DWQA Questions › Tag: human potentialFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “Was the time sequence in this current universe the following: Anunnaki created, Angelics created simultaneously to assist them from higher realms, corruption of Angelics, followed by their corruption of the Anunnaki and eventually all other physical beings?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers200 views0 answers0 votesA viewer continues: “Following by corruption by Angelics, some of the other physical beings became powerful enough to challenge the Anunnaki, with wars between many of them, followed by a shaky alliance between the most powerful because of fear of destruction of each other. These include the Arcturians (with their AI alien Greys), and Reptilians. Is this where we stand today?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers199 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Being that the Reptilians are shape-shifters by design, have they modified their physical characteristics via the morphogenetic field to portray their current physical attributes in contrast to what they may have been like when first introduced into the physical realm before they became corrupted?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers193 views0 answers0 votesA viewer continues: “Were Reptilians always Reptilians in their appearance or is it a result of their self-image due to corruption?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers221 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “In one of our chat groups, this question was asked: ‘What about asking for shielding from the ETs for those involved in the Disclosure Movement to help protect them from nefarious influences?’ Is that feasible?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers196 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “The universe is 13.8 billion years old. We’ve been told the Anunnaki ‘civilization’ is nearly five billion years old. That doesn’t mean they were the first civilization in the galaxy, nor does it even imply that the Anunnaki species is only that old. They might be older than that, but maybe no more sophisticated than hunter-gatherer tribal groups. Is that a ‘civilization?’ I don’t know, can Creator elaborate on that?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers208 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “We learned about events in the early Milky Way Galaxy because I asked this question, ‘When was the war in heaven?’ And Creator said that was five billion years ago. So the founding of the Anunnaki civilization and the rebellion of the angelics led by Lucifer roughly coincided. Is civilization a result of the fall? Did the fallen angelics manipulate the relatively peaceful and primitive Anunnaki to seek power, and is that the seeking of power what fuels the creation of civilizations?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers208 views0 answers0 votesThe viewer asks: “Creator also said that prior to the Fall, other angels could pray for the healing of their fellow angels and that would be effective. But with the advent of the Fall, the angels were causing harm in the physical realm (something that had apparently not happened prior) and other angels could no longer heal that harm with their prayer. Instead, the healing for the harm caused in the physical plane, now had to come from the physical plane. So apparently, six billion years ago, this wasn’t a problem. But became a problem five billion years ago. So, I also know that Creator hinted, or even suggested, that one reason there is such confidence that we are close to solving the problem of evil, is because the Milky Way Galaxy Free Will Experiment worked up until the Luciferian-led rebellion of the fallen angelics, only five billion years ago, that caused the Free Will Experiment to take a bad turn. So the angels were there from the beginning, from the big bang itself, but the fallen angels have been around for only five billion years.” Is this analysis correct? What can you tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers211 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes, “I thought you would find this writing interesting by Tom Montalk: ‘Interesting thing to ponder: what’s stronger, military might or divine power? The obvious answer is divine power. But then you look at history: 1) 10-20 million Christians killed by the Soviets; 2) 1000s of Christians killed by ISIS in the Middle East this past decade alone; 3) 100s of thousands of Christian children during the Crusades headed to Jerusalem only to be killed or sold into slavery on their way; 4) Always that good Christian family in the news who lost everything in a storm or earthquake or flood. You would think, based on this, that God clearly favors communists and Muslims and natural disasters. Besides, why should divinity favor Christians? What about all the other religions? But millions of communists, Muslims, and Jews have died as well over the centuries. Is there any class of people that’s consistently protected by the divine against military might? You could go back to the Old Testament and the Israelites and what was done for them, which if true, brings up the question of why back then and not since? Yet there’s no doubt that tyrannies and armies have risen and fallen and, in the end, spirituality and religion has endured. So spirit has the last laugh, but was it a Pyrrhic victory considering the millions lost? Or do we place too much value on life and comfort, and death, torture, and slavery isn’t that big of a deal in the eyes of eternity? There are also countless anecdotes of individuals and small groups of people being saved by supernatural intervention. Mysterious strangers helping them only to disappear without a trace, or voices telling them where to seek shelter, or the very laws of physics being bent to keep them from dying. And we have key people being guided by supernatural influences to exert their position/authority to help many other people. So certain individuals matter at certain times enough to get major intervention. But what’s missing is collective, massive, open divine intervention against military physical force, especially in the last 1000 years, let alone modern times. That hasn’t happened to my knowledge, unless it’s been covered up. And because of that, the USSR could kill up to 20 million Christians because it had the military might to do so, and because, for whatever reason, divine power doesn’t prevent collective events.'” His first question is: “Is divinity unable to [prevent collective events]? Then it’s not omnipotent.” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Creator288 views0 answers0 votesThe author says this about the divine choosing to not intervene on behalf of groups: “Then it condoned genocide in the 20th century and favored the Nazis and Communists over Christians and Jews. If it’s willing to sacrifice them, what does that say about our safety during the coming times?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Creator294 views0 answers0 votesThe author further asks about divine intervention on behalf of groups: “Did it do that once upon a time, like with the Israelites? If so, why not now? And does that have anything to do with the supposed quarantine that went into effect 3k years ago preventing aliens from openly interfering with human development? Or were the Israelites being protected by aliens? Or is the history of the Israelites fabricated?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Creator273 views0 answers0 votesThe author continues: “If it [divine power] doesn’t prevent genocide, what is the reason? Karma of the victims? If so, does that mean mass murderers are guiltless because they are just fulfilling the karmic “wishes” of the victims and thus doing them a spiritual service?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Creator232 views0 answers0 votesThe author continues: “Or is the temporary victory of military might, and the thousands or millions that suffer as a result, merely a product of the rules of the game here, a necessary side effect of free will being an integral part of this whole experience?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Creator210 views0 answers0 votesThe author continues: “Would too much intervention destroy free will and also ruin the fiction by which souls here find full immersion in their catalytic experiences? Does that serve as an exploit in the game, by which dark forces can play the rules so well that they end up checkmating divinity and get to enact decades of enslavement, torture, oppression?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Creator206 views0 answers0 votesThe author continues: “If so, then it’s absolutely true that “God helps those who help themselves” and “You have to meet God halfway,” generally speaking, as the miracles come via grace and are therefore not reliable, like clockwork, as history has shown.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Creator231 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola