DWQA Questions › Tag: human culture
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
He asks: “Is YESHUA somehow associated with the being known as Enki?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
162 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Analytical psychotherapist Carl Jung believed in inherited unconscious knowledge and experiences across generations, expressed through universal symbols and archetypes such as gods like Mars (god of war), Venus (goddess of love), Prometheus (rebelliousness) and so on. Earlier civilizations such as the Roman Empire took the existence of such gods literally and assumed they were responsible for day-to-day events. How should we now understand this idea? Are gods in fact dynamic psychic energies that have an existence that can be personified and communicated with, to better understand, for example, diseases and illness? In what ways is this a useable idea in modern times?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
135 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I would like to know if you could ask Source Creator if an autopsy affects in any way one reaching the light, as one was done on my mother against my will after she passed, a fact which is very upsetting for me?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
206 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “The Ganges is considered by Hindus and even some skeptics to be a sacred river. To Hindus the Ganges is seen as a pure and purifying body of water that is incredibly important. To scientists and outsiders the Ganges appears to be a horrifying example of modern pollution and political corruption where humans are failing to cooperate with a common goal. Is the Ganges River receiving divine protection thanks to a mass prayer request from billions of inhabitants of that region? Are the people that regard the Ganges as sacred providing the intention necessary to allow the divine realm to transform and transmute this potentially harmful and polluted water into something safe?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
190 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “How can humanity know and understand, and especially how can parents teach their children, what a war is, without them having to experience a war; what hunger is, without them having to experience hunger; what Dictatorship is, without them having to suffer under a Dictatorship, and so on? Surely there has to be a better way to truly learn and understand about evil and suffering than experiencing all these horrors individually over and over again, generation after generation?” What is Creator perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
240 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Can Creator confirm and briefly explain the existence of Places of Power as discovered by Ljubisa Stoyanovic and the elements of Light, Peace, and The Creator’s Presence along with Luminous Bodies gathered there?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
194 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Does visiting these places hold benefit for the spiritual seeker of enlightenment and can it increase the belief quotient of LHP practitioners?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
170 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Does praying or initiating the LHP at these locations alone or in groups of practitioners magnify the results and efficacy?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
176 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Can the current location of these places in the area of the USA be made aware to us?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
201 views0 answers0 votes
Wikipedia defines the Dunning-Kruger effect as follows: “The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a certain type of a task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge.” This effect seems common, and when encountered, almost completely resistant to challenge or debate. What is Creator’s perspective on the Dunning-Kruger effect? How much can be attributed to subconscious programming, and how much to the simple immaturity of the incarnated human?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
183 views0 answers0 votes
A person with Dunning-Kruger might say something like, “… of course, I don’t know. I don’t NEED to know. I have COMMON SENSE.” And then expects their opinion to carry equal (or even greater) weight in a given debate. Can Creator share just how a person comes to think this way?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
187 views0 answers0 votes
Another behavior related to Dunning-Kruger would be a tendency to appeal to some kind of superior credential, even and especially if it is completely unrelated to the given debate at hand. Such a credential would be physical age: “Well young man, I am twenty years your senior, I think I know a thing or two.” Or, “You’re talking to a decorated veteran, show some respect!” Or, “I’ve lived a good life, had a lucrative career, raised three upstanding children, and am a grandparent to boot! I think my opinion should matter!” This tendency to take shelter in some kind of superior, if wholly unrelated and even irrelevant credential, is widespread and sometimes very problematic. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
Creator described the ego in a previous GetWisdom LIVE program as follows: “The ego is a limited vessel, a limited capability that puts the self, first. As such, it is kind of like having a suit of armor that is self-protective. It might be awkward to wear, inconvenient, even drag you down from the sheer weight and inconvenience of suiting up before you make an excursion where you are at risk, but a potential lifesaver if you are attacked and would otherwise be vulnerable and perish. The suit of armor gives you a fighting chance at least. The ego, in the same way, is more like a weapon in being quite focused on your supremacy. In a sense, it is your last refuge to maintain an advantage and hold your ground to stand up to those who would bully you or intimidate, and provide a wherewithal to weather the storm.” The Dunning-Kruger effect appears to be the ego fulfilling this very function in a crude, imprecise, but very forceful and compelling manner. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
181 views0 answers0 votes
Creator has previously discussed five principal selves that make up the human being—the deep subconscious, subconscious, cellular consciousness, primary or conscious self, and the higher self. What about the ego? Can it be, should it be, characterized as a “sixth self?” And if not, why not?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
210 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that some skills, muscle memory, and other proclivities we call natural talent, can be recorded in the akashic records, and re-introduced into the cellular consciousness of a new body in a new incarnation. This is how natural talent can be carried over from lifetime to lifetime. What about the ego? Is it also recorded in the akashic records and re-introduced in some fashion to a new incarnation? Is it, like karma and physical talent, left behind when one becomes a light being but re acquired upon a new incarnation (so the incarnating soul can essentially pick up where they left off)? Is the ego truly left behind when the departing consciousness enters the light and is it one of the big reasons there is more wisdom and clarity as light beings? Or is the ego of a particular lifetime utterly lost upon transition, and new incarnations start off with an essentially blank ego?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
180 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…9Next »