0 answers0 votesThere are numerous examples among animals and even lower life forms, that learning a task helps other members of the same species start learning that task more quickly. In humans, test scores like IQ measurements, have improved steadily over time without a convincing explanation and is called the Flynn effect, after its discoverer. The term morphic resonance has been used to describe these phenomena, but that still seems quite a vague description. How does human learning of specific information help others in the future somehow know and retain those facts more readily?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Non-Local Consciousness174 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Will there be a need for sleep after the ascension? Will we ever experience fatigue again?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Human Potential178 views0 answers0 votesFinding your soulmate, your better half, the partner of your dreams, has never been easy. But lately, it seems to have become exponentially harder than ever before. It is believed that fully half of single men have given up on dating and courting women altogether. There is even a mass movement of men known as MGTOW (mig-tao) or “Men Going Their Own Way.” Critics call this movement “male supremacy,” and hateful of women, but members would dispute that and counter that modern relationships with women are downright dangerous for men—dangerous enough to warrant complete withdrawal and avoidance of any and all non-professional involvement with women. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society172 views0 answers0 votesSomething as simple as holding a door open for a woman has suddenly become an uncertain endeavor that could just as easily elicit condemnation and accusations of bigotry and misogyny as it does a smile and warm “thank you.” As a result, many, if not by now most, men have given up on the practice altogether, leaving a great many more traditional women confused and even angry. So it’s become almost a catch-22 situation. Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society164 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola