DWQA Questions › Tag: high-risk population
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Dr. Al Sears cited what he calls “a landmark study conducted by scientists at the Cleveland Clinic.” The researchers discovered that recipients of more than one dose of a Covid vaccine are more likely to contract the virus. According to the study, the more vaccine doses received, the greater the risk: 1.5 times higher for those with two doses; 1.95 times higher for those with three doses; and 2.5 times higher for those with more than three doses. Despite these findings, the CDC continues to recommend Covid vaccines for virtually everyone age 6 months and older. The Cleveland researchers concluded that while the vaccines offer some short-term protection, they also likely increase the risk of future infection. The problem appears to be that taking multiple vaccine doses leads to “antibody-dependent enhancement.” In other words, the immune system’s response becomes skewed towards older virus strains, making it less effective against newer strains. In past channelings, you have defended the Covid-19 vax as necessary to prevent deaths overall during the pandemic, despite the risk of side effects. How would you answer these new criticisms of those advising against further vaccination? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
89 views0 answers0 votes
Human papillomavirus vaccination has been linked to occurrence of an autoimmune brain disorder, anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis, and that form of encephalitis has been observed to occur shortly after Covid-19 vaccination as well. Are these outbreaks of unusual autoimmune symptoms actually being produced by a contaminating virus inserted into vaccines surreptitiously?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
108 views0 answers0 votes
A recent study released as a preprint by S. Zhang and W. El-Deiry showed that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein inhibits tumor suppressor gene p53. The media is promoting the speculation this may explain a rise in cancer starting a year after the beginning of the pandemic, when vaccines based on mRNA spike protein production in the body became available. Is this a significant downside of the vaccines?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines did not impact overall mortality, a reanalysis of clinical trial data found. The two vaccines, both based on messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, protected against deaths from COVID-19 but that effect was offset by vaccinated trial participants being more likely to die from cardiovascular problems, Christine Stabell Benn, a health professor at the University of Southern Denmark, and other researchers reported in April in the journal, Cell. On the other hand, vaccines that utilized adenoviruses, such as the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, had a favorable impact on both COVID-19 mortality and overall mortality, according to the reanalysis. The research analyzed data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reported by the companies that manufacture the vaccines. “In the RCTs with the longest possible blinded follow-up, mRNA vaccines had no effect on overall mortality despite protecting against some COVID-19 deaths. On the other hand, the adenovirus-vector vaccines were associated with lower overall mortality,” researchers said. Is this re-analysis accurate and trustworthy? What is the conclusion we should draw from this work?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
352 views0 answers0 votes
There is a headline on news stories saying: “The Omicron XBB.1.5 variant of COVID-19 is more likely to infect individuals who have been vaccinated, according to New York City health officials.” The NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene wrote on Twitter on Jan. 13: “Omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 now accounts for 73 percent of all sequenced COVID-19 cases in NYC. XBB.1.5 is the most transmissible form of COVID-19 that we know of to date and may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated or already had COVID-19.” Despite this, the department urged New Yorkers to get vaccinated and receive the updated COVID-19 booster shot, stating that doing so “is still the best way to protect yourself from hospitalization and death from COVID-19, including from these new variants.” It is written in a way that suggests there is increased susceptibility to infection caused by prior vaccination. Is that correct?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
210 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, is there any truth about a new variant of the Omicron virus, named XBB, claimed to be the most deadly virus so far in the 21st century?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
415 views0 answers0 votes
Yale epidemiology professor, Dr. Harvey Risch, recently cited the British Covid data showing that those getting a 3-shot vaxx sequence, when they eventually became infected anyway, had worse outcomes than an unvaxxed control group. That outcome was attributed to the downside of antibody-dependent enhancement. Are those data and interpretation correct?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
245 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 can cause a 10% incidence of cardiac problems, and things will worsen with each re-infection because of cumulative organ damage. Will the tissue injury be less during each bout of illness if people are vaccinated?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
211 views0 answers0 votes
The Covid-19 vaccines and boosters clearly do not prevent infection or transmission of the newer Omicron strains, B.4 and B.5. Now, with the possibility of vaccination causing more severe symptoms with the new strains, is it time to retire the vaccines?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
248 views0 answers0 votes
Ask Question