DWQA Questions › Tag: karmic responsibilityFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “Without a belief in the divine, who or what do extraterrestrials think the fallen angels are?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs291 views0 answers0 votesRichard Rogers said: “The Athenians had an oath for someone who was about to become a citizen. They had to swear that ‘I shall leave the city not less but more beautiful than I found it.'” This would be considered a positive oath. What is Creator’s perspective, and is this oath truly benign?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma325 views0 answers0 votesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote: “… a man who belongs to a given nation is obviously neither guilty nor meritorious by that fact alone. His guilt would begin when, for example, he did not cultivate in himself the special talents of the nation, or took no part in national cultural values; while he would be acting meritoriously if he overcame in himself certain characterological weaknesses of the nation by a conscious process of self-examination.” Frankl’s perspective is quite thought provoking when it is understood that some of the most common oaths sworn today are to the nations that people live in. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma258 views0 answers0 votesNorman Douglas said: “Never take a solemn oath. People might think you mean it.” This would be especially true if it was a “witnessed” event. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma270 views0 answers0 votesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote: “Every one of us knows somehow that the content of his life is somehow preserved and saved.” If the taking of an oath is an affirmative deed that becomes recorded for all of time in the akashic records, one can never get away from it completely, and at the very least, the event will always be in the recorded history of the soul. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma337 views0 answers0 votesThe most pernicious form of oath is the loyalty oath accompanied by a requirement to carry out a nefarious deed, such as killing another human being. Some people consider this urban myth and don’t want to believe that this actually happens. However, a recent local story about a random shooting was published in Grand Rapids, Michigan. For the story, the reporter consulted with a former Chicago gang member for his analysis. The consultant says to join the gang the shooter was suspected of trying to join, a person must kill a rival gang member or someone random. But the rules are they can’t get caught. What can Creator tell us? Is this an urban myth? And if not, how widespread a problem is it?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma269 views0 answers0 votesIt would seem that the power of an oath depends on how successfully it alters and/or cements belief. Is it correct to say it’s not the oath itself that binds, but the effect it has on the beliefs of oath takers, oath administrators, and oath witnesses?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma243 views0 answers0 votesGeorge Washington said: “Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation deserts the oaths.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma275 views0 answers0 votesWhat is Creator’s perspective on the American “Pledge of Allegiance?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma294 views0 answers0 votesSamuel Coleridge Taylor said: “The present system of taking oaths is horrible. It is awfully absurd to make a man invoke God’s wrath upon himself, if he speaks false; it is, in my judgment, a sin to do so.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma274 views0 answers0 votesThe Lightworker Healing Protocol expressly lists “oaths” as a spiritual reality requiring healing intervention. Can Creator summarize why this is so, and how Empowered Prayer and The Lightworker Healing Protocol are the most effective means to reverse the damage to the soul they can do?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma251 views0 answers0 votesThe essence of enlightenment is to be fully in alignment with the divine. It seems arrogance of any kind would be a good indicator of how far away or close one is in terms of divine alignment. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs222 views0 answers0 votesSetbacks for the arrogant appear to either induce humility, or rage, perhaps even a complex mix of the two. Resulting rage can be targeted at the self, others, or both. What is it about rage that can overwhelm humility, and even eventually extinguish it all together?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs218 views0 answers0 votesIt would seem that humility is in fact a striving for excellence, while rage is a striving for revenge. The lust for power seems to be a desire to give everyone a successful comeuppance—except for the self. Unchecked, it seems rage begets more and more rage until the mind is filled with nothing else. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs233 views0 answers0 votesThe size of a setback can have a significant bearing on whether the result is humility or rage. For instance, a parking ticket legitimately earned, even if unintentionally, is likely to result in humility. But if the car is towed, impounded, and quickly sold at auction the next day by corrupt officials, the result is not likely to be “humility.” Some setbacks are karmic, but others are first offenses or unearned and undeserved insults. Humility seems to have the deck stacked against it in these situations. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs232 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola