DWQA Questions › Tag: intuitive gateway
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Castaneda asks Don Juan, “And what can he do to overcome fear?” Don Juan replies, “The answer is very simple. He must not run away. He must defy his fear, and in spite of it must take the next step in learning, and the next, and the next. He must be fully afraid, and yet he must not stop. That is the rule! And a moment will come when his enemy (fear) retreats. The man begins to feel sure of himself. His intent becomes stronger. Learning is no longer a terrifying task. When this joyful moment comes, the man can say without hesitation that he has defeated his first natural enemy.” Castaneda asks if it happens all at once or little by little? Don Juan says, “It happens little by little, and yet fear is vanquished suddenly and fast.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
Don Juan talks about three other enemies to becoming a man of knowledge. But before we explore those, we know the fallen angelics and the billions of members of the Extraterrestrial Alliance are depraved. Sitting Bull said that depravity was a state of mind that is capable of experiencing pleasure only through instigating or vicariously witnessing the suffering of others. There is no other source of pleasure to the depraved mind. Are all depraved beings also fearful, or have some of them conquered fear as Don Juan suggests, the direct question being, “Are there fearless depraved beings?” If there are, that would appear to be a formidable foe indeed. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
229 views0 answers0 votes
Don Juan talks about the next natural enemy to becoming a man of knowledge. “Clarity! That clarity of mind, which is so hard to obtain, dispels fear, but also blinds. It forces the man never to doubt himself. It gives him the assurance he can do anything he pleases, for he sees clearly into everything. And he is courageous because he is clear, and he stops at nothing because he is clear. But all that is a mistake; it is like something incomplete. If the man yields to this make-believe power, he has succumbed to his second enemy and will fumble with learning. He will rush when he should be patient, or he will be patient when he should rush. And he will fumble with learning until he winds up incapable of learning anything more.” This sounds like a kind of arrogance, that the being defeated by clarity is one who thinks himself, falsely, as enlightened—falsely complete. Don Juan says, “He will no longer learn or yearn for anything.” Sounds like a lot of atheists and skeptics! (Which we know the ETs are.) The antithesis of humility. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
Castaneda asks how to avoid being defeated by clarity. Don Juan responds, “He must do what he did with fear. He must defy his clarity and use it only to see, and wait patiently and measure carefully before taking new steps; he must think, above all, that his clarity (his enlightenment?) is almost a mistake. And a moment will come when he will understand that his clarity was only a point before his eyes. He will know at this point that the power he has been pursuing is finally his. He can do with it whatever he pleases. His wish is the rule. He sees all that is around him. But he has also come to his third enemy, Power!” Fear and clarity (or arrogance) can interfere with obtaining true power. What is Creator’s perspective on Don Juan’s recipe for overcoming the second natural enemy to enlightenment—clarity?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
267 views0 answers0 votes
Don Juan talks of the third natural enemy to enlightenment: “Power is the strongest of all enemies. And naturally the easiest thing to do is to give in; after all, the man (or the being) is truly invincible. He commands; he begins by taking calculated risks, and ends in making rules, because he is a master. A man at this stage hardly notices his third enemy (power) closing in on him. And suddenly, without knowing, he will certainly have lost the battle. His enemy (power) will have turned him into a cruel, capricious man. Such a man has no command over himself, and cannot tell when or how to use his power.” The mistake, it appears, is thinking the power is HIS to use as he pleases. He thinks he owns the power, rather than being a steward of it. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
227 views0 answers0 votes
Castaneda asks Don Juan how to defeat the third enemy to enlightenment—power. Don Juan responds, “He has to defy it, deliberately. He has to come to realize the power he has seemingly conquered is in reality never his. He must keep himself in line at all times, handling carefully and faithfully all he has learned. If he can see that clarity and power, without his control over himself, are worse than mistakes, he will reach a point where everything is held in check. He will know when and how to use his power. And thus he will have defeated his third enemy.” Is it safe to assume that all the fallen angelics and ET Alliance members have been defeated by the enemy, power, if not by clarity (or arrogance) and fear, that NONE of them have “control over themselves?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
246 views0 answers0 votes
In all the questions asked so far, there was no mention of divine partnership. It seems Don Juan was giving a tutorial on how to achieve enlightenment without Creator’s assistance, which is apparently something very few can ever manage on their own. How does partnership with the divine, using Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol, make the genuine attainment of enlightenment, and the defeat of the enemies of enlightenment, possible for the many, instead of the intrepid few?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
232 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “The I Am America Project originally suggested for a removal of the “etheric veil” that surrounds this planet. This was to be done by 12 people with assistance of an Ascended Master they had “I assume” contacted psychically somehow. Now I am well aware of how easily these messages can be corrupted. However, you have only told me in the past that the I Am America Project comes from a Divine source and that its teachings still hold true. Would it somehow be beneficial to add the removal of the “etheric veil” to the LHP? The idea behind this being it would allow people to see what is truly going on in our world and would lessen any confusion a great deal. Now this in itself could cause a whole host of other issues if done incorrectly or at the wrong time, but I still strongly feel it is at least worth asking about.” Would this be helpful to include in the Lightworker Healing Protocol?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
240 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “My dear uncle who died from cancer once appeared in a dream and told me in old dialect: “Keep on healing.” He was smiling and seemed happy. Was this real communication? Did his soul contact me? I ask in hope that this question could help others, too, who see so much in dreams that is often helpful.”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
284 views0 answers0 votes
He also asks: “Do souls come to ask help from us? Is it connected to the deep subconscious that shows us these “movies?” I have put them often in my session work. I feel they need help…”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
239 views0 answers0 votes
In a previous radio show exploring sudden psychic abilities, Creator said that only one in 50,000 people had profound psychic abilities, and were universally on mission lives to be endowed with this capability. Why so very, very few? Is this small number about the size the Extraterrestrial Alliance will tolerate? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
259 views0 answers0 votes
Is another reason there are so few, because of the divine injunction against forcing non believers to change their belief by providing overwhelming evidence, as opposed to a free will exploring of ideas, rather than imposition of belief? One of the reasons skeptics seem to have an easy time dismissing such extraordinary abilities is their incredible rarity in the population. What can Creator share with us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
226 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona has spent much of his career exploring paranormal phenomena shunned by the vast majority of his colleagues. He is the author of numerous books on paranormal topics and has conducted a number of high-profile experiments with astonishing results. It’s almost a miracle in its own right that he has avoided scandal and has managed to retain his employment as a tenured faculty member. Were his career and the careers of his close compatriots protected and facilitated by the divine realm? Why are there so few like Gary Schwartz as such open-minded academic scholars appear to be even rarer than the mediums he’s studied? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
217 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Schwartz and colleagues conducted a number of experiments with high profile mediums in the late nineties that resulted in both a book, The Afterlife Experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death, and an HBO special entitled “Life Afterlife.” The experiments were conducted in such a way, that no truly objective mind could dismiss the findings as essentially proving beyond a reasonable doubt, that these mediums were legitimately able to see, hear and communicate readily with the dead. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
The HBO special “Life Afterlife” was another story, however. Dr. Schwartz wrote: “HBO had made a beautiful, inspiring show. But the science was sandwiched in the middle and lost nearly all its impact. We had expected that the show would leave the audience feeling ‘Science can be brought to bear on these issues,’ and ‘Wow, those mediums were tested by science and actually were found to be doing what they claimed.’ Instead, the show was good entertainment but little more. We had thought HBO really cared about the science, but discovered what the producers most wanted was to see how many people were crying when the lights went up. After all, HBO didn’t really care about making a scientific statement.” In fact, HBO had given almost as much air time to skeptics, as they did Dr. Schwartz’s experiments. The producers apparently believed they were being “professional and fair” giving equal time to skeptics and therefore creating a “balanced” presentation. But in this case, it seems a “balanced” presentation is simply sinister. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
239 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…3233343536…56Next »
Ask Question