DWQA Questions › Tag: human suffering
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Did this situation arise due to prior karmic trauma history alone causing vulnerability, or was there active targeting by extraterrestrials affecting one or both parties to have a major spirit meddler attack with undermining of their relationship?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
60 views0 answers0 votes
Among the rumblings on the Internet about coming power outages is the prediction that when large-scale electrical grid outages occur, planes will also fall from the sky. Is that likely to happen as it would certainly increase the fear which you have told us is one of the goals of the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
125 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about the ongoing contamination of milk with harmful viruses by the extraterrestrials: “Maybe next webinar you could provide a bit more detail from Creator on the dairy products issue. My questions revolve around whether this is a current activity with the dairy products or has been going on for a long time? I have drunk milk for 73 years. Is it still a risk? Are there recommended alternatives like goat’s milk or soy milk?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
53 views0 answers0 votes
The viewer asks: “What is the probability of viral infection from being a regular milk drinker: 100%, 50%, etc?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
94 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Can the interlopers mind control someone with a “program” of narcissistic tendencies that they “install” like a sort of software, to make them act in a narcissistic way with SIMULATED behaviors, because they have learned that this will seriously disrupt human relationships and hurt both the target of the programming and their close ones, but without that person actually being a narcissist if it wasn’t for this program?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
Is such mind control actually one of the causes for the current seeming epidemic of narcissistic behavior and accusations of narcissism by those at the receiving end, especially women accusing men?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
If so, what percentage of narcissistic behavior is due to this weird cause, rather than actual cases of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD)?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
And if real, will this form of “fake” simulated narcissism suddenly end after the interlopers withdraw?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “I have a client who has become quite ill. He has had bad rheumatoid arthritis for years. In January he started getting mouth sores and little infections, and it has progressed rapidly… they did a bone marrow biopsy which eventually showed LGL, a more treatable leukemia…I would think the viral illness(es) still need to be addressed to alleviate his rheumatoid arthritis and now leukemia with secondary infections. Is this true? Would ivermectin be useful, or hydroxychloroquine, or both?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
83 views0 answers0 votes
Is Elon Musk’s prediction that the latest generation of Artificial Intelligence, called Sora, will eliminate human jobs and provide a brain-machine interface that will promote human evolution an accurate forecast? Is merging with AI the next step humanity will embark on? Is this actually sinister in its intentions? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
104 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “If we succeed in making the Extraterrestrial Alliance withdraw, would this be done with or without the knowledge of their hybrid minions in the global power structure?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will the Extraterrestrial Alliance’s hybrid minions be charged with keeping an eye on their farm, whilst away, maybe with the Mercenary Army Program recruits acting as overall watchdogs to ensure compliance?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
93 views0 answers0 votes
A former intelligence agent started a business coaching people in spy techniques and insights that he believed could be applied to everyday life to help people be more effective in accomplishing whatever it is they set out to do. Like most things in life, these techniques and understandings can be used for good or evil. A match can light a birthday candle or start a forest fire. To the extent that others might use these teachings for harm, how much karmic liability attaches to the teacher? Is this a reason why dangerous knowledge was historically reserved for initiates? And even that would seem to have karmic polarity in that it safeguards the innocent and immature on the one hand, but can also be a means to hoard and deny access to resources that one can argue should be more widely shared. What is Creator’s perspective on the “safe handling” and/or dissemination and sharing of material that is potentially helpful but equally dangerous?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
180 views0 answers0 votes
Intelligence agencies are in the business of gathering intelligence—information that is difficult to attain through ordinary means; information that people are hesitant and resistant to give up or share. The successful intelligence agent will employ the tools of motivation and manipulation to get this information. These tools are matched to particular means with which to motivate and/or manipulate people to get them to do what you want them to do. These approaches are referred to with the acronym “R.I.C.E.” Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. Of these four, appealing to ideology is seen as the most effective, and coercion the least. If you successfully appeal to ideology, the “target” will trust you and share almost anything. Coercion is the weakest as, contrary to Hollywood, it may work the first time you use it, but then you destroy trust and will have fewer opportunities for future success with the target. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
While being trained as an intelligence officer, this individual learned he was an ideal candidate because he was special (clearly an appeal to ego), or at least that is what he thought. But, in fact, he learned he was special because he had been algorithmically identified as psychologically damaged and traumatized in particular ways that were useful for intelligence gathering. These are people one would rarely label “well adjusted” by society’s standards. The agency was ruthlessly honest in telling him they intended to leverage that dysfunction, give him a vocabulary for understanding the nuances of human motivation and manipulation, and techniques for achieving goals and agendas with targets. In this undertaking, the overall wellbeing of the target is not a top consideration and moral flexibility was a prized capacity for successful agents. What is Creator’s perspective on the moral flexibility so highly prized by intelligence agencies?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…1314151617…159Next »