DWQA Questions › Tag: light being capabilitiesFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesFrances Bacon said: “The covetous man cannot so properly be said to possess wealth, as that may be said to possess him.” Bacon is suggesting that covetousness is a form of obsession, and perhaps even a form of possession. Can Creator share with us how interlopers, spirit attachments, and even mind control manipulation can aggravate and take advantage of this proclivity, this vulnerability?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society71 views0 answers0 votesMartha Stout, PhD, wrote about the problem of “covetous sociopathy” in her book, The Sociopath Next Door. She writes, “The covetous sociopath thinks that life has cheated her somehow, has not given her nearly the same bounty as other people, and so she must even the existential score by robbing people, by secretly causing destruction in other lives. She believes she has been slighted by nature, circumstances, and destiny, and that diminishing other people is her only means of being powerful. Retribution, usually against people who have no idea that they have been targeted, is the most important activity in the covetous sociopath’s life, her highest priority.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society76 views0 answers0 votesMartha Stout wrote: “What sociopaths envy, and may seek to destroy as part of the game, is usually something in the character structure of a person with conscience, and strong characters are often specifically targeted by sociopaths. Sociopaths want to play their game with other people. This simple but crucial observation implies that, in sociopathy, there remains some innate identification with other human beings, a tie with the species itself. However, this thin inborn connection, is one-dimensional and sterile, especially when contrasted with the vast array of complex and highly charged emotional responses most people have to one another and to their fellow human beings as a group.” Covetousness seems to be a form of envy. Is envy really the last “connection” the sociopath has to other beings? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society64 views0 answers0 votesIf there is anything the extraterrestrials actually “envy” about us, what is it? Is it the joy and happiness we feel with each other on account of our loving nature that they do not possess nor understand? By sheer observation they can see how pleasurable and satisfying a healthy love relationship can be, and while they might tell themselves it’s all silly foolishness, deep down, do they “know” it’s not? Do they suspect they are “missing out” on something and does this fuel their hatred? Is their arrogance and self-aggrandizement really a cover for deep unrelenting pain they can never successfully suppress entirely? Really, WHY do they hate us so much? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society117 views0 answers0 votesWe are once again face to face with a divine-level problem—the problem of healing covetousness. But while the details of healing are carried out by the divine, nothing happens without our intention enabling that healing to be carried out. If divine healing were a pizza, it wouldn’t arrive at your door on its own. You have to order and pay for it. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the means, really the only means, by which the covetous heart can be healed in all beings, both physical and spiritual?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society79 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Amongst physically incarnated sentient species, are there more psychopaths in the galaxy than non-psychopaths?”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society74 views0 answers0 votesIt’s difficult to coherently discuss a problem when there is widespread confusion and no consensus on definitions. The words “psychopath” and “sociopath” are often used interchangeably, but some professionals and academics say there are important differences. One says, “Psychopathic behavior often results more from genetics or a congenital injury, whereas sociopathy is more from environmental factors.” Google’s AI overview lists these differences: Empathy and Remorse: Psychopaths have a complete lack of empathy and remorse, while sociopaths may show some degree of these emotions. Impulsivity: Psychopaths are more calculated and manipulative, while sociopaths are more impulsive and prone to erratic behavior. Causes: Psychopathy is thought to have a stronger genetic component, while sociopathy is more likely to be caused by environmental factors. A bestselling author would say both are essentially “without a conscience.” Can Creator comment on the usefulness or lack thereof of these definitions, and provide us with Creator’s definition of the problem, and best way to label and describe it?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society58 views0 answers0 votesBestselling Psychologist Martha Stout, Ph.D. wrote the bestseller, The Sociopath Next Door. She regards sociopaths as those “without a conscience” – which is how it is presumed Creator would define it. She would likely characterize psychopaths as simply more overtly violent sociopaths. She described sociopaths as possessing “a noncorrectable disfigurement of character that is now thought to be present in about 4 percent of the population – that is to say, one in twenty-five people.” She writes of sociopaths: “Sociopaths have a greater than normal need for stimulation, which results in their frequent social, physical, financial, or legal risks. And sociopaths are noted especially for their shallowness of emotion, the hollow and transient nature of any affectionate feelings they may claim to have, a certain breathtaking callousness. They have no trace of empathy and no genuine interest in bonding emotionally with a mate. Once the surface charm is scraped off, their marriages are loveless, one-sided, and almost always short term.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society49 views0 answers0 votesSociopaths make up only four percent of the human population, but according to Creator, they make up one hundred percent of all three physical extraterrestrial species interacting with Earth. Since we have little opportunity to study and observe alien behavior and civilizations, would becoming familiar with human sociopaths provide us with helpful and compelling insights into the nature and behaviors of these extraterrestrials?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society55 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, “Sociopaths have a greater than normal need for stimulation.” She also wrote: “In fact, terrorism (done from a distance) is the ideal occupation for a person who is possessed of blood lust and no conscience, because if you do it just right, you may be able to make a whole nation jump. And if that is not power, what is?” How about making an entire WORLD jump? Dr. Stout seems to have absolutely nailed the entire human dilemma with these observations. People wonder, how could “advanced beings” act this way? Well, they are “advanced sociopaths,” and this is how they are behaving. Apparently, with their “greater than normal” need for stimulation. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society54 views0 answers0 votesUnderstanding the “greater than normal need for stimulation” helps us make sense of the numerous stone images of the Anunnaki throughout the Middle East. Not only are they giants, averaging 12 to 15 feet tall, but all of them appeared exceptionally “athletic” and muscular. And possessing advanced medical capabilities that can replace even lost limbs and organs, this would give them license to engage in “extreme sports” including combat sports with each other. Is it safe to say the Anunnaki are “high-strung,” impatient with everything, and bore easily? This sounds like the LAST kind of being you would want “lording over you?” How much of their average day is spent working out? Are they all “obsessed bodybuilder gym rats?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society71 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, about sociopaths, “The intellectual difference between right and wrong does not bring on the emotional sirens and flashing blue lights, or the fear of God, that it does for the rest of us. Without the slightest blip of guilt or remorse, one in twenty-five people can do anything at all.” She further wrote, “The presence or absence of conscience is a deep human division, arguably more significant than intelligence, race, or even gender.” “But as to what is possibly the single most meaningful characteristic that divides human species (and humans from extraterrestrials) – the presence or absence of conscience – we (humans) remain effectively oblivious.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society46 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, “A good psychopath can play a concerto on anyone’s heart strings … Your best defense is to understand the nature of these human predators.” Does that naturally and rationally extend to the extraterrestrial predators as well, and that the number one way they “play on our heart strings” is through channeling directly to humans who share those words with the world? Is our best defense against Anunnaki psychics, our attempts to understand the nature of these extraterrestrial predators? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society51 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, “It is crucial to note that all of the psychiatric diagnoses (including narcissism) involve some amount of personal distress or misery for the individuals who suffer from them.” “Sociopathy stands alone as a ‘disease’ that causes no dis-ease for the person who has it, no subjective discomfort. Sociopaths are often quite satisfied with themselves and with their lives, and perhaps for this very reason there is no effective treatment.” She also wrote, “We (humans) feel that if someone is bad, he should be burdened with the knowledge that he is bad. It seems to us the ultimate injustice that a person could be evil, by our assessment, and still feel fine about himself.” And even though beings like the Anunnaki don’t feel guilt, do they still try to make each other aware of their awfulness? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society49 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, “Sociopaths are infamous for their refusal to acknowledge responsibility for the decisions they make, or for the outcomes of their decisions. In fact, a refusal to see the results of one’s bad behavior as having anything to do with oneself – ‘consistent irresponsibility’ in the language of the American Psychiatric Association – is a cornerstone of the antisocial personality diagnosis. People without conscience provide endless examples of such stunning ‘I’ve done nothing wrong’ statements. Instead, when confronted with a destructive outcome that is clearly their doing, they will say, plain and simple, ‘I never did that,’ and will to all appearances believe their own direct lie. This feature of sociopathy makes self-awareness impossible, and in the end, just as the sociopath has no genuine relationships with other people, he has only a very tenuous one with himself.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society52 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola