DWQA Questions › Tag: karmic lessonsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesYou have taught us that emotion is energy in motion, and a kind of language that contains an intention with an agenda. Is emotion a particular form of nonlocal consciousness that can be felt more strongly by the body, and picked up more readily by others, intuitively, who can tell when we are upset? If not, in what ways does it differ?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness201 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Does a child being young and not yet heavily influenced by the mold of the world or karmic consequences, have a higher rate of belief quotient when it comes to their prayer requests to Creator? Can their prayer requests coming from the heart without fear have the power to ‘move mountains?'”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer279 views0 answers0 votesIs life force energy from Creator supplied to incarnated humans via the interdimensional DNA? If not, how is that done?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma261 views0 answers0 votesOne word that Creator has not commented on at length is “acclimation.” A walk in soul with a long history of fearlessness, suddenly found itself in a 22 year old body riddled with anxiety, stress, and depression. Creator has shared that the walk-in does not inherit the deep subconscious of the departing individual, but it does appear to inherit the previous inhabitant’s cellular memory. It took 20 years for the feelings of depression, stress, and anxiety to gradually wither and cease altogether. During the entire time, the walk-in internally labeled these emotions illegitimate and simply ignored them and struggled to live life, often in complete opposition to them. Why did it take 20 years, and what lessons can be learned from this walk-in’s experience?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Corruption264 views0 answers0 votesDid the above walk-in soul choose the walk-in incarnation experience over a natural birth in order to remind itself what fear, anxiety, and stress actually felt like again, as one of the motives? When one becomes fearless (relatively so) it can be very difficult to empathize with the overwhelming majority of humanity who deal with such emotions almost continuously. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Corruption312 views0 answers0 votesDivine healing is certainly one way to clean up the traumatic energy in the akashic records that alarms and triggers the deep subconscious that is always looking for threats and hazards. But isn’t that a kind of an “end-around” to the karmic design of the system? It certainly seems like an intervention into a process and dynamic that should normally be more self-maintaining and automatic. Does suffering “bravely borne” slowly bleed away some of this built-up trauma recorded in the akashic record? Like a drip, drip, drip that eventually empties the pool if persisted long enough?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Corruption210 views0 answers0 votesDoes the interdimensional DNA link human beings to their soul, or to the akashic records, or both?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma310 views0 answers0 votesWhat are the functions of interdimensional DNA? Are they involved with both the mind and the body?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma280 views0 answers0 votesCan we assume that the term “interdimensional DNA” is just a metaphor representing the ability to generate end products, analogous to the gene expression function of physical DNA to make proteins in living cells?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma263 views0 answers0 votesBarry Ritholz said, “Little white lies are told by humans all the time. Indeed, lying is often how we get through each day in a happy little bubble. We spend time and energy rationalizing our own behaviors, beliefs, and decision-making processes.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance227 views0 answers0 votesDale Carnegie wrote the multi-million bestseller, How to Win Friends and Influence People. Advocates would say that Carnegie taught a method of manipulating people that created “win-win” scenarios, where both the manipulated and manipulators benefited. The detractors would say Carnegie’s methods can be used to screw people. Any kind of indirect manipulation is problematic, as it arguably violates free will, especially if used to encourage “uninformed” decisions. Hypnotist and Researcher Dick Sutphen wrote of Carnegie in his book, Radical Spirituality, “The Carnegie Course teaches you to say what will work to get what you want. Isn’t that being phony or a hypocrite? Forget sincerity, forget honesty. Forget being real. Carnegie teaches you to be a diplomat and wear a mask. Masks are the fear that who and what you are isn’t adequate, so you pretend to be somebody else.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance242 views0 answers0 votesSutphen, additionally, said this about Carnegie techniques, “If you use Carnegie techniques to win friends, the friendship has to be based upon a two-way manipulation. You pretend to be the mask to attain friendship and they will be your friend as long as you wear it. What happens when your mask slips and they find out who you really are? Do you need any relationship or association so badly that you’re willing to repress your real self in order to attain it?” Many would answer YES – they have a mortgage to pay, and must wear the mask in order to stay employed. Sutphen was an independent businessman and had more freedom in that regard. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance249 views0 answers0 votesA close cousin of “white lies” are “lies of omission.” In navigating this world, one encounters people with “false impressions” based on judgments made quickly with incomplete information, or biases where contrary evidence is simply ignored. In these situations, allowing a person to continue believing and acting in a way that is contrary to the actual truth of a situation is often characterized as “lying by omission.” There can be countless motivations for doing this, from greed to sympathy to personal safety. Some would argue that lies of omission are just as dishonest as overt lies. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance240 views0 answers0 votesChildren are arguably told more white lies than anyone. Most people would argue that this is an imperative and that it would be almost impossible to raise healthy children without having to resort to them. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance243 views0 answers0 votesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote that in his opinion, it was possible to “lie with the truth.” He cited as an example a man who came to him plagued with guilt about an illicit affair he had some 20 years earlier. His wife never learned of it and was still ignorant of it when he sought Frankl’s advice. Dr. Frankl implored him NOT to tell her. His reason for doing so was because he believed that the man truly loved his wife and had no desire to traumatize her. Based on what he knew of the man’s wife, he was convinced that there was little to no chance of the wife receiving the news without drawing the false conclusion that he did not love her, and consequently would not be able to forgive him. So he attempted to coach the man, that telling her the truth, would be akin to lying, for it would encourage her to believe a lie—that her husband did not ever love her. The man ignored Frankl’s advice, and the result was an ugly divorce with both parties deeply emotionally traumatized. Was Frankl right? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance303 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola