DWQA Questions › Tag: Law of KarmaFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “How many deep subconscious minds does our larger soul have, altogether? One per soul extension, one per lifetime, or is the separate existence of our deep subconscious mind so much a product of interloper manipulations that it comes about only while we are incarnated in a species that has been impaired to have a separate deep subconscious mind? I remember a GetWisdom channeling that part of a walk-in’s duty is to take up the former body owners’ deep subconscious mind, due to that body’s continuing connection to the DNA and akashic records of the former occupant, so perhaps we have a separate deep subconscious for each bodily incarnation?” Is that so?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Subconscious Mind379 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “We know each person is one small part of a soul. Can we do a subconscious channeling, with Holographic Memory Resolution, of an entire soul, which is made up of many people, so that we can heal people in the same soul group, instead of one person at a time?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Subconscious Channeling312 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “A friend of mine suggested I contact you to ask for help. It is for my father who suddenly became very ill in December and is suffering both physically and psychologically. Being now in what looks like an irreversible condition, he has lost interest for life. However, as his son, I would like to help him the best I can, if possible. Is it something you may help on, please?” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Spirit Meddlers340 views0 answers0 votesThere is a story of an architect who built a house in New Mexico on a rocky hillside with a beautiful view. During the construction, a couple of large rocks were moved. Not long after the house was finished his business began to suffer and he was diagnosed with cancer. In desperation, he consulted a Native American healer who said the earth and rock spirits were upset because moving those rocks upset the energy balance in the area. That imbalance combined with the intense anger of the nature spirits caused his business failures and cancer. When he restored the rocks, his problems disappeared. Given our disconnected state, this seems like yet another invisible hazard. Can Creator comment?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Elementals479 views0 answers0 votesIt’s probably safe to assume that the shamans of most indigenous tribes around the globe could readily talk to nature spirits, and some still can today. What percentage of indigenous people could talk to nature spirits routinely say 500 years ago before being disturbed by European cultures?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Elementals451 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help get the entirety of humanity back on the road to full communication and partnership with nature spirits?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Elementals463 views0 answers0 votes“To intervene, or not to intervene, that is the question,” was never penned by Shakespeare, but perhaps should have been. For our purposes, we’ll define intervention as the uninvited insertion of self into the lives or activities of others. Those others can be strangers or even close family. Intentionally inserting oneself into the lives of others is a bold move, and one is always risking being rejected or repulsed when they do so. What is Creator’s perspective on this art of living dilemma?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma314 views0 answers0 votesThen there is the “Good Samaritan” dilemma. There is no shortage of people in need in this world. And there is a line of thinking that the need itself is one’s invitation, or even mandate in the opinion of some, to intervene for their benefit and upliftment. The downside is the ever-present risk of unintended consequences. One is the often overlooked acquisition of a “responsibility.” For instance, there is a legal recognition of duty to complete a rescue once commenced. There is no duty to rescue a drowning person, especially if you yourself cannot swim. But, once you make the decision to try and rescue, you are now bound by law to make every reasonable effort to complete the task. Failure to do so can result in liability to the victim. What is Creator’s perspective on the all or nothing perspective toward “Good Samaritans?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma286 views0 answers0 votesParents and teachers are confronted with this art of living dilemma on practically a daily basis. There is probably not a child in existence who hasn’t screamed at an adult at least once “let me do it!!!” But of course, adults cannot let children go ahead and do just anything they want without supervision. Too much supervision is stultifying, and too little exposes the vulnerable to enhanced dangers. Can Creator share any rules of thumb that will help supervisors intervene only when necessary and with maximum divine balance and wisdom?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma300 views0 answers0 votesIn Texas a few years ago, a young man who had learned a few tentative Aikido moves (a martial art), found himself in a convenience store just as it was being robbed. Rather than stay out of it, he intervened and used his fledgling skills to execute a shihonage (she-ho-nah-gay) move. The result was the robber fell backwards having lost all balance and cracked his skull on the tile floor, dying moments later. Can Creator comment on the karmic consequences of his decision, and whether the divine considers his actions intervention or interference?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma334 views0 answers0 votesA massively popular recording artist witnessed the drowning of a friend as a child. An older teenager was there as well, and this person just stood there and watched, and did nothing beyond saying “hold on.” The artist came to blame this person for the drowning death of his friend because he chose not to intervene. Decades later, the recording artist wrote a song recounting the event, invited the now much older adult but then-teenager to the song’s premiere in front of an audience of thousands, seating him in the center front row. He then sang the song that went on to become one of this recording artist’s biggest hits, mocking the man with his own words “hold on.” The man went home and hanged himself as a result of the shaming. What is Creator’s perspective of both the teen’s inaction and the later retribution by the recording artist?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma340 views0 answers0 votesIt’s rare when parents perfectly share the most enlightened approach to raising children. Not only do they have to navigate the relationship with their own child, but often find themselves witnesses to the unhealthy relationships between their child and the other parent. Intervening in these relationships is fraught with all kinds of hazards up to and including divorce and custody battles. When a spouse is confronted with a spouse whose parenting skills leave something to be desired, and are rooted in deeply held beliefs they are in no mood to have questioned, yet clearly are problematic and perhaps even damaging to the children, what is Creator’s advice for a parent simply wanting the best outcome for all involved?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma361 views0 answers0 votesAsking a stranger or acquaintance out on a date is arguably a form of “uninvited intervention” bordering on interference. Yet, for much of history, men were encouraged to pursue this “outreach” and women were encouraged, and even coached, to be tolerant, even to an extreme at times. That is all changing now with today’s young people. Even approaching the opposite extreme of considering even a single humble proposition, a form of “violent assault.” Can Creator comment?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma343 views0 answers0 votesThere is a story of a seeker who approached a guru asking to take up advanced spiritual training with enlightenment as the goal. The guru said, “we must first test your readiness.” The guru then handed the applicant three humungous baked potatoes and instructed him to eat them right away. The problem was, the applicant, anticipating a life devoid of luxuries, had just come from a goodbye feast where he had already stuffed himself to the brim. Alone, staring at the potatoes and knowing he could not possibly eat them in the time expected, saw a homeless man off in the distance. He approached the homeless man and offered him the biggest potato. The homeless man accepted, and the applicant then choked down the other two. Returning to the guru, the guru asked if he had indeed consumed all three potatoes. The applicant hesitated for a moment and then confessed what he had done with the biggest potato. He then challenged the guru about the virtue of charity, and does that not override the demands of the test? The guru responded with the question “Did the homeless man ASK YOU for the potato?” Upon saying “no,” the guru rejected the applicant, and claimed he was not ready for advanced training. What is Creator’s perspective of this story?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma362 views0 answers0 votesThere is a popular notion that one should never give advice unless asked for it. A high school student who worked in a repair garage evenings and weekends was in an auto shop class and instructed to do an oil change with a small group of fellow students. One of the bigger more aggressive students started removing the drain plug. The experienced student suggested that he not pull the plug away but hold it in place until he was sure it was loose, and then pull it away quickly. The intended and very over-confident recipient of this wise advice told the experienced student to “buzz off” in so many words, and then proceeded to cover himself in oil with the other students howling with laughter. What is Creator’s perspective on giving unsolicited advice?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma308 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola