DWQA Questions › Tag: intellectFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesCreator has shared that humans are divine, but that atheism leads inexorably to depravity. Most atheists have a kind of utopian outlook for atheism that itself is a kind of fairy tale that doesn’t hold water when examined critically. Showing them that all atheistic outlooks eventually lead to depravity on a gargantuan scale, has been found to be an effective, but not pleasant approach to “raining on their parade.” This seems contrary to the preferred divine means of spreading love through positive reinforcements and messaging. Can Creator comment on the importance of “telling it like it is?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs356 views0 answers0 votesThe reality and nature of consciousness is one of the central topics of contention when conversing with atheists. Most do not believe in the existence of non-local consciousness in any form. Yet Creator has shared that everything is consciousness in actuality, and the interlopers would seem to have an outlook on non-local consciousness that is not as strict as that embraced by human atheists. What is the difference in outlook if any? Do the interlopers view the universe as primarily “dead,” as opposed to the divine reality of it all being ALIVE? Creator shared that the alien outlook is that non-local consciousness is a kind of “echo” that is a reflection of consciousness, but not ACTUALLY consciousness? Can Creator clarify whether or how true that is?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs294 views0 answers0 votesIt has been observed, that for most human atheists, the REAL bone of contention, isn’t the existence or non-existence of God, but rather the rejection of a tyrannical, hypocritical, arbitrary and capricious God who they view as “no friend of theirs.” In some ways, it appears like an ironic rejection of the Extraterrestrial Alliance who in fact are the ones who actually behave this way. Yet, it’s God who suffers the rejection. Can Creator comment on this perspective of atheists?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs308 views0 answers0 votesIt’s a long conversation to bring an atheist to the point where a discussion on the relative power and promise of prayer can even begin to be discussed. Atheists seem to want to avoid this particular topic more than any other. Can Creator share any insights on why this appears to be the case?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs332 views0 answers0 votesHow do prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol help the atheist to come around to actual REALITY? The reality of the divine?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs331 views0 answers0 votesHow would you make a case defending the reality of the divine to a group of atheists?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs348 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “There is a notion of cognitive empathy or perspective-taking. Some think this is not empathy at all. It’s defined as being able to put yourself into someone else’s place and see their perspective. Successful lawyers must possess this skill when representing clients whose situations the lawyer themselves would not personally find themselves in or condone. An observer, Daniel Goleman, author of Emotional Intelligence, noted that torturers would need to have good cognitive empathy to work out how best to hurt someone, but without having any sympathy towards them. Is that a fair use of the word empathy? Are the interlopers exercising cognitive empathy when manipulating us with mind control?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Metaphysics330 views0 answers0 votesWhat is the divine perspective of the saying: “When all else fails, read the instructions?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Guidance372 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Rational Thought is the one aspect of consciousness widely held to separate predominantly intelligent species from predominantly instinctual ones. Is it safe to say that rational thought is actually a creative thought process engaged in novel problem solving (novel for the being doing the problem solving) versus conditioned response (via instinct or behavioral modification perhaps)? The former is viewed as a predominately conscious, self-aware activity, while the latter is viewed as a predominantly unconscious activity lacking or at least not requiring self-awareness. How would Creator characterize this distinction in consciousness? What are we missing?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs322 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Observing humanity, a large spectrum is on display. From people who seem to operate mostly from conditioned responses, to those who truly seem to actively analyze everything around them consciously, enabling them to respond in novel unconventional ways that can be unpredictable and surprisingly effective (at least from the perspective of others). Emerson said, “foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.” Those who operate largely out of conditioning will struggle to find novel solutions to unanticipated and vexing problems, and rather, will keep applying the same conditioned response over and over again in spite of its continued failure or poor performance. With this postulate, how does Creator explain the difference in these two approaches to problem solving?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs325 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Rational thought appears to have a lot of enemies or potential obstacles or impairments to overcome. Karmic energy is clearly one of them. (As recognized in Creator’s recent revelation that “karma” was the cause of my complacency and feelings of futility when failing to act on my raccoon problem in a timely and rational fashion.) Fear of failure, and harsh judgment, and penalties is clearly another obstacle (which can all be heightened by karma created from past failures – including past life failures). Strong negative belief is yet another potential barrier (which also can be reinforced by karma). Then there are the physical, energetic barriers: fatigue, poor cognitive memory, lack of spatial discernment, dyslexia, etc. Rational thought has a LOT to overcome. Can Creator comment on why the deck is so stacked?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs320 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “While consciousness in the light has fewer barriers to rational thought, there must be some, otherwise, how could there ever have been fallen angels? Even though emotion is likely more balanced in the light because there are no “secrets,” and therefore fewer opportunities for misunderstandings, nevertheless, if a being decides that it does not “care” what fellow beings think and feel—all the while knowing of their consternation and disapproval, is that the beginning of their fall? Becoming a disease of the conscience? Where one continues to provoke suffering in others while having full knowledge and discernment of the suffering being caused, yet not caring? Did fallen angels discover through trial and error early on that being troublemakers was FUN. Can Creator comment on this problematic linkage between depravity, bullying and fun? Is the feeling of fun or deep satisfying pleasure partially a byproduct of life energy absorption stolen from the victims? And is an addiction to this rush of pleasure the principal fuel of the fall from the divine realm?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs388 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Another barrier to rational thought I would characterize as “entitlement belief” regardless of its genesis, and “expectation and anticipation equity.” Having just done a sports show, this is conveniently illustrated by the fan experience. Fans are not direct stakeholders in a sports franchise. They don’t own the team, the intellectual property, trademarks, the stadium, or anything of a tangible nature. They even have to PAY to consume the product, buy tickets, pay for parking, or suffer through commercials on television when watching a sports event. Yet, fans everywhere feel ENTITLED. They feel the team “owes” them something in exchange for the INVESTMENT the fan has made with them. And the more time the fan has spent being a fan for a particular team, the MORE they feel they are owed.”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs308 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “How much is the physical brain needed for true rational thought. We know that while being stuck in limbo the capacity to think rationally is GREATLY impaired. How much does the amount of life force energy available contribute to or impede rational thinking?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs327 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Is wisdom rational thinking, unencumbered and unimpeded?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs364 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola