DWQA Questions › Tag: human rightsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesAccording to yourdictionary.com, Capitalism is “an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.” Laissez-faire capitalism is “abstention by governments from interfering in the workings of the free market.” Marx argues that without oversight, laissez-faire capitalism leads to a concentration of wealth, and exploitation of the working classes by the propertied classes. What is Creator’s perspective on this outlook?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society421 views0 answers0 votesSome have speculated that Marx’s diagnosis of capitalism is mostly accurate, and realistically assesses the legitimate downside of capitalism, but that his solution is utopian, impossibly idealistic, and completely unworkable as he envisioned it. What is Creator’s assessment of this outlook on Marx and his contribution to society?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society357 views0 answers0 votesOne of the biggest worries with laissez-faire capitalism is the almost inevitable development of monopolies. What is Creator’s perspective on this hazard of capitalism?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society396 views0 answers0 votesA student speculates that there are in fact two kinds of capitalism in conflict with each other: Entrepreneurial Capitalism versus Monopoly Capitalism. Society itself values entrepreneurial capitalism because it champions competition and encourages innovation. Society, on the other hand, suffers under monopolies as they tend to be anti-competitive and highly prone to engage in anti-competitive practices. Prices tend to go up, quality tends to go down, and workers are exploited as there is no competition for their labor. What is Creator’s perspective on these two proposed categories of capitalism?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society399 views0 answers0 votesThe tendency for wealth and the ownership of resources to concentrate in fewer and fewer hands under laissez-faire capitalism presents perhaps the same concern that communism does—slavery of the worker and lower classes of society by a tiny elite class of individuals. Instead of the government, the company is the fully controlling entity. The excesses of company housing and the infamous company store are legion, and one of the realities that contributed to the popularity of Marxism. What is Creator’s perspective on the dangers of concentrated wealth?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society385 views0 answers0 votesSome have asserted that a fascist government, is one that has been co-opted by corporate elites, such that whole governments become de facto extensions of corporate empires, and serve the interest of the corporations over those of the people. Many fear that this is the precise fate that awaits the United States (and perhaps the world). What is Creator’s perspective on this?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society372 views0 answers0 votesSince extreme concentration of wealth and political power seems to be a common theme with the rise of monopolies and corporate fascism, as well as socialism and communism as extreme responses that only seem to end up with precisely the same reality of the few exercising control of the many, what is Creator’s advice on the best way to cope and maybe regulate this propensity? Understanding that healing and mass enlightenment are the ultimate answers, what would Creator suggest as a more interim divinely aligned strategy?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society363 views0 answers0 votesA company, by definition, has a number of contributors, and while arguably the creator and innovator of a company deserves the lion’s share of the rewards, a question some have pondered is whether there should be some kind of limit or sunset on how long this should be allowed to go on? So long as descendants of the founders can manage the corporate empire, the empire could exist indefinitely, along with the stark and extreme apportionment of the profits to the owners and owners’ descendants. What is Creator’s perspective on this observation?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society367 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the true solutions to creating future collective prosperity, rather than anything involving direct societal planning, organization, and especially coercion of desired behaviors?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society402 views0 answers0 votesThe Magna Carta is now over 800 years old. It arose as a negotiated deal between the King of England and barons he was in conflict with. The barons were interested only in their own rights, not the rights of common people. Nevertheless, the foundational principle that “No one is above the law, even the king” was established. From this simple beginning, English common law arose that is foundational to the rule of law, and not rule by decree. What is the divine perspective on this event, was it divinely inspired, and why is it an outcome of violent conflict, rather than simple insight and reflection?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions278 views0 answers0 votesFollowing the Magna Carta, the king countered against the loss of power to the barons by removing the ability to trespass against the peasantry or the common person. This seeming act of tit-for-tat retribution essentially ended the slavery of the peasant and the practice of serfdom in England. It appears this was an unintended consequence of an impasse and conflict between two orbits of political power—the monarch and the aristocracy. To what extent did divine intervention make this dramatic turn of events for the common person possible?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions267 views0 answers0 votesSince the pivotal events of the Magna Carta and the resulting protection of the peasantry, the concept of “natural law” arose. The whole notion of “natural law” and “inalienable rights” recognizes a sovereign, and in fact DIVINE status of the individual person. At this time in the middle ages, the law was little more than custom, and mostly unwritten. In most locales, only the Catholic clergy was literate and educated. As a result, judges taking up positions after the Magna Carta were mostly RELIGIOUS MEN. How much was the concept of “inalienable rights” becoming the foundation of our modern legal system in Western-style democracies circumstantial, and how much was the result of divine intervention in response to human prayer?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions328 views0 answers0 votesAssuming the divine realm was significantly behind the advent and spread of our modern legal system, how was it that the interlopers failed to notice this development, and stop it before it got significant momentum? And if they didn’t fail to notice, was their curiosity around seeing what would happen, a result of some healing they received as a result of human prayer and entreaty?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions312 views0 answers0 votesHow much responsibility did this reconfiguration of the English legal system enable the birth and widespread economic and global success of the British Empire that followed on its heels?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions294 views0 answers0 votesWith the creation of a truly global empire, the option to exile lawbreakers, rather than pay for their upkeep in prison, or take the objectionable step to execute them for non-capital crimes, became a viable alternative. The country of Australia started as a penal colony. What is the divine perspective of exile as an alternative to imprisonment and capital punishment?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions277 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola