DWQA Questions › Tag: human responsibility
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Patton frequently claimed that he “hated war.” But almost nobody believed him. Such a statement seemed to violate almost everything anyone ever witnessed about his leadership. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
58 views0 answers0 votes
Both Patton and General Douglas MacArthur were considered Prima Donnas. Google defines prima donna as, “A very temperamental person with an inflated view of their own talent or importance.” Or, “Anyone who acted as if they were a world-famous talent.” But the irony is they were, indeed, “world-famous talents.” They were two of the most effective and successful combat leaders the world has EVER known. Yet many observers considered them “arrogant pretenders” nevertheless, and despised them for being so. Is this an example of “faking it ’til you make it,” and how much of this behavior was engaged in fully for “effect” but did not, in fact, reflect the men privately? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
55 views0 answers0 votes
General MacArthur used to frequently, and many would say recklessly, expose himself to danger in areas with known snipers. In one incident he actually stared out of a window at a sniper training his rifle at him from another building across the street. He then “casually” turned and walked away from the window a split second before a bullet came through the window aimed at him. When asked later about the behavior, he claimed he liked to “test his timing.” This behavior drove his subordinates “nuts.” Yet MacArthur survived the entirety of the war in his early sixties and without so much as a scratch. Patton behaved similarly and also survived the war, only to have his neck broken in the slightest of fender benders. What is Creator’s perspective on this behavior?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
81 views0 answers0 votes
A lot of terrible and deeply evil figures in history were also prima donnas. So it’s completely understandable that such figures are deeply distrusted. Where does one parse out the positive example versus the arrogant threat? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
62 views0 answers0 votes
What is Creator’s perspective on “combat stress reaction” or “battle fatigue?” So much of GetWisdom has been dedicated to healing historic trauma the deep subconscious reacts to, as this is understood to be the primary culprit behind MOST of our negative karmic issues and even the rise of evil itself in the galaxy. Yet trauma doesn’t have to be deep and can be right in your face, such as experienced by the soldiers Patton slapped (assuming their distress was quite real, and they were not faking it). Fleeing combat by any means certainly aligns with the karmic and divine imperative to protect oneself, but at the cost of abandoning their duty and comrades, not to mention setting an abysmal example of how to comport oneself in the face of danger. What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
60 views0 answers0 votes
The word “coward” has come to acquire a deeply negative connotation, so much so that it has fallen out of popular use almost entirely, and anyone attempting to use it faces significant backlash, both privately and especially publicly. And the word “brave” is being liberally used to praise victims and laud behavior that seems to lack any evidence, much less significant evidence, of the recipient actually having stood strong against a dilemma. Today there are certainly people who would call Patton a bully and the battle fatigue suffering soldiers he slapped brave, for merely being on the receiving end of his “despicable tirade.” What is Creator’s perspective on the abandonment of the word “coward” and the accompanying neutering of the word “brave,” a word that used to be reserved ONLY to describe one who displayed SIGNIFICANT evidence of having “stood strong?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
Patton’s slapping incidents became publicly known when journalist Drew Pearson broke the story on his national radio show. Wikipedia reports: “Pearson’s version not only conflated details of both slapping incidents but falsely reported that the private in question was visibly “out of his head,” telling Patton to “duck down or the shells would hit him,” and that in response, “Patton struck the soldier, knocking him down.” Pearson punctuated his broadcast by twice stating that Patton would never again be used in combat, despite the fact that Pearson had no factual basis for this prediction.” The Allied Command, and especially General Eisenhower, deemed Patton critical to the war effort, and this publicity complicated things enormously. That the media tends to conflate things is taken for granted these days. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
Just as things are today, the public was deeply divided over the slapping incidents. So much so, it was said it was the “slap heard round the world.” Half the population defended Patton and the other half demanded his firing. This shows the divide between the application of discipline versus the application of compassion. It is widely assumed that the two are diametric opposites but is that truly the case? What did those soldiers need most—a slap or a hug? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
Trauma is highly problematic, whether deeply buried or in your face. How can Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support heal historic trauma, and also help the recipient to “stand strong” when that approach to a dilemma is the most advised and perhaps wisest course of action?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
62 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, can you please give an update on the Gold Reset? Is it still going ahead as planned on the 21st August, 2024?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “‘Peter Pan Syndrome’ labels adults who seem unwilling or unable to take on adult responsibilities. It is characterized by avoidance of responsibility, difficulty in committing to relationships, careers, or life decisions, and prioritizing “freedom.” To what extent is this caused by childhood failures or distress making adulthood seem daunting, and to what extent is this mind control manipulation by subconscious programming from cellphones, WiFi, gaming, etc?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
110 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will karmic healing by the LHP alone be enough to heal those affected by ‘Peter Pan Syndrome?’ Will taking on responsibilities gradually, talking therapies, and encouragement be an effective treatment?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
71 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Should parents set boundaries on expected behaviors and obligations and enforce with consequences when addressing ‘Peter Pan Syndrome?'” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Would humanity have had a monetary system if the interlopers had not invaded our world? Otherwise, how would we have traded with each other and built commerce (if even necessary), considering how tedious bartering is?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
91 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “As we have all different karma and physiology, would it be advisable to have one of GetWisdom’s channelers to find out the best combination to take of the supplements suggested in a previous webinar?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…45678…84Next »
Ask Question