DWQA Questions › Tag: karmic consequencesFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA practitioner writes: “Have the ETs mastered manipulation of cellular memory? Do they do it through consciousness or only technology?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control293 views0 answers0 votesLove is the glue that keeps families together, and helps foster a nurturing and supportive environment for humans in particular. In loveless worlds, that tie would presumably no longer bind. However, karmic ties would still be operative and would bring beings together to relive their karmic dilemmas over and over again. Do Anunnaki mates from billions of years ago still have karmic ties that would bring them together yet again, and again and again? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers219 views0 answers0 votesWould it be helpful to add a specific request somewhere in the LHP for healing of wounded interdimensional DNA and the morphogenetic field, or will these two, more indirectly worded requests be sufficient to do all that may be needed?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol143 views0 answers0 votesWhy is there such an emphasis on celibacy in nearly all religious traditions? What are the advantages, and what are the disadvantages?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Corruption266 views0 answers0 votesMost cultures have strong taboos in place regarding children and early sex education. Are those taboos enlightened or naive?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Corruption253 views0 answers0 votesWhat is it about pornography that makes it so incredibly addicting to so many people?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Corruption267 views0 answers0 votesIf human sex is “loveless,” is it all then completely about domination, potency, and control exclusively? Males try to conquer and “win over” the female, while the female attempts to control through rationing and choosing a partner tactically to provide greater personal security, and perhaps support for child-rearing. Is it all just a chess-like power play without love?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Corruption229 views0 answers0 votesMonica Raymond said, “Little white lies are part of everyday life. If you’re in court being charged with a felony, you’re probably going to be tempted to lie. Or if your girlfriend asks you if the sweater she is wearing makes her look fat; you’re going to lie because you love that person. There are different reasons and justifications to lie; it’s human nature.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance241 views0 answers0 votesPamela Meyer said, “White lies keep social dignity intact and are far more prevalent than most people realize. Several studies have found that an average person is lied to from 10 to 200 times a day – mostly just to keep a conversation going, to avoid conflict, or to establish a connection with someone.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance257 views0 answers0 votesBarry Ritholz said, “Little white lies are told by humans all the time. Indeed, lying is often how we get through each day in a happy little bubble. We spend time and energy rationalizing our own behaviors, beliefs, and decision-making processes.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance233 views0 answers0 votesDale Carnegie wrote the multi-million bestseller, How to Win Friends and Influence People. Advocates would say that Carnegie taught a method of manipulating people that created “win-win” scenarios, where both the manipulated and manipulators benefited. The detractors would say Carnegie’s methods can be used to screw people. Any kind of indirect manipulation is problematic, as it arguably violates free will, especially if used to encourage “uninformed” decisions. Hypnotist and Researcher Dick Sutphen wrote of Carnegie in his book, Radical Spirituality, “The Carnegie Course teaches you to say what will work to get what you want. Isn’t that being phony or a hypocrite? Forget sincerity, forget honesty. Forget being real. Carnegie teaches you to be a diplomat and wear a mask. Masks are the fear that who and what you are isn’t adequate, so you pretend to be somebody else.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance248 views0 answers0 votesSutphen, additionally, said this about Carnegie techniques, “If you use Carnegie techniques to win friends, the friendship has to be based upon a two-way manipulation. You pretend to be the mask to attain friendship and they will be your friend as long as you wear it. What happens when your mask slips and they find out who you really are? Do you need any relationship or association so badly that you’re willing to repress your real self in order to attain it?” Many would answer YES – they have a mortgage to pay, and must wear the mask in order to stay employed. Sutphen was an independent businessman and had more freedom in that regard. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance259 views0 answers0 votesA close cousin of “white lies” are “lies of omission.” In navigating this world, one encounters people with “false impressions” based on judgments made quickly with incomplete information, or biases where contrary evidence is simply ignored. In these situations, allowing a person to continue believing and acting in a way that is contrary to the actual truth of a situation is often characterized as “lying by omission.” There can be countless motivations for doing this, from greed to sympathy to personal safety. Some would argue that lies of omission are just as dishonest as overt lies. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance250 views0 answers0 votesChildren are arguably told more white lies than anyone. Most people would argue that this is an imperative and that it would be almost impossible to raise healthy children without having to resort to them. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance253 views0 answers0 votesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote that in his opinion, it was possible to “lie with the truth.” He cited as an example a man who came to him plagued with guilt about an illicit affair he had some 20 years earlier. His wife never learned of it and was still ignorant of it when he sought Frankl’s advice. Dr. Frankl implored him NOT to tell her. His reason for doing so was because he believed that the man truly loved his wife and had no desire to traumatize her. Based on what he knew of the man’s wife, he was convinced that there was little to no chance of the wife receiving the news without drawing the false conclusion that he did not love her, and consequently would not be able to forgive him. So he attempted to coach the man, that telling her the truth, would be akin to lying, for it would encourage her to believe a lie—that her husband did not ever love her. The man ignored Frankl’s advice, and the result was an ugly divorce with both parties deeply emotionally traumatized. Was Frankl right? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance311 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola