DWQA Questions › Tag: human ignorance
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Dr. Schwartz and colleagues conducted a number of experiments with high profile mediums in the late nineties that resulted in both a book, The Afterlife Experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death, and an HBO special entitled “Life Afterlife.” The experiments were conducted in such a way, that no truly objective mind could dismiss the findings as essentially proving beyond a reasonable doubt, that these mediums were legitimately able to see, hear and communicate readily with the dead. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
The HBO special “Life Afterlife” was another story, however. Dr. Schwartz wrote: “HBO had made a beautiful, inspiring show. But the science was sandwiched in the middle and lost nearly all its impact. We had expected that the show would leave the audience feeling ‘Science can be brought to bear on these issues,’ and ‘Wow, those mediums were tested by science and actually were found to be doing what they claimed.’ Instead, the show was good entertainment but little more. We had thought HBO really cared about the science, but discovered what the producers most wanted was to see how many people were crying when the lights went up. After all, HBO didn’t really care about making a scientific statement.” In fact, HBO had given almost as much air time to skeptics, as they did Dr. Schwartz’s experiments. The producers apparently believed they were being “professional and fair” giving equal time to skeptics and therefore creating a “balanced” presentation. But in this case, it seems a “balanced” presentation is simply sinister. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
239 views0 answers0 votes
During the experiments, at one point Dr. Schwartz’s own mother was trying to come through and was overpowering the other dead people who were scheduled to make an appearance. This seemed to convey how little actual “control” the medium had over the channels of communication. It seemed the dead were more successful at establishing and controlling the boundaries of communication than the medium himself. Is this one of the reasons why divine partnership is so critical when one works with non-local consciousness?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
233 views0 answers0 votes
Also, during the experiments, there were a few occasions where one medium or another simply could not communicate with the dead people associated with a particular sitter. They simply got “nothing” the way most people would. Yet, a different medium would have no trouble with that sitter at all. It was summed up as the particular medium simply “wasn’t right” for that particular sitter. Yet that medium would have profound success with other sitters. Can Creator explain why this “all or nothing” anomaly occurred?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
225 views0 answers0 votes
One thing notably absent from the experiments was the entire notion of reincarnation. Nor was there any distinction made, or awareness of different states or conditions the dead might be communicating from. We know that one of three who die end up in limbo. Yet all the dead communicating appeared to be doing so from the same “place.” What was the reality of the dead in that set of experiments? Were all in the light? If so, were rescues performed for some prior to the experiments, and if so, by whom? Did the experiment itself act as a kind of “rescue entreaty” that enabled the divine to step in and “set the table” ahead of time? Or, indeed, were some in the light and some in limbo, even though there was no indication of such status during the experiments? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
234 views0 answers0 votes
The question of corruption is a compelling one. The mediumship on display and being tested in the experiments was “garden variety” in the sense it was focused on family and personal relationship issues more than anything, and therefore presumably of little interest to the interlopers. However, if the experiment had attempted to explore more expansive issues, such as GetWisdom explores, would extraterrestrial psychics have “jumped in” and taken over the channel much like Dr. Schwartz’s own mother did?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
237 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Schwartz wrote about what he called “skeptomania” and “voodoo skepticism.” He wrote, “It’s one thing to be skeptical – open to alternative hypotheses. It’s another to be devoutly skeptical – always ‘knowing’ that cheating, lying, fraud, and deception are the explanations for any not-yet-explainable phenomena.” Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help reduce the ranks of the “devoutly skeptical?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
212 views0 answers0 votes
You told us that Trump was the President favored by the Extraterrestrial Alliance, as they wanted someone who is “tough” for what is being planned. So, when the Democrats won the 2020 election, I had a feeling the interlopers would do their best to make us regret it. Have they been behind the many false starts, missteps, and far left agenda that Biden has followed, rather than being the centrist he promised to be?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
384 views0 answers0 votes
The Democrats maintain that the 2020 Presidential Race was won fairly, but what about the influence of the Big Tech companies, as when Twitter banned President Trump from communicating with the public directly? It was since reported that Google blocked Trump fundraising by anyone using Gmail, and that three major phone carriers, T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon all blocked the Trump Campaign ability to send text messages. Did that happen, and if so, was it orchestrated by a hidden force, or were these all independent political acts?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
270 views0 answers0 votes
In a previous channeling on Lucifer, Creator said the following: “So this well known risk of power, that ‘Absolute power corrupts absolutely,’ has applied once again in the story of Lucifer. This need not be so, but if not guarded against is a trap for the unwary.” You explained the major risk of great power as being too great a reward for the ego, causing one to become too self-serving. What then is needed to prevent that?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
376 views0 answers0 votes
For the benefit of our better understanding, and with all due respect to you as the being with absolute power in the universe, how does Creator avoid corruption, if absolute power corrupts absolutely?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
455 views0 answers0 votes
In a previous channeling on Lucifer, Creator said, “In the particular universe you find yourselves at the moment, things were more successful than the prior iteration.” Can Creator elaborate on that statement? The current universe is estimated to be about 14.5 billion years old. Where on that timeline did the so-called “War in Heaven” start to become a serious problem? Was there karmic baggage from previous universes that played a role to trigger and help to fuel the current dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
458 views0 answers0 votes
We know from Creator, that Karl earned greater access to the divine while in this physical incarnation, on account of his service and success in his previous life as Allan Kardec. Can we safely assume that Lucifer attained his role in a similar fashion, as stated previously by Creator, that “Lucifer was an archangel of the highest order and was entrusted with dominion over the angelics within the Milky Way Galaxy as a whole?” Can Creator share with us more of Lucifer’s “resume” that earned him the trust to have “dominion over the angelics?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
397 views0 answers0 votes
Another question arises from this statement by Creator: “So this well-known risk of power, that ‘Absolute power corrupts absolutely,’ has applied once again in the story of Lucifer. This need not be so, but if not guarded against is a trap for the unwary.” This seems to be a bit of a paradoxical conundrum. On the one hand, Creator is saying “if not guarded against” followed by “trap for the unwary.” The word “unwary” implies ignorance, a critical lack of experience with negative consequences, and failure to take precautions. Is this essentially what happened to Lucifer? Was he a victim of his own prior successes—too much success, and not enough failure to truly instill in him the wisdom and forbearance needed to avoid catastrophe?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
317 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator further comment on the hazards of too much success, too quickly? Is the only true cure for a critical lack of experience, more experience? Humans, in particular, have a tendency to reward the successful with even more responsibility and access and control of resources. There is also the time-worn caveat of people rising to the level of their incompetence. The ultra-successful have the added danger of getting there faster and, as a result, not just reaching the level of their incompetence, but over-shooting it by a wide margin—finding themselves in a situation where they are not only incompetent but grossly so. Is this also a fair characterization of what happened to Lucifer?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
308 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…2324252627…42Next »
Ask Question