DWQA Questions › Tag: human complacency
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Is another reason there are so few, because of the divine injunction against forcing non believers to change their belief by providing overwhelming evidence, as opposed to a free will exploring of ideas, rather than imposition of belief? One of the reasons skeptics seem to have an easy time dismissing such extraordinary abilities is their incredible rarity in the population. What can Creator share with us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
212 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona has spent much of his career exploring paranormal phenomena shunned by the vast majority of his colleagues. He is the author of numerous books on paranormal topics and has conducted a number of high-profile experiments with astonishing results. It’s almost a miracle in its own right that he has avoided scandal and has managed to retain his employment as a tenured faculty member. Were his career and the careers of his close compatriots protected and facilitated by the divine realm? Why are there so few like Gary Schwartz as such open-minded academic scholars appear to be even rarer than the mediums he’s studied? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
211 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Schwartz and colleagues conducted a number of experiments with high profile mediums in the late nineties that resulted in both a book, The Afterlife Experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death, and an HBO special entitled “Life Afterlife.” The experiments were conducted in such a way, that no truly objective mind could dismiss the findings as essentially proving beyond a reasonable doubt, that these mediums were legitimately able to see, hear and communicate readily with the dead. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
208 views0 answers0 votes
The HBO special “Life Afterlife” was another story, however. Dr. Schwartz wrote: “HBO had made a beautiful, inspiring show. But the science was sandwiched in the middle and lost nearly all its impact. We had expected that the show would leave the audience feeling ‘Science can be brought to bear on these issues,’ and ‘Wow, those mediums were tested by science and actually were found to be doing what they claimed.’ Instead, the show was good entertainment but little more. We had thought HBO really cared about the science, but discovered what the producers most wanted was to see how many people were crying when the lights went up. After all, HBO didn’t really care about making a scientific statement.” In fact, HBO had given almost as much air time to skeptics, as they did Dr. Schwartz’s experiments. The producers apparently believed they were being “professional and fair” giving equal time to skeptics and therefore creating a “balanced” presentation. But in this case, it seems a “balanced” presentation is simply sinister. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
222 views0 answers0 votes
During the experiments, at one point Dr. Schwartz’s own mother was trying to come through and was overpowering the other dead people who were scheduled to make an appearance. This seemed to convey how little actual “control” the medium had over the channels of communication. It seemed the dead were more successful at establishing and controlling the boundaries of communication than the medium himself. Is this one of the reasons why divine partnership is so critical when one works with non-local consciousness?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
227 views0 answers0 votes
Also, during the experiments, there were a few occasions where one medium or another simply could not communicate with the dead people associated with a particular sitter. They simply got “nothing” the way most people would. Yet, a different medium would have no trouble with that sitter at all. It was summed up as the particular medium simply “wasn’t right” for that particular sitter. Yet that medium would have profound success with other sitters. Can Creator explain why this “all or nothing” anomaly occurred?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
One thing notably absent from the experiments was the entire notion of reincarnation. Nor was there any distinction made, or awareness of different states or conditions the dead might be communicating from. We know that one of three who die end up in limbo. Yet all the dead communicating appeared to be doing so from the same “place.” What was the reality of the dead in that set of experiments? Were all in the light? If so, were rescues performed for some prior to the experiments, and if so, by whom? Did the experiment itself act as a kind of “rescue entreaty” that enabled the divine to step in and “set the table” ahead of time? Or, indeed, were some in the light and some in limbo, even though there was no indication of such status during the experiments? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
226 views0 answers0 votes
The question of corruption is a compelling one. The mediumship on display and being tested in the experiments was “garden variety” in the sense it was focused on family and personal relationship issues more than anything, and therefore presumably of little interest to the interlopers. However, if the experiment had attempted to explore more expansive issues, such as GetWisdom explores, would extraterrestrial psychics have “jumped in” and taken over the channel much like Dr. Schwartz’s own mother did?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
227 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Schwartz wrote about what he called “skeptomania” and “voodoo skepticism.” He wrote, “It’s one thing to be skeptical – open to alternative hypotheses. It’s another to be devoutly skeptical – always ‘knowing’ that cheating, lying, fraud, and deception are the explanations for any not-yet-explainable phenomena.” Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help reduce the ranks of the “devoutly skeptical?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
204 views0 answers0 votes
The viewer continues: “Was Sylvia Browne divinely inspired or deceived? To what extent were her teachings accurate?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
264 views0 answers0 votes
Is there a plan to accompany extraterrestrial Disclosure with a disappearance of royal families and billionaires, and the revelation by Arcturians coming forward with a deceptive offer of help, claiming credit and saying those fleeing were Reptilians preying on society but fearing the arrival of the benevolent ETs?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
506 views0 answers0 votes
Will the President of the U.S. and the President’s family suddenly disappear along with other key world leaders, and be described as fleeing Reptilians, as a way to greatly ramp up fear and dupe the public about need for help from the presumed benevolent Arcturian extraterrestrials?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
395 views0 answers0 votes
A television program featured a Florida woman describing an encounter with an alien being in her backyard 8 years ago. She saw an unusual shimmering in the air above the trees behind her house. Then, a large being stepped out beside the treeline and stared at her. She described it as being tall, with a “military-type” body. The most shocking thing was that it had a large head that was non-human she described as monstrous, with large unblinking eyes. She made a quite artistic sketch of it that fits that description quite closely. The being went behind the bushes and then stepped out again, took several steps towards her and stopped. Then went towards the shimmering spot and both disappeared. What actually happened and why? Was this intended as a friendly outreach? Was this a visitation to give her a warning because she’s in the Mercenary Army Program, as the extraterrestrials do to keep people in line between tours of duty? Or was this to help the Disclosure Movement, to support their coming story to beware the Reptilian presence on Earth?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
353 views0 answers0 votes
You told us that Trump was the President favored by the Extraterrestrial Alliance, as they wanted someone who is “tough” for what is being planned. So, when the Democrats won the 2020 election, I had a feeling the interlopers would do their best to make us regret it. Have they been behind the many false starts, missteps, and far left agenda that Biden has followed, rather than being the centrist he promised to be?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
375 views0 answers0 votes
The Democrats maintain that the 2020 Presidential Race was won fairly, but what about the influence of the Big Tech companies, as when Twitter banned President Trump from communicating with the public directly? It was since reported that Google blocked Trump fundraising by anyone using Gmail, and that three major phone carriers, T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon all blocked the Trump Campaign ability to send text messages. Did that happen, and if so, was it orchestrated by a hidden force, or were these all independent political acts?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
263 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…2425262728…50Next »