DWQA Questions › Tag: human vulnerabilityFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesAustrian intuitive, Rudolf Steiner, reports from his own out-of-body direct spiritual explorations of the past that, in the time of Atlantis, most humans still possessed a kind of “dreamy clairvoyance” that most people would experience, especially between the state of being fully awake and deep sleep. And that this “dreamy clairvoyance” meant that people, at the time, accepted and took for granted the reality of the spirit world, unlike our fully materialistic viewpoint of today, especially among scientists. Nevertheless, this clairvoyance was passive rather than assertive, and the feeling of the I-self being in full control of the experience was absent. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls237 views0 answers0 votesSteiner went on to report that, at the time Jesus met with John the Baptist, the bulk of humanity no longer possessed even this “dreamy clairvoyance,” that the daily life of the average individual was as “hard-wired” to the five physical senses as it ever was, even in comparison to today. Steiner reports that, at the time of Christ, human intuitive reach was at perhaps its lowest ebb and presented a kind of “divine crisis” for the future of humanity. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls238 views0 answers0 votesAccording to Steiner, at the time of Christ, the human intuitive reach could only be realistically revived by initiation into mystery schools or severe and protracted spiritual training such as undertaken by the monastic branches of the different religions of the world. Meanwhile, indigenous peoples of the world used psychedelic drugs to “force awake” latent intuitive abilities. Most people born today with limited intuition believe that these paths still present the only realistic means to awaken profound intuitive abilities when one wants truly to extend their intuitive reach. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls224 views0 answers0 votesAccording to Steiner, as a result of his out-of-body examination of John the Baptist and his mission, he discovered that baptism at the time truly was, in fact, an induced “drowning.” Practitioners such as John the Baptist would hold the seeker of baptism underwater until their consciousness either left the body or was “loosened” from the body, but before death could occur. This was a way to “jump-start” the inculcation of more profound intuitive abilities. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls269 views0 answers0 votesSteiner saw his mission as two-fold, to share his findings from his own extensive spiritual explorations, as well as to try and “clone himself” and teach others exactly how to develop their intuitive reach to the extent he possessed and exercised. His assumption was that the only way to overcome the profound materialism taking over society was to counter it with a literal army of mystics and seers whose findings would oppose and eventually neutralize and discredit this materialism. Hence, his creation of Anthroposophy and Waldorf Schools was originally conceived as incubators for modern seers, a vision and goal that never fully materialized. Did this agenda have divine support at the time? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls222 views0 answers0 votesIt seems that at some point the interlopers “got wind” of what Steiner was up to and, as a result, that last decade of this life was a very, very difficult one. Hitler himself was personally opposed to Steiner and considered him a great enemy. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls272 views0 answers0 votesSteiner talked about “Brotherhoods of the Left” or evil brotherhoods that were the great problem of his time. Was he sensing the combined participation of select humans with the overarching control of the Extraterrestrial Alliance, especially Anunnaki psychics, without full appreciation that it was truly a galactic empire of physical aliens that constituted this “great and evil power” he frequently confronted in his spiritual explorations? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls229 views0 answers0 votesAs ambitious as Steiner’s agenda was, viewed from another angle, it might be regarded as a hopeless folly, especially when we consider that the Extraterrestrial Alliance’s decision to annihilate humanity ramped up shortly after his death. Did Steiner’s goals and activities of other intuitives in any way even contribute to the interlopers’ decision to annihilate humanity? Can Creator share with us how GetWisdom itself might be a divine response to the limited success and aftermath of Steiner’s mission life, and how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are now the means to saving humanity, and not necessarily the widespread development of profound intuitive reach?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls234 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “A popular New Age author and therapist, Doreen Virtue, known for preaching the use of guardian angels as spiritual healing through her program Angel Therapy, denounced her own work in 2017, saying, “I was deceived by New Age teachings and by demons who were posing as angels. Not one person in the Bible calls upon angels. If God wants to send an angel to someone, He will send it.” Now she is a born-again Christian and has retracted her New Age books, teachings, and oracle cards and focuses only on the Bible. I purchased several of her books and especially found the book, Archangels and Ascended Masters, helpful to me in difficult times. Is corruption the basis for her turnaround?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls285 views0 answers0 votesYou said about Rudolf Steiner’s future vision we quoted that, “You do not have 2500 years to work with any longer.” So Creator is implying, in a roundabout way, that what Steiner was seeing at the time, which was around 1915-1917 or so, was accurate at that time. So the interlopers firmly deciding to annihilate us must have come later. When, approximately, did they decide this, or was Steiner’s prophecy a false over-optimistic assumption all along?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda226 views0 answers0 votesMuch has been explored in this project on the types and uses of psychic ability and on the topic of channeling. Karl has even authored an ebook on the dangers of false channeling which can be downloaded for free at getwisdom.com/false. When channeling, one is carrying on a conversation, perceived within the mind, to learn something from an outside consciousness. This can be a low-level being or even all the way up to Creator, expressed through the channeler’s vocal cords to speak directly or in the form of their hand to conduct automatic writing. But with seership, one is sending out intuitive feelers, in a sense, going to see something for themselves, directly. Can Creator comment further on the difference between seers and channelers?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls188 views0 answers0 votesThe ability to apprehend spiritual realities directly does not necessarily imply any particular spiritual or moral orientation. This means there are benevolent seers and sinister seers. Rudolf Steiner is widely believed to be an example of a benevolent seer, and Aleister Crowley is an example of a widely regarded sinister seer. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls179 views0 answers0 votesWhen a seer speaks of a spiritual reality, they are supposedly speaking as a direct eyewitness. The same as one attempting to describe the Grand Canyon to someone who has never been there, one can never truly impart a full appreciation of the Grand Canyon through mere words or drawings, no matter how eloquent or gifted an artist they might be. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls160 views0 answers0 votesThe problem regarding eyewitnesses, and why eyewitness testimony is regarded as a fundamentally weak form of evidence, is the problem of perspective and the accuracy of comprehension. Two people can witness the same event, but then report wildly different details about what happened. One witness who knows cars, for example, might be able to report seeing a Plum Crazy 1970 Plymouth Cuda with a hockey stick stripe, 340 callouts, shaker hood, and black vinyl top with an Ohio plate, while the other witness saw a “purple car” and can’t report any more than that. When eye-witnessing and directly experiencing spiritual realities and reporting back on them, two seers can have the same issue. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls155 views0 answers0 votesAre Anunnaki psychics seers? Can all members of the Extraterrestrial Alliance be considered seers? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls306 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola