DWQA Questions › Tag: light being capabilitiesFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA practitioner asks: “Would it be helpful to net all pathogens with white light to reduce their ability to trigger the immune system to fight back, causing ‘the collateral damage of many, many chronic illnesses and their symptoms,’ as described in the Divine Wisdom Database entry? Should/could the effects of viruses on the immune system be attenuated in a similar fashion to how dark spirit meddlers are addressed in the LHP? On page 5, ‘Have All Spirits, Pathogens, and Intruders Netted with a white Light (for any new arrivals),’ and on page 10, ‘Net all spirits, pathogens, and other intrusive energies within and around my clients following this session and hold them safely in place until they are removed by repeated protocol work.'” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol104 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “This question is asked in reference to Karl’s previous channeling of Source Creator on 10-28-25. [A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective? “This can be requested to happen—the application of the benefits of antiviral supplements be transferred to everyone, everywhere, across all timelines—but this will not be uniformly effective because each individual situation, time, place, circumstance, and the people involved will have an energetic matrix that will govern the energetics of what is allowable with respect to divine intervention and all of the variables, such as levels of belief in the divine, belief in the self, and the inner barriers to change from corrupted beliefs about one’s physical makeup and circumstances. People believe in their illnesses and this is a barrier to divine healing. So this is a highly variable and uncertain undertaking but it can be requested for more to be done.” The above channeling, describing barriers to divine intervention for implementation of antiviral supplement benefits across timelines, seems unsurprising. The same restrictions apply quite variably, to potentially every request in both the LHP and DSMR protocols. Divine intervention is always uncertain as to the degree and effectiveness allowable, depending on individual circumstances and energies. Is there a workaround we are unaware of that would help this sharing of antiviral healing and protection be more uniformly potent? Knowing these barriers exist, can we simply request they be transmuted into welcoming and amplifying positive energies?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol92 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “In a recent channeling Creator has said that the divine can’t take viruses directly out of us because that would essentially amount to killing them, but that we can use physical measures such as antiviral supplements to get rid of viruses ourselves without accumulating karma from doing so. On the other hand, we have been told and know that Creator regularly removes viruses from food or beverages to be ingested if we use the daily prayers. I would like to understand why it seems to be possible for you to remove viruses from our food directly but not from our bodies? Isn’t it essentially the same as killing the viruses when removed from our food? What’s the difference? Is it because, in the case of food, the viruses haven’t come into contact with the consciousness of a host body yet and can therefore be removed more easily? Is it because they can be removed from food without killing them or something else entirely?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol153 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “It was a bit disappointing to find out that remote healing via the LHP seems to be rather limited when it comes to removing viruses directly. Creator has stated that more than 85% of all chronic illnesses are viral in origin, so that seems to be quite a limitation for what remote healing is able to achieve if one of the main culprits that is responsible for most illnesses seems to be off-limits, at least in a direct and immediate sense. The fact that we can take measures into our own hands and use antiviral supplements or other physical methods to free ourselves from these viruses is all well and good but there are still massive limits in place that will hinder our progress. What about our other lives, for example?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol178 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “So we may have been lucky enough to find out the truth about viruses and what to do against them in this life, thanks to Karl’s brilliant work, but what good is it if it comes to our many other lives where we don’t possess this knowledge, let alone the means to do anything about it? To me this seems like a rather big hole in the healing equation that needs to be addressed somehow. Is there any kind of “loophole” by which we could achieve more in this regard?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol121 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol140 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “How do we determine what kind of life is valuable?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Human Potential283 views0 answers0 votesA news report states: “Nearly a dozen violent assailants equipped with tactical gear and weapons attacked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Prairieland Detention Facility in Alvarado, Texas, on July 4, shooting a local law enforcement officer in the process.” Is this just a spontaneous choice of those assailants coming together because of shared political beliefs, or is there a deeper influence involved behind the growing attacks on this branch of law enforcement?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Problems in Society167 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “Brian has mentioned on the air that the Rosary Prayer has very limited power based on the wording not having specific requests, but there are those in the Catholic community (for example, Gabi after hours, “A Rosary Revolution” https://youtu.be/FE2vEodC1aU?si=HtYkSeL_7ZOkz6If ) who find that it is extremely powerful over obsessions and spiritual struggles such as pornography.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Prayer304 views0 answers0 votesHe writes: “Here’s a video [about the Rosary] that states there’s a hidden code based on primary numbers that can be observed somehow within it that I think you might benefit by looking at: The Rosary’s Impossible Prime Number Proof (Mathematical Apologetics).” What is Creator’s perspective and most important for us to know?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Prayer404 views0 answers0 votesThe recently deceased Stanford Emeritus Professor Dr. Philip Zimbardo wrote the book, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. Dr. Zimbardo is famous for his 1971 “Stanford Prison Experiment” that he was compelled to abruptly terminate as it quickly got out of hand and turned into a dangerously oppressive and health-threatening situation for the experiments’ participants after only a week. In the experiment, the prison guards became overwhelmingly sadistically abusive and cruel, and the prisoners became shockingly powerless and submissive to the point of losing their objectivity and grip on reality and actually believing they were real prisoners and not just participants in an “experiment.” The findings of this experiment were deeply disturbing and shocking on many levels. Zimbardo wrote, “One of the dominant conclusions of the Stanford Prison Experiment is that the pervasive yet subtle power of a host of situational variables can dominate an individual’s will to resist.” He continued, “We see how a range of research participants … have come to conform, comply, obey, and be readily seduced into doing things they could not imagine doing when outside those situational force fields.” Can Creator tell us how this MOCK prison with randomly chosen guards and prisoners almost immediately took on the atmosphere and oppressiveness of some of the world’s worst prisons and concentration camps? Zimbardo wrote, “We were surprised that situational pressures could overcome most of these healthy young men so quickly and so extremely.” Is this widespread and disturbing proclivity, to quickly slip into either extreme perpetrator or extreme victim roles, an inherent flaw in the human makeup? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Problems in Society406 views0 answers0 votesZimbardo wrote about the Rwandan genocide. The Holocaust Museum website gives this summary: “Under the cover of war, Hutu extremists launched their plans to destroy the entire Tutsi civilian population. Violence spread with lightning speed through the capital and into the rest of the country, and continued for roughly three months. Between 500,000 and one million people, mostly Tutsis, were slaughtered in 100 days. Hutu militias, backed, trained and equipped by Rwandan government forces, were responsible for the majority of the killing.” Zimbardo wrote: “A Hutu murderer said in an interview a decade later that ‘The worst thing about the massacre was killing my neighbor; we used to drink together, his cattle would graze my land. He was like a relative.'” Zimbardo wrote further, “The testimonies of these ordinary men – mostly farmers, active churchgoers and a former teacher – are chilling in their matter-of-fact, remorseless depiction of unimaginable cruelty. Their words force us to confront the unthinkable again and again: that human beings are capable of totally abandoning their humanity for a mindless ideology, to follow and then exceed the orders of charismatic authorities to destroy everyone they label as ‘The Enemy.'” Can Creator help us make sense of this sense-less event in recent human history?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Problems in Society360 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stanley Milgram contrived and carried out a famous experiment on Blind Obedience to Authority. Google’s AI provided this summary: “In the experiment, participants were instructed to administer increasingly severe electric shocks to a learner (an actor) for incorrect answers. The study demonstrated that ordinary individuals are surprisingly willing to obey authority, even when those orders conflict with their own moral beliefs.” Zimbardo wrote: “In Milgram’s experiment, two of every three (65 percent) of the volunteers went all the way up to the maximum shock level of 450 volts. … The data clearly revealed the extreme pliability of human nature. Milgram was able to demonstrate that compliance rates could soar to over 90 percent of people continuing the 450-volt with the introduction of one crucial variable … Make the subject a member of a ‘teaching team,’ in which the job of pulling the lever is given to another person.” We want to think of the majority of humanity as good, but Milgram demonstrated rather conclusively that 9 out of 10 people can become, willingly, a party to unthinkable cruelty. Even to an authority that has no means to actually compel them. Can Creator tell us, how can this possibly be?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Problems in Society251 views0 answers0 votesZimbardo characterized the Milgram Studies as “Creating Evil Traps for Good People.” Zimbardo extracted ten methods for this: 1. Create a contractual obligation. 2. Give a positive role or title like “teacher.” 3. Present basic rules that “must” be followed – even if vague. 4. Spin the agenda as “positive” – bad-tasting mouthwash “kills germs.” 5. Insist the authority is fully responsible for everything that happens. 6. Start with small acts of evil and work up from there. 7. Keep the amplification of evil so gradual as to hardly be noticeable. 8. Gradually change the nature of the authority from “just” to “unjust” and demanding and even irrational. 9. Make the exit costs high while allowing verbal dissent. And 10. Offer a “big lie” to justify everything. This is clearly a diabolically effective “stacked deck” that Milgram demonstrated works 90% of the time. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Problems in Society320 views0 answers0 votesZimbardo wrote, “This potential for authority figures to exercise power over subordinates can have disastrous consequences in many domains of life. … Such authority can lead to flight errors when the crew feels forced to accept the “authority’s definition of the situation, even when the authority is wrong.” An investigation of thirty-seven serious plane accidents where there was sufficient data from voice recorders revealed that in 81 percent of these cases, the first officer did not properly monitor or challenge the captain when he made errors. … We may conclude that excessive obedience may cause as many as 25% of all airplane accidents.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Problems in Society255 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola