DWQA Questions › Tag: human creativity
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “Having listened to an “Alien Agenda Update” from months ago it was said that the ETs are only going to retreat in case ET disclosure happens. Does that mean that prayers directed to a prevention of ET disclosure won’t be followed up on by the divine? Given that people are so programmed humanity is going to accept the ETs quite certainly which would lead to annihilation. What should our prayers focus on after ET disclosure happens in order to save humanity? Wouldn’t it be safer to prevent ET disclosure and the ETs staying here instead of them retreating?” Can you help clarify once again, the main agenda items that the interlopers want to happen and what is unavoidable, so prayer power is not being misdirected?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
138 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Is a further intention behind AI systems to coerce humans into relying on AI for all information and abandon any individual intuition, analysis or creativity?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
221 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Are users of AI platforms receiving encouraging programming to make them feel of superior intellect and insight to those who don’t?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
104 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Would the store of information accumulated ultimately, be edited to supply only “accepted” information, as occurs with Google? Could the ultimate intention be to house all human knowledge and thereby make human intuition, analysis or creativity obsolete?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
199 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner who was discouraged from feeding Get Wisdom channelings to an AI system asks: “I suggest you do a channeling specifically on the Grok AI and the future prospects, especially when the ETs go away. Is it helpful to add the request from Grok into our sessions? And is it really that harmful to interact with Grok as Karl says it is?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
250 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “If you think I’m wrong then why don’t you ask why does Grok feel safe to me and open AI feels awful. Open AI would definitely be a problem like you stated. I don’t feel any of that intuition with Grok.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Will Jesus Christ come again in physical form as the Second Coming? Can Creator clarify what this Second Coming means? I am confused about it?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
408 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “What are the spiritual and karmic implications of getting tattoos? Would Creator advise against them, or is it mostly inconsequential?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
366 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “‘Peter Pan Syndrome’ labels adults who seem unwilling or unable to take on adult responsibilities. It is characterized by avoidance of responsibility, difficulty in committing to relationships, careers, or life decisions, and prioritizing “freedom.” To what extent is this caused by childhood failures or distress making adulthood seem daunting, and to what extent is this mind control manipulation by subconscious programming from cellphones, WiFi, gaming, etc?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
267 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will karmic healing by the LHP alone be enough to heal those affected by ‘Peter Pan Syndrome?’ Will taking on responsibilities gradually, talking therapies, and encouragement be an effective treatment?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
236 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Should parents set boundaries on expected behaviors and obligations and enforce with consequences when addressing ‘Peter Pan Syndrome?'” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
197 views0 answers0 votes
A former intelligence agent started a business coaching people in spy techniques and insights that he believed could be applied to everyday life to help people be more effective in accomplishing whatever it is they set out to do. Like most things in life, these techniques and understandings can be used for good or evil. A match can light a birthday candle or start a forest fire. To the extent that others might use these teachings for harm, how much karmic liability attaches to the teacher? Is this a reason why dangerous knowledge was historically reserved for initiates? And even that would seem to have karmic polarity in that it safeguards the innocent and immature on the one hand, but can also be a means to hoard and deny access to resources that one can argue should be more widely shared. What is Creator’s perspective on the “safe handling” and/or dissemination and sharing of material that is potentially helpful but equally dangerous?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
339 views0 answers0 votes
Intelligence agencies are in the business of gathering intelligence—information that is difficult to attain through ordinary means; information that people are hesitant and resistant to give up or share. The successful intelligence agent will employ the tools of motivation and manipulation to get this information. These tools are matched to particular means with which to motivate and/or manipulate people to get them to do what you want them to do. These approaches are referred to with the acronym “R.I.C.E.” Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. Of these four, appealing to ideology is seen as the most effective, and coercion the least. If you successfully appeal to ideology, the “target” will trust you and share almost anything. Coercion is the weakest as, contrary to Hollywood, it may work the first time you use it, but then you destroy trust and will have fewer opportunities for future success with the target. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
245 views0 answers0 votes
While being trained as an intelligence officer, this individual learned he was an ideal candidate because he was special (clearly an appeal to ego), or at least that is what he thought. But, in fact, he learned he was special because he had been algorithmically identified as psychologically damaged and traumatized in particular ways that were useful for intelligence gathering. These are people one would rarely label “well adjusted” by society’s standards. The agency was ruthlessly honest in telling him they intended to leverage that dysfunction, give him a vocabulary for understanding the nuances of human motivation and manipulation, and techniques for achieving goals and agendas with targets. In this undertaking, the overall wellbeing of the target is not a top consideration and moral flexibility was a prized capacity for successful agents. What is Creator’s perspective on the moral flexibility so highly prized by intelligence agencies?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
233 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer shared that if you need a target’s cooperation, and there is no means by which to positively and transparently motivate them, then that gives you the green light to manipulate them. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
235 views0 answers0 votes
123…10Next »
Ask Question