DWQA Questions › Tag: life missionFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesWe have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma119 views0 answers0 votesWe know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma127 views0 answers0 votesWe know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma88 views0 answers0 votesThere is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma65 views0 answers0 votesCreator is concerned with the spiritual growth of the individual (and even species) but karma looks geared to not be at all concerned with that agenda. Rather, it simply responds to energy perturbations in a literal tit-for-tat fashion. Karma is not concerned either, about a mission life underway; and if there is an opportunity to introduce a karmic response, it will simply do so in a kind of mechanical, automatic way. Does any cancellation or attenuation necessitate a divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma82 views0 answers0 votesThere is the karmic problem of returning a response to a perpetrator with a dramatically different makeup from the initial victim triggering the karmic debt. For instance, the same shove delivered to one individual is an annoyance but breaks the bones of someone frail. How would this debt be handled? Does karma wait for the perpetrator to be born frail? But even if frail, a psychopathic personality might absorb such a shove very differently than the initial victim, even if the broken bones are the same or similar. Then there is the dilemma of the first victim having a karmic recurrence of the shove themselves. So do we have both the perpetrator and victim getting the SAME karmic response? OR does the perpetrator simply return as another perpetrator and the victim as well, to again be a victim? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma75 views0 answers0 votesRegardless of the workings of karma itself, we have learned that divine intervention is the means to heal, avoid, and/or reduce and attenuate karmic debts and dilemmas. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Memory Reset, and Divine Life Support bring about the desired divine intervention to heal karmic difficulties?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma81 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I wonder if we have fully addressed the concept of God’s grace. The term was used often in my Catholic youth but I’m not sure if I know what it is, or if such an independent energy exists. Is God’s grace another term for love and light? Is it something that flows automatically when healing occurs? Is it a human contrived concept to explain why others have comforts that you do not, to keep you striving? Is it a by-product of healing or a bonus? Is it the secret ingredient, or rocket fuel that hasn’t occurred to us to request by name? If it is something that can be requested, maybe now’s the time. What is Creator’s perspective on this?”ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Creator178 views0 answers0 votesPerhaps one of the biggest problems facing humanity is “engineered complacency.” What is the fundamental state of human curiosity when suppressed by mind control manipulation? Is the curiosity restrained or actually destroyed? Because if merely restrained, then once the mind control tapers off or ceases altogether, will curiosity EXPLODE within the masses of humanity? Or will there be something akin to cellular memory working that will keep a kind of learned self-suppression going even when the overt mind control comes to an end? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Limiting Beliefs166 views0 answers0 votesWe know the deep subconscious is the principal repository of hidden and not consciously recognized beliefs. How much is conscious belief built on a substrate of unconscious beliefs? When someone says, “I am an Atheist,” as an expression of their belief that God does not exist, can such a conscious belief survive if Deep Subconscious Memory Reset changed the underlying unconscious beliefs underpinning the conscious ones? Can the divine even change the underlying beliefs if the conscious mind has embraced a summation or capstone of the underlying beliefs?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Limiting Beliefs150 views0 answers0 votesWe know the divine cannot act unilaterally to change beliefs in the deep subconscious. Can healing requests by third parties give the divine the needed license it needs to make belief changes, even, and in spite of, firmly held conscious beliefs of the individual client, and if so, how can that be ethical?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Limiting Beliefs166 views0 answers0 votesWould the conscious manifestation of subconscious belief changes be the increasing experience of doubt, and perhaps even the tenuous emergence of guilt feelings? Is sudden or even creeping doubt the erosion of conscious belief on account of the supporting unconscious beliefs changing? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Limiting Beliefs147 views0 answers0 votesDoubt and feelings of guilt for the vast majority of humans (and probably all sentient beings) are profoundly uncomfortable feelings. They compel some sort of response on the part of the conscious self. That response will be either self-reflection or “projection” due to an unwillingness to ascribe any responsibility to the self. A challenge to deeply held beliefs from outside the self must be identified and destroyed, either figuratively or literally. This appears to be the driving force behind almost all forms of censorship. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Limiting Beliefs146 views0 answers0 votesIs it possible that divine healing could actually make a being even MORE dangerous, at least temporarily? If changing subconscious beliefs makes them more consciously uncertain as a result, would this have the unintended consequence of making them even more fanatical witch hunters as they desperately seek an external cause for their discomfort and attempt to destroy it? Is this some of the dynamic behind the desire of interlopers to annihilate humanity—creeping doubt about themselves and the dawning of guilt feelings they cannot tolerate? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Limiting Beliefs132 views0 answers0 votesGandhi quoted Emerson, who said, “Foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.” But wouldn’t that literally describe EVERY member of the Extraterrestrial Alliance? Doubt and accepting any form of guilt is enemy number one to any psychopath. They will go to almost any extreme to remove it. And yet, can any turnaround happen without it, and without it being eventually embraced by the psychopathic self? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • Limiting Beliefs150 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola